Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The open tension-free mesh-plug hernia technique, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique, and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic technique all are common surgical procedures for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair. However, the choice of the right surgical procedure still is controversial in China. This study aimed to compare open tension-free hernioplasty with two laparoscopic hernia repairs.

Methods

In this study, 164 male patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to undergo an open operation with mesh-plug and patch, TAPP, or TEP.

Results

Completion of the study required 3 years, from February 2006 to February 2009. Of the 164 patients, 62 underwent open repair, 50 had TAPP, and 52 had TEP. The patients then were followed up for 15.6 ± 8.5 months. The average operating time for the open repair group was significantly shorter than for the other two groups (p < 0.001). The cost for the open repair group also was significantly less than for the other two groups (p < 0.001). By contrast, the pain scores in the open mesh group were significantly higher than in the other two groups (p < 0.001). The hospital stay and the recovery time both were significantly longer in open repair group than in the other two groups (p < 0.001). No major complications or recurrence was found in any of the groups.

Conclusions

The findings show that open tension-free mesh-plug hernia repair, TAPP, and TEP are safe and effective for patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Both TAPP and TEP are superior to open repair in terms of less postoperative pain and faster recovery time. The authors therefore recommend laparoscopic repair techniques as the preferable choice of surgical procedure. However, they think open repair will remain a practical solution in China because of its lower cost, short learning period, and need for no special equipment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pavlids TE (2010) Current opinion on laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 24:974–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1993) “Tension- free” inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the “mesh plug” technique. Surgery 114:3–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1998) Classification system and groin hernia. Surg Clin North Am 78:1117–1127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vale L, Ludbrook A, Grant A (2003) Assessing the costs and consequences of laparoscopic vs open methods of groin hernia repair: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 17:844–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dulucq J-L, Wintringer P, Mahajna (2009) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3, 100 hernia repairs over 15 years. Surg Endosc 23:482–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, Sandbue RP, Bergkvist LÅ, Rudberg CR (2009) Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 249:33–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arregui ME, Young SB (2005) Groin hernia repair by laparoscopic techniques: current status and controversies. World J Surg 29:1052–1057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trail. Surg Endosc 19:188–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Dyer PJ (2004) Current status of the debate on laparoscopic hernia repair. Br Med Bull 70:105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pikoulis E, Daskalakis P, Psallidas N, Karavokyros I, Stathoulopolos A, Godevenos D, Leppaniemi A, Tsatsoulis P (2005) Marlex Mesh Prefix Plug hernioplasty: retrospective analysis of 865 operations. World J Surg 29:231–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Butler RE, Burke B, Schneider JJ, Brar H, Lucha PA Jr (2007) The economic impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: results of a double-blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc 21:387–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reuben B, Neumayer L (2006) Surgical management of inguinal hernia. Adv Surg 40:299–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johansson B, Hallerbäck B, Glise H, Anesten B, Smedberg S, Román J (1999) Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 230:225–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zieren J, Hoksch B, Wenger FA, Opitz I, Müller JM (2001) Inguinal hernia repair in new millennium: plug and patch repair with local anesthesia. World J Surg 25:138–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Pool AEM, Harlaar JJ, den Hoed PT, Weidema WF, van Veen RN (2010) Long-term follow-up evaluation of chronic pain after endoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of primary and recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. Published online 7 January

  17. Kocijan R, Sandberg S, Chan Y-W, Hollinsky C (2010) Anatomical changes after inguinal hernia treatment: a reason for chronic pain and recurrent hernia? Surg Endosc 24:395–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Veen RN, Wijsmuller AR, Vrijland WW, Hop WC, Lange JF, Jeekel J (2007) Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus nonmesh primary inguinal hernia repair: long-term chronic pain at 10 years. Surgery 142:695–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fei L, Filippone G, Trapani V, Cuttitta D, lannuzzi E, lannuzzi M, Galizia G, Moccia F, Signoriello G (2006) Feasibility of primary inguinal hernia repair with a new mesh. World J Surg 30:1055–1062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanders DL, Samarakoon DH, Ganshirt SW, Porter CS, Kingsnorth AN (2009) A two-centre blinded randomized control study comparing the Lichtenstein patch, Perfix plug and ProLoop plug in the repair of primary inguinal hernia. Hernia 13:499–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Ke Gong, Nengwei Zhang, Yiping LU, Bin Zhu, Zhanzhi Zhang, Dexiao Du, Xia Zhao, and Haijun Jiang have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, No.10, Tieyi Road, Yangfangdian, Haidian District, Beijing, China, 100038

    Ke Gong, Nengwei Zhang, Yiping Lu, Bin Zhu, Zhanzhi Zhang, Dexiao Du, Xia Zhao & Haijun Jiang

Authors
  1. Ke Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nengwei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yiping Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bin Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhanzhi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dexiao Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xia Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Haijun Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke Gong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gong, K., Zhang, N., Lu, Y. et al. Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25, 234–239 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1165-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1165-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation