Skip to main content
Log in

Ergonomic assessment of the static stress confronted by surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Only a few reports on static strain in the spine, neck, and head of the surgeon are available, describing it as “distinctly harmful.” The aim of this study was to objectively prove the static burden during laparoscopic operations. For this, new industrial software called PCMAN was used, capable of measuring and comparing the postures of the surgeon at different monitor placements.

Methods

Two simultaneous and synchronized video recordings of laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) were done using miniDV digital camcorders with the cameras standing at a 90° angle to each other. Twenty operations were performed using two different placements of the monitor. In 10 cases, the monitor was placed at the patient’s head in the center, and in 10 cases at the left side of the patient. Using the time codes of the recordings, different steps of the operation were identified, and the duration of these measured in seconds. Very characteristic, longer lasting postures were imported to and analyzed with the software. Results of the different setups were compared to each other, and to an “ideal” comfort posture.

Results

During the intermediate steps of the operations the rate of static phases is significantly higher. Measuring the typical postures of these phases the trunk and head are significantly more rotated and bent than in comfort positions. When the monitor was at the side of the patient facing the surgeon, results were closer to the comfort posture.

Conclusions

It was proven that surgeons are confronted by significant static burden during LC. The software used was able to evaluate objectively the static posture of the surgeon during series of LC. Results also confirmed that the position of monitors significantly influences the surgeon’s posture. Best setups for the whole team can be achieved by adjustable multiple monitor systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R Berguer GT Rab H Abu-Ghaida A Alarcon J Chung (1997) ArticleTitleA comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 2 139–142 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R Berguer DL Forkey WD Smith (1999) ArticleTitleErgonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 5 466–468

    Google Scholar 

  3. R Berguer WD Smith YH Chung (2001) ArticleTitlePerforming laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surg Endosc 10 1204–1207 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R Berquer WD Smith S Davis (2002) ArticleTitleAn ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 3 416–421 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-8190-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A Cuschieri (1995) ArticleTitleWhither minimal access surgery: tribulations and expectations. Am J Surg 1 9–19

    Google Scholar 

  6. TA Emam TG Frank GB Hanna A Cuschieri (2001) ArticleTitleInfluence of handle design on the surgeon’s upper limb movements, muscle recruitment, and fatigue during endoscopic suturing. Surg Endosc 7 667–672 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. GB Hanna SM Shimi A Cuschieri (1998) ArticleTitleTask performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 4 481–484 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199804000-00005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. LF Horgan DC O’Rionda N Doctor (1997) ArticleTitleNeoropraxia following laparoscopic procedures: an occupational injury. Min Inv Ther Allied Technol 6 33–35

    Google Scholar 

  9. NT Nguyen HS Ho WD Smith C Philipps C Lewis RM Vera ParticleDe R Berguer (2001) ArticleTitleAn ergonomic evaluation of surgeons’ axial skeletal and upper extremity movements during laparoscopic and open surgery. Am J Surg 6 720–724 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00801-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. JG Person AJ Hodgson AG Nagy (2001) ArticleTitleAutomated high-frequency posture sampling for ergonomic assessment of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 9 997–1003

    Google Scholar 

  11. T Seitz J Balzulat H Bubb (2000) ArticleTitleAnthropometry and measurement of posture and motion. Int J Indust Ergonomics 25 447–453 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00028-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. MA Veelen Particlevan JJ Jakimowicz RHM Goossens DW Meijer JBJ Bussmann (2002) ArticleTitleEvaluation of the usability of two types of image display systems during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 16 674–678 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-9116-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383jsVequg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11972213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Vereczkei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vereczkei, A., Feussner, H., Negele, T. et al. Ergonomic assessment of the static stress confronted by surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 18, 1118–1122 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9157-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9157-y

Keywords

Navigation