Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other?

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Virtual reality (VR) simulators now have the potential to replace traditional methods of laparoscopic training. The aim of this study was to compare the VR simulator with the classical box trainer and determine whether one has advantages over the other. Methods: Twenty four novices were tested to determine their baseline laparoscopic skills and then randomized into the following three group: LapSim, box trainer, and no training (control). After 3 weekly training sessions lasting 30-min each, all subjects were reassessed. Assessment included motion analysis and error scores. Nonparametric tests were applied, and p < 0.05 was deemed significant. Results: Both trained groups made significant improvements in all parameters measured (p < 0.05). Compared to the controls, the box trainer group performed significantly better on most of the parameters, whereas the LapSim group performed significantly better on some parameters. There were no significant differences between the LapSim and box trainer groups. Conclusions: LapSim is effective in teaching skills that are transferable to a real laparoscopic task. However, there appear to be no substantial advantages of one system over the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DJ Anastakis G Regehr RK Reznick M Cusimano J Murnaghan M Brown C Hutchison (1999) ArticleTitleAssessment of technical skills transfer from the bench-training model to the human model. Am J Surg 117 167–170 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00327-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M Bridges DL Diamond (1999) ArticleTitleThe financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 177 28–32 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00289-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7lsV2jug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10037304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. J Chung J Sackier (1998) ArticleTitleA method of objectively evaluating improvements in laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 12 1117–1120 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900796 Occurrence Handle9716763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. A Darzi S Mackay (2002) ArticleTitleRecent advances in minimal access surgery. BMJ 324 31–34 Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.324.7328.31 Occurrence Handle11777804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. V Datta A Chang S Mackay A Darzi (2002) ArticleTitleThe relationship between motion analysis and surgical technical assessments. Am J Surg 184 70–73 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00891-7 Occurrence Handle12135725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. V Datta M Mandalia S Mackay A Chang N Cheshire A Darzi (2002) ArticleTitleRelationship between skill and outcome in the laboratory based model. Surgery 131 318–323 Occurrence Handle10.1067/msy.2002.120235 Occurrence Handle11894037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. A Derossis J Bothwell H Sigman G Fried (1998) ArticleTitleThe effect of practice on performance in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 12 1111–1116 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900795 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czosVCmtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9716762

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. AM Derossis GM Fried M Abrahamowicz HH Sigman JS Barkun JL Meakins (1998) ArticleTitleDevelopment of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175 482–487 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00080-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czgslOjuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9645777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. GM Fried AM Derossis J Bothwell HH Sigman (1999) ArticleTitleComparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance measured in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 13 1077–1081 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649901176 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FivVCjtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10556441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. A Gallagher RM Satava (2002) ArticleTitleVirtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills: learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 16 1746–1752 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jis1CisA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12140641

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. EC Hamilton DJ Scott JB Fleming RV Rege R Laycock PC Bergen ST Tesfay et al. (2001) ArticleTitleComparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 16 406–411 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-8149-z Occurrence Handle11928017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. J Hunter (1997) ArticleTitleThe learning curve in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 6 102–104

    Google Scholar 

  13. R Kirk (1998) ArticleTitleSurgical excellence—threats and opportunities. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80 IssueIDSuppl 256–259 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3nsFShtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10343557

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. R McCloy R Stone (2001) ArticleTitleVirtual reality in surgery. BMJ 323 912–915 Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.323.7318.912 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrmsFSitQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11668138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. R Reznick G Regehr H MacRae J Martin W McCulloch (1996) ArticleTitleTesting technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination. Am J Surg 173 226–230 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89597-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J Rosser L Rosser R Savalgi (1997) ArticleTitleSkill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132 200–204 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC1MvkvV0%3D Occurrence Handle9041927

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. DJ Scott PC Bergen RV Rege R Laycock ST Tesfay RJ Valentine DM Euhus et al. (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 191 272–283 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00339-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvktF2mtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10989902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. DJ Scott WN Young ST Tesfay WH Frawley RV Rege DB Jones (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic skills training. Am J Surg 182 137–142 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00669-9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrisl2isQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11574084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. N Taffinder SG Smith J Huber RC Russell A Darzi (1999) ArticleTitleThe effect of a second generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 13 1087–1092 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FivVCjug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10556444

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. J Torkington SG Smith BI Rees A Darzi (2000) ArticleTitleThe role of simulation in surgical training. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82 88–94 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3gslyhtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10743423

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. J Torkington SG Smith BI Rees A Darzi (2001) ArticleTitleSkill transfer from virtual reality to a real laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc 15 1076–1079 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnotV2jsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11727073

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Munz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munz, Y., Kumar, B., Moorthy, K. et al. Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? . Surg Endosc 18, 485–494 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9043-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9043-7

Keywords

Navigation