Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

UES Pressure During Phonation Using High-resolution Manometry and 24-h Dual-probe pH-metry in Patients with Muscle Tension Dysphonia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) is the pathological condition in which excessive tension of the (para)laryngeal musculature leads to a disturbed voice. This study was developed to investigate if differences in pressure in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) were present in patients with MTD in comparison with normal speakers. Concurrently, all patients were screened for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as an associated cause or aggravating factor in MTD. The study’s design was a prospective case-control study. Fourteen patients with MTD (mean age = 40.2 years, range = 22–62 years) and 14 adult controls (mean age = 33.9 years, range = 23–58 years) were studied. A water-perfusion assembly with 22 sensors was positioned to record pressures during phonation. The mean values of the phonation pressures at the UES were measured. All patients underwent a dual-probe 24-h ambulatory pH impedance in order to measure the pH and the height of the refluxes from the lower esophageal sphincter to the hypopharynx. There were no significant differences in the UES pressures of patients with MTD compared to those of normal speakers during phonation tasks and reading. Two patients were identified with GERD. In these patients the refluxate reached the UES but this did not influence the UES pressures. We conclude that this study was not able to detect differences in phonation-induced UES pressures between patients with MTD and normal speakers using a standard water-perfusion high-resolution manometry assembly. Future investigation should be focused on developing probes with closely spaced sensors in the hypopharynx and the esophagus in order to investigate if differences in UES pressures in these study populations are present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rubin J, Sataloff RT, Korovin g. Diagnosis and treatment of voice disorders. 3rd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morrison MD, Rammage LA. Muscle misuse voice disorders: description and classification. Acta Otolaryngol. 1993;113:428–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morrison MD, Nichol H, Rammage LA. Diagnostic criteria in functional dysphonia. Laryngoscope. 1986;96:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sama A, Carding PN, Price S, Kelly P, Wilson JA. The clinical features of functional dysphonia. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:458–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perera L, Hofmann C, Tatro L, Chai K, Kuribayashi S, Lawal A, Shaker R. Manometric evidence for a phonation-induced UES contractile reflex. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008;294:885–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koufman JA. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux diseases (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope. 1991;101(4 Pt 2 Suppl 53):1–78.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002;16:274–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koufman JA, Amin MR, Panetti M. Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:385–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Altman KW, Lazarus C. Current and emerging concepts in muscle tension dysphonia: a 30-month review. J Voice. 2005;19:261–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Torrico S, Kern M, Aslam M, Narayanan S, Kannappan A, Ren J, Sui Z, Hofman C, Shaker R. Upper esophageal sphincter function during gastroesophageal reflux events revisited. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2000;279:262–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vilkman E, Hurme P, Korkko P. External laryngeal frame function in voice production revisited: a review. J Voice. 1996;10:78–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Angsuwarangsee T, Morrison M. Extrinsic laryngeal muscular tension in patients with voice disorders. J Voice. 2002;16:333–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Lierde K, Dhaeseleer E, Wuyts F, Claeys S. The treatment of muscle tension dysphonia: comparison of two treatment techniques by means of an objective multiparameter approach. J Voice. 2010;24:294–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Lierde K, Bernart L, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberghe P. Outcome of manual voice therapy in four Dutch adults with persistent moderate to severe vocal hyperfunction: a pilot study. J Voice. 2004;18:467–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wuyts F, De Bodt M, Molenberghs G, Heylen L, Millet B, Van Lierde K, Raes J, Van de Heyning P. The Dysphonia Severity Index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43:796–809.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, Zullo T, Murry T. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:1549–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mesallam TA, Stemple JC, Sobeih TM, Elluru RG. Reflux symptom index versus reflux finding score. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007;116:436–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hakkesteegt MM, Brocaar MP, Mulder P, Feenstra L. The interobserver and test-retest variability of the Dysphonia Severity Index. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60:86–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Remacle M. The contribution of videolaryngostroboscopy in daily ENT practice. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1996;50:265–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Poburka BJ. A new stroboscopy rating form. J Voice. 1999;13:403–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Richter JE, DeMeester TR, Wu WC. Normal 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH values. Influence of study center, pH electrode and gender. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37:849–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gill C, Morrison MD. Esophagolaryngeal reflex in a porcine animal model. J Otolaryngol. 1998;27:76–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bove M, Cange L, Mansson I. 24-h pharyngeal pH monitoring in healthy volunteers: a normative study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;3:234–41.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Milstein CF, Hicks DM, Abelson TI, Richter JE, Vaezi MF. Prevalence of laryngeal irritation signs associated with reflux in asymptomatic volunteers: impact of endoscopic technique (rigid vs. flexible laryngoscope). Laryngoscope. 2005;115:2256–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Van Houtte E, Van Lierde K, Claeys S. Pathophysiology and treatment of muscle tension dysphonia: a review of the current knowledge. J Voice. 2011;25:202–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

    Evelyne Van Houtte, Kristiane Van Lierde, Evelien D’haeseleer & Sofie Claeys

  2. Department Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

    Evelyne Van Houtte & Sofie Claeys

  3. Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

    Bart Van Imschoot

Authors
  1. Evelyne Van Houtte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristiane Van Lierde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Evelien D’haeseleer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bart Van Imschoot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sofie Claeys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelyne Van Houtte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Houtte, E., Van Lierde, K., D’haeseleer, E. et al. UES Pressure During Phonation Using High-resolution Manometry and 24-h Dual-probe pH-metry in Patients with Muscle Tension Dysphonia. Dysphagia 27, 198–209 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9354-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9354-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation