Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pollinator diversity affects plant reproduction and recruitment: the tradeoffs of generalization

  • Plant Animal Interactions
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One outstanding and unsolved challenge in ecology and conservation biology is to understand how pollinator diversity affects plant performance. Here, we provide evidence of the functional role of pollination diversity in a plant species, Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicaceae). Pollinator abundance, richness and diversity as well as plant reproduction and recruitment were determined in eight plant populations. We found that E. mediohispanicum was generalized both at the regional and local (population) scale, since its flowers were visited by more than 100 species of insects with very different morphology, size and behaviour. However, populations differed in the degree of generalization. Generalization correlated with pollinator abundance and plant population size, but not with habitat, ungulate damage intensity, altitude or spatial location. More importantly, the degree of generalization had significant consequences for plant reproduction and recruitment. Plants from populations with intermediate generalization produced more seeds than plants from populations with low or high degrees of generalization. These differences were not the result of differences in number of flowers produced per plant. In addition, seedling emergence in a common garden was highest in plants from populations with intermediate degree of generalization. This outcome suggests the existence of an optimal level of generalizations even for generalized plant species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner PA (2001) Optimality modeling and fitness trade-offs, when should plants become pollinator specialists? Oikos 95:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster WS, Fenster CB, Dudash MR (2000) Pollination “principle” revisited: specialization, pollination syndromes, and the evolution of flowers. Det Norske Videnskaps—Akademi. I. Matematisk Naturvidenskapelige Klasse, Skriffe, Ny Serie, vol 39, pp 179–200

  • Arroyo MTK, Primack R, Armesto J (1982) Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of central Chile. I. Pollination mechanisms and altitudinal variation. Am J Bot 69:82–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashman TL, Knight TM, Steets JA, Amarasekare P, Burd M, Campbell D, Dudash M, Johnston M, Mazer SJ, Mitchell R, et al. (2004) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction. Ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85:2408–2421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melián CJ, Olesen JM (2003) The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:9383–9387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch J, Blas M (1994) Foraging behavior and pollinating efficiency of Osmia cornuta and Apis mellifera on almond (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae and Apidae). Appl Entomol Zool 29:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK (2005) EstimateS—statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, version 7.5, at http://www.purl.oclc.org/estimates

  • Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J (2004) Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85:2717–2727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner JK, Neumeier R (1995) Effects of black mustard population size on the taxonomic composition of pollinators. Oecologia 104:218–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devoto MD, Medan D, Montaldo NH (2005) Patterns of interaction between plants and pollinators along an enviromental gradient. Oikos 109:461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology, 3rd edn. Pergamon , Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson PM, Dudash R, Thomson JD (2004) Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:375–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin MJ, Gurevitch J (2001) Mantel test, spatial structure in field experiments. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 308–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez JM (2003) Herbivory reduces the strength of pollinator-mediated selection in the mediterranean herb Erysimum mediohispanicum: consequences for plant specialization. Am Nat 162:242–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez JM (2005) Non-additive effects of ungulates on the interaction between Erysimum mediohispanicum and its pollinators. Oecologia 143: 412–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez JM, Zamora R (1999) Generalization vs. specialization in the pollination system of Hormathophylla spinosa (Cruciferae). Ecology 80:796–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez JM, Zamora R (2006) Ecological factors that promote the evolution of generalization in pollination systems. In: Waser NM, Ollerton J (eds) Plant–pollinator interactions, from specialization to generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., pp 145–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez JM, Perfectti F, Camacho JPM (2006) Natural selection on Erysimum mediohispanicum flower shape, insights into the evolution of zygomorphy. Am Nat 168:531–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity, procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Entsminger DF (2005) EcoSim, Null models software for ecology, v 7.72 Acquired Intelligence Inc and Kesey-Bearm, at http://www.homepages.together.net/∼gentsmin/ecosim.htm

  • Herrera CM (1987a) Components of pollinator quality: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos 50:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (1987b) Componentes del flujo génico en Lavandula latifolia Medicus: polinización y dispersión de semillas. An Jard Bot Madr 44:49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (1996) Floral traits and plant adaptation to insect pollinators, A devil’s advocate approach. In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH (eds) Floral biology. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 65–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (2005) Plant generalization on pollinators, species property or local phenomenon? Am J Bot 92:13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson ID (2005) Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: species and community responses to altitude. Biol Rev 80:489–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hortal JP, Borges AV, Gaspas C (2006) Evaluating the performance of species richness estimators, sensitivity to sample grain size. J Anim Ecol 75:274–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SD, Steiner KE (2000) Generalization vs. specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends Ecol Evol 15:140–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordano P, Bascompte J, Olesen JN (2006) The ecological consequences of complex topology and nested structure in pollination webs. In: Waser NM, Ollerton J (eds) Plant–pollinator interactions, from specialization to generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., pp 173–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 270:955–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C, Williams NM, Thorp RW (2002) Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:16812–16816

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight TM, Steets JA, Vamosi JC, Mazer SJ, Burd M, et al (2005) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:467–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE (1997) Population size and density effects in pollination, pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. J Ecol 85:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longino JT, Coddington J, Colwell RK (2002) The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest, estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology 83:689–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2004) Ecological diversity and its measurements. 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medan D, Montaldo NH, Devoto M, Mantase A, Vasellati V, Roitman GG, Bartoloni NH (2002) Plant /pollinator relationships at two altitudes in the Andes of Mendoza, Argentina. Arct Antarc Alp Res 34:233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller DA (2005) Pollinator community structure and sources of spatial variation in plant–pollinator interaction in Clarkia xantiana spp. xantiana. Oecologia 142:28–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Motten AF, Campbell DR, Alexander DE, Miller HL (1981) Pollination effectiveness of specialist and generalist visitors to a North Carolina population of Claytonia virginica. Ecology 62:1278–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollerton J, Cranmer L (2002) Latitudinal trends in plant–pollinator interactions: are tropical plants more specialised? Oikos 98:340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollerton J, Johnson SD, Hingston AB (2006) Geographical variation in diversity and specificity of pollination systems. In: Waser NM, Ollerton J (eds) Plant–pollinator interactions, from specialization to generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., pp 283–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Price MV, Waser NM, Irwin RE, Campbell DR, Brody K (2005) Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study. Ecology 86:2106–2116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A (1996) The natural history of pollination. Timber Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D’Antonio CM, Milton SJ, Rejmánek M (2000) Plant invasions—the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev 75:63–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahli HF, Conner JK (2006) Characterizing ecological generalization in plant–pollination systems. Oecologia 148:365–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent RD, Otto SP (2006) The role of local species abundance in the evolution of pollinator attraction in flowering plants. Am Nat 167:67–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J (1980) Pollinator foraging behavior and gene dispersal in Senecio. Evolution 34:934–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1970) Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in Angiosperms. I. pollination mechanisms. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:307–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I (2003) Importance of habitat area and landscape context for species richness of bees and wasps in fragmented orchard meadows. Conserv Biol 17:1036–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Bürger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–1432

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez DP, Aizen MA (2003) Null model analyses of specialization in plant–pollinator interactions. Ecology 84:2493–2501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Ollerton J (2006) Plant–pollinator interactions, from specialization to generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.

  • Waser NM, Chitkka L, Price MV, Williams NM, Ollerton J (1996) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Pedro Jordano, Jeff Ollerton and Nick Waser for their useful comments on a preliminary version of this manuscript. We thank several specialists who kindly identified pollinator specimens: M. A. Alonso Zarazaga, R. Constantin, S. Fernández Gayubo, M. Goula, F. Gusenleitner, J. Háva, P. Leblanc, M. A. Marcos, J.C. Otero, A. Sánchez Ruiz, A. Sánchez Terrón, M. Schwarz, A. Tinaut, F. Vallhonrat and D. Ventura. The Ministerio de Medio Ambiente and Consejería de Medio Ambiente of the Junta de Andalucía granted permission to work in the Sierra Nevada National Park. The study was partially supported by the Spanish MCyT (BOS2003-09045, GLB2006-04883/BOS), and Junta de Andalucía PAI (RNM220 and CVI165).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José M. Gómez.

Additional information

Communicated by Florian Schiestl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gómez, J.M., Bosch, J., Perfectti, F. et al. Pollinator diversity affects plant reproduction and recruitment: the tradeoffs of generalization. Oecologia 153, 597–605 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0758-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0758-3

Keywords

Navigation