Abstract
This article examines the validity of a model to explain how humans learn to perform movements in environments with novel dynamics, including unstable dynamics typical of tool use. In this model, a simple rule specifies how the activation of each muscle is adapted from one movement to the next. Simulations of multijoint arm movements with a neuromuscular plant that incorporates neural delays, reflexes, and signal-dependent noise, demonstrate that the controller is able to compensate for changing internal or environment dynamics and noise properties. The computational model adapts by learning both the appropriate forces and required limb impedance to compensate precisely for forces and instabilities in arbitrary directions with patterns similar to those observed in motor learning experiments. It learns to regulate reciprocal activation and co-activation in a redundant muscle system during repeated movements without requiring any explicit transformation from hand to muscle space. Independent error-driven change in the activation of each muscle results in a coordinated control of the redundant muscle system and in a behavior that reduces instability, systematic error, and energy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bien Z, Xu JX (1998) Iterative learning control: analysis, design, integration and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Burdet E, Milner TE (1998) Quantization of human motions and learning of accurate movements. Biol Cybern 78: 307–318
Burdet E, Codourey A, Rey L (1998) Experimental evaluation of nonlinear adaptive controllers. IEEE Control Syst Mag 18: 39–47
Burdet E, Osu R, Franklin DW, Milner TE, Kawato M (2001) The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature 414: 446–449
Burdet E, Tee KP, Mareels I, Milner TE, Chew CM, Franklin DW, Osu R, Kawato M (2006) Stability and motor adaptation in human arm movements. Biol Cybern 94: 20–32
Carter RR, Crago PE, Keith MW (1990) Stiffness regulation by reflex action in the normal human hand. J Neurophysiol 64: 105–118
De Waal FBM (1999) Cultural primatology comes of age. Nature 399: 635–636
Donchin O, Francis JT, Shadmehr R (2003) Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: theory and experiments in human motor control. J Neurosci 23: 9032–9045
Emken JL, Benitez R, Sideris A, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2007) Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort. J Neurophysiol 97: 3997–4006
Franklin DW, Burdet E, Osu R, Kawato M, Milner TE (2003a) Functional significance of stiffness in adaptation of multijoint arm movements to stable and unstable dynamics. Exp Brain Res 151: 145–157
Franklin DW, Osu R, Burdet E, Kawato M, Milner TE (2003b) Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model. J Neurophysiol 90: 3270–3282
Franklin DW, So U, Kawato M, Milner TE (2004) Impedance control balances stability with metabolically costly muscle activation. J Neurophysiol 92: 3097–3105
Franklin DW, Liaw G, Milner TE, Osu R, Burdet E, Kawato M (2007a) Endpoint stiffness of the arm is directionally tuned to instability in the environment. J Neurosci 27: 7705–7716
Franklin DW, So U, Burdet E, Kawato M (2007) Visual feedback is not necessary for the learning of novel dynamics. PLoS ONE 2(12): e1336. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001336
Franklin DW, Burdet E, Tee KP, Osu R, Milner TE, Chee CM, Kawato M (2008) CNS learns stable, accurate, and efficient movements using a simple algorithm. J Neurosci 28(44): 11165–11173
Gomi H, Osu R (1998) Task-dependent viscoelasticity of human multijoint arm and its spatial characteristics for interaction with environments. J Neurosci 18(21): 8965–8978
Gribble PL, Ostry DJ (2000) Compensation for loads during arm movements using equilibriumpoint control. Exp Brain Res 135: 474–482
Guigon E, Baraduc P, Desmurget M (2007) Computational motor control: redundancy and invariance. J Neurophysiol 97: 331–347
Harris CM, Wolpert DM (1998) Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780–784
Hunter IW, Kearney RE (1982) Dynamics of human ankle stiffness: variation with mean ankle torque. J Biomech 15: 747–752
Izawa J, Rane T, Donchin O, Shadmehr R (2008) Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization. J Neurosci 28: 2883–2891
Katayama M, Kawato M (1993) Virtual trajectory and stiffness ellipse during multijoint arm movement predicted by neural inverse models. Biol Cybern 69: 353–362
Kawato M, Furukawa K, Suzuki R (1987) A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning of voluntary movement. Biol Cybern 57: 169–185
Kirsch RF, Boskov D, Rymer WZ (1994) Muscle stiffness during transient and continuous movements of cat muscle: perturbation characteristics and physiological relevance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 41: 758–770
Kuechle DK, Newman SR, Itoi E, Morrey BF, An KN (1997) Shoulder muscle moment arms during horizontal flexion and elevation. J Should Elb Surg 6(5): 429–439
Melendez-Calderon A, Masia L, Casadio M, Burdet E (2009) Force field compensation can be learned without proprioceptive error. In: Proceedings of the medical physics and biomedical engineering world congress
Milner TE, Franklin DW (2005) Impedance control and internal model use during the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics in humans. J Physiol 567(2): 651–664
Murray WM, Delp SL, Buchanan TS (1995) Variation of muscle moment arms with elbow and forearm position. J Biomech 28(5): 513–525
Newell KM, Vaillancourt DE, Sosnoff JJ (2006) Aging, complexity, and motor performance. In: Birren JE, Schaie KW, Abeles RP, Gatz M, Salthouse TA (eds) Handbook of the psychology of aging. Academic Press, San Diego
Nijhof EJ, Kouwenhoven E (2000) Simulation of multi-joint arm movements. In: Winters JM, Crago PE (eds) Biomechanics and neural control of posture and movement. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 363–372
Osu R, Burdet E, Franklin DW, Milner TE, Kawato M (2003) Different mechanisms involved in adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics. J Neurophysiol 90: 3255–3269
Osu R, Kamimura N, Iwasaki H, Nakano E, Harris CM, Wada Y, Kawato M (2004) Optimal impedance control for task achievement in the presence of signal-dependent noise. J Neurophysiol 92(2): 1199–1215
Rack PMH (1981) Limitations of somatosensory feedback in control of posture and movement. In: Brooks VB (ed) Motor control. Handbook of physiology, Sect. 1. The nervous system. American Physiological Society, pp 229–256
Selen LPJ, Beek PJ, van Dieen JH (2005) Can co-activation reduce kinematic variability? A simulation study. Biol Cybern 93: 373–381
Scheidt RA, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Conditt MA, Rymer WZ, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2000) Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. J Neurophysiol 84: 853–862
Schweighofer N, Spoelstra J, Arbib MA, Kawato M (1998) Role of the cerebellum in reaching movements in humans. II. A neural model of the intermediate cerebellum. Eur J Neurosci 10: 95–105
Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208–3224
Slifkin AB, Newell KM (1999) Noise, information transmission , and force variability. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25(3): 837–851
Slotine JJ, Li W (1991) Applied nonlinear control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R (2006) Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 4(6): e179. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040179
Stroeve S (1999) Impedance characteristics of a neuromusculoskeletal model of the human arm II. Movement control. Biol Cybern 81: 495–504
Sturman MM, Vaillancourt DE, Corcos DM (2005) Effects of aging on the regularity of physiological tremor. J Neurophysiol 93: 3064–3074
Tee KP (2003) A unified model of human motor adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics. MSc thesis, National University of Singapore
Tee KP, Burdet E, Chew CM, Milner TE (2004) A model of endpoint force and impedance in human arm movements. Biol Cybern 90: 368–375
Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R (2000) Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407: 742–747
Thoroughman KA, Taylor JA (2005) Rapid reshaping of human motor generalization. J Neurosci 25(39): 8948–8953
Todorov E, Jordan M (1998) Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements. J Neurophysiol 80(2): 696–714
Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5: 1226–1235
Trainin E, Meir R, Karniel A (2007) Explaining patterns of neural activity in the primary motor cortex using spinal cord and limb biomechanics models. J Neurophysiol 97: 3736–3750
Weir AAS, Chappell J, Kacelnik A (2002) Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows. Science 297: 981
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tee, K.P., Franklin, D.W., Kawato, M. et al. Concurrent adaptation of force and impedance in the redundant muscle system. Biol Cybern 102, 31–44 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-009-0348-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-009-0348-z