Abstract
On level ground, cycling is more economical than running, which in turn is more economical than walking in the high speed range. This paper investigates whether this ranking still holds when moving on a gradient, where the three modes are expected to be mainly facing the same burden, i.e. to counter gravity. By using data from the literature we have built a theoretical framework to predict the optimal mode as a function of the gradient. Cycling was found to be the mode of choice only below 10–15% gradient, while above it walking was the least expensive locomotion type. Seven amateur bikers were then asked to walk, run and ride on a treadmill at different gradients. The speed was set so as to maintain almost constant the metabolic demand across the different gradients. The results indicate that the "critical slope", i.e. the one above which walking is less expensive than cycling (and running), is about 13–15%. One subject was loaded during bipedal gaits with a bicycle-equivalent mass, to simulate to cross-country cycling situation. The critical slope was close to 20%, due to the higher metabolic cost of loaded walking and running. Part of the findings can be explained by the mechanically different paradigms of the three locomotion types.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott BC, Bigland B, Ritchie JM (1952) The physiological cost of negative work. J Physiol (Lond) 117:380–390
Alexander RMcN (2002) Work or force minimization as a criterion for the evolution of locomotion. World Congress of Biomechanics, Calgary
Ardigò LP, Minetti AE, Saibene F (1997) The mechanics and energetics of loaded locomotion. Abstract XXXIII, Congress IUPS, St. Petersburg, P042.07
di Prampero PE (1986) The energy cost of human locomotion on land and in water. Int J Sports Med 7:55–72
di Prampero PE (2000) Cycling on earth, in space, on the moon. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:345–360
Fenn WO (1930a) Frictional and kinetic factors in the work of sprint running. Am J Physiol 92:583–611
Fenn WO (1930b) Work against gravity and work due to velocity changes in running. Am J Physiol 93:433–462
Impellizzeri F, Sassi A, Rodriguez-Alonso M, Mognoni P, Marcora S (2002) Exercise intensity during off-road cycling competitions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:1808–1813
Margaria R (1938) Sulla fisiologia e specialmente sul consumo energetico della marcia e della corsa a varia velocità ed inclinazione del terreno. Atti Accad Nazional Lincei 7:299–368
Margaria R, Cerretelli P, Aghemo P, Sassi G (1963) Energy cost of running. J Appl Physiol 18:367–370
Minetti AE (1995) Optimum gradient of mountain paths. J Appl Physiol 79:1698–1703
Minetti AE, Ardigò LP, Saibene F (1993) Mechanical determinants of gradient walking energetics in man. J Physiol (Lond) 471:725–735
Minetti AE, Ardigò LP, Saibene F (1994a) Mechanical determinants of the minimum energy cost of gradient running in humans. J Exp Biol 195:211–225
Minetti AE, Ardigò LP, Saibene F (1994b) The transition between walking and running in humans: metabolic and mechanical aspects at different gradients. Acta Physiol Scand 150:315–323
Minetti AE, Pinkerton J, Zamparo P (2001) From bipedalism to bicyclism: evolution in energetics and biomechanics of historic bicycles. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1351–1360
Minetti AE, Moia C, Roi GS, Susta D, Ferretti G (2002) Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes. J Appl Physiol 93:1039–1046
Acknowledgements
Dr Pietro Mariano Casali is kindly thanked, for having enthusiastically supported the study. We declare that the experiments comply with the current Italian laws.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ardigò, L.P., Saibene, F. & Minetti, A.E. The optimal locomotion on gradients: walking, running or cycling?. Eur J Appl Physiol 90, 365–371 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-0882-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-0882-7