Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The progression of corrected myopia

  • Basic Science
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study seeks to demonstrate the existence of a feedback loop controlling myopia by comparing the prediction of a feedback model to the actual progression of corrected myopia. In addition to theoretical results, confirming clinical data are presented.

Methods

The refraction of 13 continuously corrected myopic eyes was collected over a period of time ranging from 4 to 9 years from the time of their first correction. Refractive data was collected in an optometry office from myopic young subjects from the general population in Boston. Subjects were myopes, ages 2 to 22 at the time of first correction selected randomly from a larger population. All individuals were fully corrected with lenses; new lenses were prescribed every time that their myopia increased by 0.25 diopters or more. Subjects wore their spectacle lenses during the followed period.

Results

Subjects exhibit a linear time course of myopia progression when corrected with lenses. The observed rate of myopia increase is 0.2 to 1.0 diopters/year, with a mean correlation coefficient r  = −0.971, p < 0.005.

Conclusions

This report establishes that feedback control theory applies to the clinical phenomenon of progressive myopia. Continuous correction of myopia results in a linear progression that increases myopia. The Laplace transformation of temporal refractive data to the s-domain simplifies the study of myopia and emmetropia. The feedback transfer function predicts that continuous correction of myopia results in a linear progression because continuous correction opens the feedback loop. This prediction is confirmed with all subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pan C, Ramamurthy D, Saw SM (2012) Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 32:3–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Medina A (1987) A model for emmetropization: predicting the progression of ametropia. Ophthalmologica 194:133–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Medina A (1987) A model for emmetropization: The effect of corrective lenses. Acta Ophthalmol 65:565–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer C, Mueller MF, Duncker GI, Meyer HG (1999) Experimental animal models are applicable to human juvenile-onset myopia. Surv Ophthalmol 4:93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Medina A, Fariza E (1993) Emmetropization as a first-order feedback system. Vis Res 33(1):21–26

  6. Zhao H, Wang R, Wu M, Jiang J (2011) Dynamic changes of ocular biometric parameters: a modified form-deprivation myopia model of young guinea pigs. Int J Ophthalmol 4:484–488

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Raviola E, Wiesel TN (1985) An animal model of myopia. N Engl J Med 312(25):1609–1615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Greene PR, Guyton DL (1986) Time course of rhesus lid-suture myopia. Exp Eye Res 42:529–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoyt CS, Stone RD, Fromer C, Billson FA (1981) Monocular axial myopia associated with neonatal eyelid closure in human infants. Am J Ophthalmol 9:197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ray WA, O'Day DM (1985) Statistical analysis of multi-eye data in ophthalmic research. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:1186–1188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goss DA (1987) Linearity of refractive change in childhood myopia progression. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 64:775–780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oakley KH, Young FA (1975) Bifocal control of myopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 52:738–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chung K, Mohidin N, O'Leary DJ (2002) Undercorrection of myopia enhances rather than inhibits myopia progression. Vision Res 42(22):2555–2559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Adler D, Millodot M (2006) The possible effect of undercorrection on myopic progression in children. Clin Exp Optom 89(5):315–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leung JT, Brown B (1999) Progression of myopia in Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren is slowed by wearing progressive lenses. Optom Vis Sci 76(6):346–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Berntsen DA, Sinnott LT, Mutti DO, Zadnik K (2012) A randomized trial using progressive addition lenses to evaluate theories of myopia progression in children with a high lag of accommodation. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:640–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vasudevana B, Esposito C, Petersona C, Coronado C, Ciuffreda K (2014) Under-correction of human myopia – is it myopigenic?: a retrospective analysis of clinical refraction data. J Optom 07:147–152

  18. Goss DA (1994) Effect of spectacle correction on the progression of myopia in children — a literature review. J Am Optom Assoc 65:117–128

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ong E, Grice K, Held R, Thorn F, Gwiazda J (1999) Effects of spectacle correction on the progression of myopia in children. Optom Vis Sci 76(6):363–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. The COMET Group (2013) Myopia stabilization and associated factors among participants in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:7871–7883

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pärssinen O, Kauppinen M, Viljanen A (2014) The progression of myopia from its onset at age 8–12 to adulthood and the influence of heredity and external factors on myopic progression. A 23-year follow-up study. Acta Ophthalmol 92(8):730–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Flitcroft DI (2014) Emmetropisation and the aetiology of refractive errors. Eye 28:169–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The author certifies that he has NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Medina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Medina, A. The progression of corrected myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253, 1273–1277 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-2991-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-2991-5

Keywords

Navigation