Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Differences in reading performance of patients with Drusen maculopathy and subretinal fibrosis after CNV

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate differences in reading performance and contrast sensitivity on patients with drusen maculopathy and subretinal fibrosis after CNV (choroidal neovascularisation).

Methods

136 patients (60 with drusen (D), 76 with fibrosis (F)) were studied. Patients were classified according to type of maculopathy and best-corrected visual acuity into groups D1 and F1 (LogMAR 0.2–0.4), groups D2 and F2 (LogMAR>0.4–0.7), and group F3 (LogMAR>0.7–1.3). Reading acuity (in LogRAD) and speed were examined with the Radner Reading charts and compared to the reading speed measured with the long paragraphs of the Zuercher Reading Test. Contrast sensitivity was measured with Pelli-Robson charts.

Results

The patients' distance visual acuity was comparable between the drusen and fibrotic CNV groups (D1 versus F1, D2 versus F2). The reading acuity of the corresponding groups D1 and F1 was also comparable, but F2 patients showed a statistically lower reading acuity than D2 patients (P=0.03). All reading speed measurements of the groups F1 and F2 were significantly worse than those of the corresponding groups D1 and D2 (P-values: 0.0005–0.02). The correlation of reading speed between the Radner and Zuercher texts was very high (r=0.73–0.94). The contrast sensitivity was significantly lower in all groups compared with group D1 (P<0.001), but comparable for groups F1, F2, and F3.

Conclusions

Despite comparable results in distance visual acuity, patients with subretinal fibrosis after CNV had a greater reduction in reading ability than the patients with drusen. The distance visual acuity measurements alone, therefore, underestimate the real-life conditions and impact of AMD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group (2000) Risk factors associated with age-related macular degeneration. A case-control study in the age-related eye disease study: age-related eye disease study report number 3. Ophthalmology 107(12):2224–2232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn S, Legge G, Luebker A (1995) Printed cards for measuring low-vision reading speed. Vis Res 35:1939–1944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alexander MF, Maguire MG, Lietman TM, Snyder JR, Elman MJ, Fine SL (1988) Assessment of visual function in patients with age-related macular degeneration and low visual acuity. Arch Ophthalmol 106(11):1543–1547

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Axer-Siegel R, Ehrlich R, Weinberger D et al (2004) Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation in high myopia in a clinical setting: visual outcome in relation to age at treatment. Am J Ophthalmol 138(4):602–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blumenkranz MS, Bressler NM, Bressler SB et al (2002) Verteporfin therapy for subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation in age-related macular degeneration: three-year results of an open-label extension of 2 randomized clinical trials-TAP Report No.5. Arch Ophthalmol 120(10):1307–1314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung ST, Mansfield JS, Legge GE (1998) Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision. Vis Res 38(19):2949–2962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chylack LT, Wolf JK, Singer DM et al (1993) The lens opacities classification system III. Arch Ophthalmol 111:831–836

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Elliot B, Patel B, Whitaker D (2001) Development of a reading speed test for potential vision measurements. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1945–1949

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ergun E, Maar N, Radner W, Barbazetto I, Schmidt Erfurt U, Stur M (2003) Scotoma size and reading speed in patients with subfoveal occult choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 110(1):65–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferris FL, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I (1982) New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 94:91–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammond CJ, Webster AR, Snieder H, Bird AC, Gilbert CE, Spector TD (2002) Genetic influence on early age-related maculopathy: a twin study. Ophthalmology 109(4):730–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hazel CA, Petre KL, Armstrong RA, Benson MT, Frost NA (2000) Visual function and subjective quality of life compared in subjects with acquired macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(6):1309–1315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanski JJ Clinical ophthalmology: a systemic approach. Butterworth-Heinemann, 4th edition, 199. pp 403–404

  14. Klaver CC, Assink JJ, van Leeuwen R, Wolfs RC, Vingerling JR, Stijnen T, Hofman A, de Jong PT (2001) Incidence and progression rates of age-related maculopathy: the Rotterdam Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42(10):2237–2241

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kleiner RC, Enger C, Alexander MF, Fine SL (1988) Contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 106(1):55–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krischer CC, Stein-Arsic M, Meissen R, Zihl J (1985) Visual performance and reading capacity of partially sighted persons in a rehabilitation center. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 62(1):52–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lacour M, Kiilgaard JF, Nissen MH (2002) Age-related macular degeneration: epidemiology and optimal treatment. Drugs Aging 19(2):101–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Legge GE, Ross JA, Isenberg LM, LaMay JM (1992) Psychophysics of reading. Clinical predictors of low-vision reading speed. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33(3):677–687

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Legge GE, Rubin GS, Pelli DG, Schleske MM (1985) Psychophysics of reading II. Low vision. Vis Res 25(2):253–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindner M, Grissemann H (1968) Zuercher Lesetest. Huber, Bern/Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mackensen G (1962) Die Untersuchung der Lesefähigkeit als klinische Funktionsprüfung. Fortschr Augenheilkd 12:344–379

    Google Scholar 

  22. McClure ME, Hart PM, Jackson AJ, Stevenson MR, Chakrayarthy U (2000) Macular degeneration: do conventional measurements of impaired visual function equate with visual disability? Br J Ophthalmol 84(3):244–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ (1984) The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 61:403–407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pesudovs K, Patel B, Bradbury JA, Elliott DB (2002) Reading speed test for potential central vision measurement. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 30(3):183–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Radner W, Obermayer W, Richter-Mueksch S, Willinger U, Velikay-Parel M, Eisenwort B (2002) The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed. Graefe Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240(6):461–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Radner W, Willinger U, Obermayer W, Mudrich C, Velikay-Parel M, Eisenwort B (1998) Eine neue Lesetafel zur gleichzeitigen Bestimmung von Lesevisus und Lesegeschwindigkeit. Klin Monatbl Augenheilkd 213:174–181. German

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sloan LL (1959) New test charts for the measurement of visual acuity at Fr and near distances. Am J Ophthalmol 48:807–813

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stangler-Zuschrott E (1990) Verminderte Lesegeschwindigkeit und rasche Ermüdbarkeit als Zeichen der gestörten Sehfunktion. Klein MBl Augenheilk 196:150–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sunness JS, Rubin GS, Applegate CA, Bressler NM, Marsh MJ, Hawkins BS, Haselwood D (1997) Visual function abnormalities and prognosis in eyes with age-related geographic atrophy of the macula and good visual acuity. Ophthalmology 104(10):1677–1691

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Whittaker SG, Lovie-Kitchin J (1993) Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci 70(1):54–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the “Jubiläumsfonds der österreichischen Nationalbank”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Radner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richter-Mueksch, S., Stur, M., Stifter, E. et al. Differences in reading performance of patients with Drusen maculopathy and subretinal fibrosis after CNV. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmo 244, 154–162 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-0063-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-0063-y

Keywords

Navigation