Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Teleneurology in stroke management: costs of service in different organizational models

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Telemedicine is in increasing use in clinical neuroscience such as acute stroke care, especially by applying remote audiovisual communication for patient evaluation. However, telephone consultation was also used linking stroke centres to smaller hospitals. We compared costs of telestroke services using audiovisual and telephone communication in different organizational models. Within a small network in Northern Bavaria video-based teleconsultation (VTC) and telephone advice (TA) was provided for evaluation of acute stroke patients on a weekly rotation. The costs of the admissions process with or without one of both methods of telemedicine were calculated and compared from the perspective of the spoke hospital. Different levels of service and network size were modelled and costs of transfers as well as loss of revenues were calculated. Yearly total labour costs were 415,000 € for an on-site service VTC-service compared to 61,000 € in an on-call service. Additional costs for one teleconsultation were 109.55 € in VTC and 49.82 € in TA (VTC/TA ratio 2.2). The ratio decreased to 0.8 when accounting for costs of transfer and loss of reimbursement for all patients transferred as transfer of patients to the stroke centre was more frequent after TA (9.1 vs. 14.9 %full-time on-site ser). Costs of one QALY gained by using VTC instead of TA ranged from 115.00 € to 515.86 € depending on the different models. In the first view TA looks like the less expensive method as it is easy to access and works without additional costs. When accounting for all disadvantages TA becomes slightly more expensive. In telestroke care VTC should be recommended as the method of choice also from an economic perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Audebert HJ, Kukla C, Clarmann von Clarnau S et al (2005) Telemedicine for safe and extended use of thrombolysis in stroke: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria. Stroke 36:287–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwamm LH, Holloway RG, Amarenco P et al (2009) A review of the evidence for the use of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 40:2616–2634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Switzer JA, Demaerschalk BM, Xie J, Fan L, Villa KF, Wu EQ (2013) Costeffectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospitals’ perspectives. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 6:18–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ehlers L, Müskens WM, Jensen LG, Kjølby M, Andersen G (2008) National use of thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke via telemedicine in Denmark: a model of budgetary impact and cost effectiveness. CNS Drugs 22:73–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Majersik JJ, Meurer WJ, Frederiksen SA et al (2012) Observational study of telephone consults by stroke experts supporting community tissue plasminogen activator delivery. Acad Emerg Med 19:E1027–E1034

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pervez MA, Silva G, Masrur S et al (2010) Remote supervision of IV-tPA for acute ischemic stroke by telemedicine or telephone before transfer to a regional stroke center is feasible and safe. Stroke 41:e18–e24

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Handschu R, Scibor M, Willaczek B, for the STENO Project et al (2008) Telemedicine in acute stroke: remote video examination compared to simple telephone consultation. J Neurol 255:1792–1797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meyer BC, Raman R, Hemmen T, Obler R, Zivin JA, Rao R, Thomas RG, Lyden PD (2008) Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol 7:787–795

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Handschu R, Littmann R, Reulbach U et al (2003) Telemedicine in emergency evaluation of acute stroke: interrater agreement in remote video examination with a novel multimedia system. Stroke 34:2842–2846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bavarian Bureau of Statistics: life expectancy by year. https://www.statistikdaten.bayern.de/genesis/online?language=de&sequenz=tabelleErgebnis&selectionname=12621-001z

  11. Luengo-Fernandez R, Gray AM, Bull L, Welch S, Cuthbertson F, Rothwell PM (2013) Oxford Vascular Study. Quality of life after TIA and stroke: ten-year results of the Oxford Vascular Study. Neurology 81:1588–1595

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zaidi SF, Jumma MA, Urra XN et al (2011) Telestroke-guided intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator treatment achieves a similar clinical outcome as thrombolysis at a comprehensive stroke center. Stroke 42:3291–3293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Audebert HJ, Boy S, Jankovits R et al (2008) Is mobile teleconsulting equivalent to hospital-based telestroke services? Stroke 39:3427–3430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Audebert H, Busse O (2010) Updates by the Stroke Society. Nervenarzt 81:776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Demaerschalk BM, Switzer JA, Xie J, Fan L, Villa KF, Wu EQ (2013) Cost utility of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks from societal perspective. Am J Manag Care 19:976–985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nelson RE, Saltzman GM, Skalabrin EJ, Demaerschalk BM, Majersik JJ (2011) The cost-effectiveness of telestroke in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 77:1590–1598

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Mrs Andrea Handschu, MSc, who reviewed all calculations and accountings in this manuscript and to Mrs Sonja Heinloth for editing the manuscript. The STENO-project was supported by a public grant of the Bavarian State Ministry of Health and Social Welfare.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest or any financial relationship to companies or products named in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to René Handschu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 36 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Handschu, R., Scibor, M., Nückel, M. et al. Teleneurology in stroke management: costs of service in different organizational models. J Neurol 261, 2003–2008 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7450-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7450-4

Keywords

Navigation