Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cancer risk estimates for gamma-rays with regard to organ-specific doses

Part II: Site-specific solid cancers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Part I of this study presented an analysis of the solid cancer mortality data for 1950–1997 from the Japanese life-span study of the A-bomb survivors to assess the cancer risk for γ-rays in terms of the organ-specific dose for all solid cancers combined. Compared to earlier analyses, considerably more curvature in the dose-effect relation is indicated by these computations, which now suggests a dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor of about 2. The computations are extended here in order to explore the site-specific solid cancer risks for various organs. A computational method has been developed whereby the site-specific cancer risks are all simultaneously computed with global age and gender effect modifiers. This provides a more parsimonious representation with fewer parameters and avoids the large relative standard errors which would otherwise result. The sensitivity of site-specific risks to the choices of the neutron RBE is examined. The site-specific risk estimates are quite sensitive to the neutron RBE for the least shielded organs such as the breast, bladder and oesophagus. For the deeper lying organs, such as the gallbladder, pancreas and uterus, the impact of the neutrons is much lower. With an assumed neutron RBE of 35, which is in line with results on low neutron doses in major past studies on rodents and which corresponds approximately to the current ICRP radiation weighting factor for neutrons, the neutrons appear to contribute about 40% of the observed excess cancer risk in the breast, i.e. the organ that is closest to the body surface. However, this neutron contribution fraction is only about 10% for deeper lying organs, such as the colon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The appendices of these reports give also results obtained in terms of organ-specific doses. But the numerical values are not readily comparable to each other or to the present results, because there have been further differences between the computations.

References

  1. Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL, Vaeth M, Mabuchi K (1996) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part 1. Cancer: 1950–1990. Radiat Res 146:1–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Preston DL, Shimizu Y, Pierce DA, Suyama A, Mabuchi K (2003) Studies of mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 13: solid cancer and noncancer disease mortality: 1950–1997. Radiat Res 160:381–407

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett B (2003) DS02: the new dosimetry system DS02 (in Japanese). Hiroshima Igaku (Journal of the Hiroshima Medical Association) 56:386

    Google Scholar 

  4. Walsh L, Rühm W, Kellerer AM (2004) Cancer risk estimates for gamma-rays with regard to organ-specific doses. Part I: All solid cancers combined. Radiat Environ Biophys 43:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kellerer AM, Walsh L, Nekolla EA (2002) Risk coefficients for γ-rays with regard to solid cancer. Radiat Environ Biophys 41:113–123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kellerer AM, Walsh L (2001) Risk estimation for fast neutrons with regard to solid cancer, Radiat Res 156:708–717

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pattison JE, Payne LC, Hugtenburg RP, Beddoe AH, Charles MW (2004) Experimental simulation of A-bomb γ-ray spectra: revisited. Radiat Prot Dosim 109:175–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Preston DL, Lubin JH, Pierce DA (1993) Epicure User’s Guide. HiroSoft International, Seattle

  9. Roesch WC (ed) (1987) US-Japan joint reassessment of atomic bomb radiation dosimetry in Hiroshima and Nagasaki—final report, vols. 1 and 2. Radiation Research Effects Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan

  10. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: BN Petrov, F Caski (eds) Proceedings of the second International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest, Hungary, Akademiai Kiado, pp 267–281

  11. Shellabarger CJ, Chmelevsky D, Kellerer AM (1980) Induction of mammary neoplasms in the Sprague-Dawley rat by 430 -keV neutrons and x-rays. J Natl Cancer Inst 64:821–832

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lafuma J, Chmelevsky D, Chameaud J, Morin M, Masse R, Kellerer AM (1989) Lung carcinomas in Sprague-Dawley rats after exposure to low doses of radon daughters, fission neutrons, or γ-rays. Radiat Res 119:230–245

    Google Scholar 

  13. ICRP (1991) Publication 60. The 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 21 (1–3). Pergamon Press, Oxford

  14. Rühm W, Walsh L, Kellerer AM (2004) The neutron effective dose to the A-bomb survivors. Technical report number TR 221 of the Radiobiological Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich. Radiat Environ Biophys (in press)

  15. Kellerer AM, Rühm W, Walsh L (2004) Accounting for radiation quality in the analysis of the solid cancer mortality among A-bomb survivors. Technical report number TR 223 of the Radiobiological Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich. Radiat Environ Biophys (in press)

  16. UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, vol.2, Annex I. Epidemiological evaluation of radiation-induced cancer. United Nations, New York, pp 297–450

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ralf Bigiel for valuable technical help in connection with both Parts I and II of this work. This paper makes use of the data obtained from the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF) in Hiroshima, Japan. RERF is a private foundation funded equally by the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare and the US Department of Energy through the US National Academy of Sciences. The conclusions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the scientific judgement of RERF or its funding agencies. This work was funded partially by the European Commission under contract FIGD–CT–2000–0079.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Walsh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walsh, L., Rühm, W. & Kellerer, A.M. Cancer risk estimates for gamma-rays with regard to organ-specific doses. Radiat Environ Biophys 43, 225–231 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-004-0263-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-004-0263-6

Keywords

Navigation