Abstract
Purpose
To investigate patients preferences concerning the duration of hospital stay after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery due to benign conditions.
Methods
This study included women who underwent gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery due to benign conditions between November 2010 and November 2011 at the University Medical Centre Mannheim, Germany. Only women undergoing laparoscopy with four incisions were included. Demographic parameters, type and duration of surgery, perioperative complications and duration of hospital stay were analysed. Women were contacted using a standardized telephone survey. The patients were interviewed regarding the duration of hospital stay and their preferences concerning this matter.
Results
A total of 141 patients fitted the inclusion criteria. Eighty-seven of them (61.7 %) were willing to take part in the study; 63 of the women (72.4 %) did not correctly remember the duration of hospital stay in detail; 40 patients (46.0 %) thought it was longer; and 23 of the patients (26.4 %) remembered a shorter stay. For 4 of the 87 women (4.6 %), the duration was too long, and for 14 (16.1 %), the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopy was too short. Women who considered the duration of hospital stay as too long underwent prior abdominal surgery significantly more often.
Conclusion
The majority of the patients did not remember the duration of hospital stay correctly. Additionally, more women considered inpatient treatment as too short compered to patients who rated inpatient treatment as too long.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jung YW, Kim YT, Lee DW, Hwang YI, Nam EJ, Kim JH, Kim SW (2010) The feasibility of scarless single-port transumbilical total laparoscopic hysterectomy: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 24(7):1686–1692. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0830-7
Cabrera S, Franco-Camps S, Garcia A, Verges R, Diaz-Feijoo B, Perez-Benavente MA, Poza JL, Bradbury M, Xercavins J, Gil-Moreno A (2010) Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in prolapsed uterus. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282(1):63–67. doi:10.1007/s00404-010-1472-7
Mebes I, Diedrich K, Banz-Jansen C (2012) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy without uterine manipulator at big uterus weight (>280 g). Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(1):131–134. doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2249-y
Aydeniz B, Schauf B, Kurek R, Schiebeler A, Riedinger K, Tepper-Wessels K, Messrogli H, Bastert G, Wallwiener D (2002) Surgical laparoscopy: further development and rates of complication. Zeitschirft für Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 62(3):269–273. doi:10.1055/s-2002-25222
Summitt RL Jr, Stovall TG, Lipscomb GH, Ling FW (1992) Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol 80(6):895–901
Chou DC, Rosen DM, Cario GM, Carlton MA, Lam AM, Chapman M, Johns C (1999) Home within 24 hours of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 39(2):234–238
Thiel J, Gamelin A (2003) Outpatient total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10(4):481–483
Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB (2009) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD003677. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4
Lovatsis D, Jose JB, Tufman A, Drutz HP, Murphy K (2007) Assessment of patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management after ambulatory gynaecologic laparoscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 29(8):664–667
Juhasz-Boss I, Haggag H, Baum S, Kerl S, Rody A, Solomayer E (2012) Laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches for endometrial cancer treatment: a comprehensive review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(1):167–172. doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2254-1
de Lapasse C, Rabischong B, Bolandard F, Canis M, Botchorischvili R, Jardon K, Mage G (2008) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and early discharge: satisfaction and feasibility study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(1):20–25. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2007.08.608
Lieng M, Istre O, Langebrekke A, Jungersen M, Busund B (2005) Outpatient laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with assistance of the lap loop. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(3):290–294. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2005.03.013
Morrison JE Jr, Jacobs VR (2004) Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy in a rural ambulatory surgery center. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(3):359–364
Gauta J (2011) Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy: evaluation of pain. JSLS 15(3):346–349. doi:10.4293/108680811X13125733356558
Gien LT, Kupets R, Covens A (2011) Feasibility of same-day discharge after laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 121(2):339–343. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.344
Widmaier U, Karrer M, Schoenberg MH (2007) “Fast-track” and elective, laparoscopic colo-rectal surgery. Zentralbl Chir 132(4):342–348. doi:10.1055/s-2007-981204 discussion 348-349
Dobbs SP, Davies Q, Maplethorpe RM, Tierney R, Hammond RH (1998) Patient satisfaction with daycase laparoscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol 18(5):471–473. doi:10.1080/01443619866813
Gallinat A, Nugent W, Lueken RP, Moller CP, Busche D (1994) Gynecologic laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in a day clinic: trends and perspectives. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1(2):103–110
Radosa MP, Winzer H, Mothes AR, Camara O, Diebolder H, Weisheit A, Runnebaum IB (2012) Laparoscopic myomectomy in peri- and post-menopausal women is safe, efficacious and associated with long-term patient satisfaction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 162(2):192–196. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.024
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tuschy, B., Berlit, S., Sütterlin, M. et al. Duration of hospital stay after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery: preferences of patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288, 335–339 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2733-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2733-z