Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Duration of hospital stay after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery: preferences of patients

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate patients preferences concerning the duration of hospital stay after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery due to benign conditions.

Methods

This study included women who underwent gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery due to benign conditions between November 2010 and November 2011 at the University Medical Centre Mannheim, Germany. Only women undergoing laparoscopy with four incisions were included. Demographic parameters, type and duration of surgery, perioperative complications and duration of hospital stay were analysed. Women were contacted using a standardized telephone survey. The patients were interviewed regarding the duration of hospital stay and their preferences concerning this matter.

Results

A total of 141 patients fitted the inclusion criteria. Eighty-seven of them (61.7 %) were willing to take part in the study; 63 of the women (72.4 %) did not correctly remember the duration of hospital stay in detail; 40 patients (46.0 %) thought it was longer; and 23 of the patients (26.4 %) remembered a shorter stay. For 4 of the 87 women (4.6 %), the duration was too long, and for 14 (16.1 %), the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopy was too short. Women who considered the duration of hospital stay as too long underwent prior abdominal surgery significantly more often.

Conclusion

The majority of the patients did not remember the duration of hospital stay correctly. Additionally, more women considered inpatient treatment as too short compered to patients who rated inpatient treatment as too long.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jung YW, Kim YT, Lee DW, Hwang YI, Nam EJ, Kim JH, Kim SW (2010) The feasibility of scarless single-port transumbilical total laparoscopic hysterectomy: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 24(7):1686–1692. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0830-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cabrera S, Franco-Camps S, Garcia A, Verges R, Diaz-Feijoo B, Perez-Benavente MA, Poza JL, Bradbury M, Xercavins J, Gil-Moreno A (2010) Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in prolapsed uterus. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282(1):63–67. doi:10.1007/s00404-010-1472-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mebes I, Diedrich K, Banz-Jansen C (2012) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy without uterine manipulator at big uterus weight (>280 g). Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(1):131–134. doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2249-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aydeniz B, Schauf B, Kurek R, Schiebeler A, Riedinger K, Tepper-Wessels K, Messrogli H, Bastert G, Wallwiener D (2002) Surgical laparoscopy: further development and rates of complication. Zeitschirft für Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 62(3):269–273. doi:10.1055/s-2002-25222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Summitt RL Jr, Stovall TG, Lipscomb GH, Ling FW (1992) Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol 80(6):895–901

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chou DC, Rosen DM, Cario GM, Carlton MA, Lam AM, Chapman M, Johns C (1999) Home within 24 hours of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 39(2):234–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thiel J, Gamelin A (2003) Outpatient total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10(4):481–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB (2009) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD003677. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4

  9. Lovatsis D, Jose JB, Tufman A, Drutz HP, Murphy K (2007) Assessment of patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management after ambulatory gynaecologic laparoscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 29(8):664–667

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Juhasz-Boss I, Haggag H, Baum S, Kerl S, Rody A, Solomayer E (2012) Laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches for endometrial cancer treatment: a comprehensive review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(1):167–172. doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2254-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Lapasse C, Rabischong B, Bolandard F, Canis M, Botchorischvili R, Jardon K, Mage G (2008) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and early discharge: satisfaction and feasibility study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(1):20–25. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2007.08.608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lieng M, Istre O, Langebrekke A, Jungersen M, Busund B (2005) Outpatient laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with assistance of the lap loop. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(3):290–294. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2005.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morrison JE Jr, Jacobs VR (2004) Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy in a rural ambulatory surgery center. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(3):359–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gauta J (2011) Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy: evaluation of pain. JSLS 15(3):346–349. doi:10.4293/108680811X13125733356558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gien LT, Kupets R, Covens A (2011) Feasibility of same-day discharge after laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 121(2):339–343. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Widmaier U, Karrer M, Schoenberg MH (2007) “Fast-track” and elective, laparoscopic colo-rectal surgery. Zentralbl Chir 132(4):342–348. doi:10.1055/s-2007-981204 discussion 348-349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dobbs SP, Davies Q, Maplethorpe RM, Tierney R, Hammond RH (1998) Patient satisfaction with daycase laparoscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol 18(5):471–473. doi:10.1080/01443619866813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gallinat A, Nugent W, Lueken RP, Moller CP, Busche D (1994) Gynecologic laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in a day clinic: trends and perspectives. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1(2):103–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Radosa MP, Winzer H, Mothes AR, Camara O, Diebolder H, Weisheit A, Runnebaum IB (2012) Laparoscopic myomectomy in peri- and post-menopausal women is safe, efficacious and associated with long-term patient satisfaction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 162(2):192–196. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Tuschy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tuschy, B., Berlit, S., Sütterlin, M. et al. Duration of hospital stay after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery: preferences of patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288, 335–339 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2733-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2733-z

Keywords

Navigation