Skip to main content
Log in

Randomized trial of oral versus sublingual misoprostol 24 h after mifepristone for medical abortion

  • Materno-fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the efficacy, side effects, and acceptability of medical abortion using oral mifepristone (200 mg) followed 24 h later by oral or sublingual misoprostol (400 μg).

Materials and methods

A total of 93 women with pregnancies up to 56 days of gestational age were assigned to two groups according to the different misoprostol regimen (group I 400 μg orally and group II 400 μg sublingually). The principle outcome measure was complete abortion defined as a complete expulsion of intrauterine contents without a need for surgical intervention 7 days after the procedure.

Results

Successful abortion occurred in 87.5% of patients in group 1 and 95.5% patients in group 2 (p = 0.166, 95% CI −0.194, 0.033). The patient acceptability and satisfaction rates were similar in both the groups.

Conclusion

It is concluded that 400 μg of sublingual misoprostol is as effective as oral misoprostol 24 h after mifepristone for medical abortion of ≤56 days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saxena P, Salhan S, Sarda N (2004) Comparison between the sublingual and oral route of misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming in first trimester abortions. Hum Reprod 1(1):77–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation (2000) Comparison of two doses of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol for early medical abortion: a randomized trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 107:524–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tang OS, Chan C, Ng E, Lee S, Ho P (2003) A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on the use of mifepristone with sublingual or vaginal misoprostol for medical abortions of less than 9 weeks gestation. Hum Reprod 18(11):2315–2318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schaff EA, Fielding SL, Westhoff C, Ellertson C, Eisinger SH, Stadalius LS (2000) Vaginal misoprostol administered 1, 2, or 3 days after mifepristone for early medical abortion. JAMA 284:1948–1953

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. von Hertzen H, Piaggio G, Marions L (2008) Comparison of two doses and two routes of administration of misoprostol after pre-treatment with mifepristone for early pregnancy termination. Reprod Health 5(2). doi:10.1186/1742-4755-5-2

  6. Vimala N, Mittal S, Kumar S (2004) Sublingual misoprostol before first trimester abortion: a comparative study using two dose regimens. Indian J Med Sci 58:54–61

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Spitz IM, Bardin CW, Benton L, Robbins A (1998) Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States. N Engl J Med 338:1241–1247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang OS, Schweer H, Seyberth HW, Lee SW, Ho PC (2002) Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration of misoprostol. Hum Reprod 17:332–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang OS, Xu J, Cheng L, Lee SWH, Ho PC (2002) Pilot study on the use of sublingual misoprostol with mifepristone in termination of first trimester pregnancy up to 9 weeks of gestation. Hum Reprod 17:1738–1740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamoda H, Ashok PW, Flett GM, Templeton A (2005) A randomised controlled trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation. BJOG 112:1102–1108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Creinin MD, Fox MC, Teal S, Chen A, Schaff EA, Meyn LA, MOD Study Trial Group (2004) A randomized comparison of misoprostol 6 to 8 hours versus 24 hours after mifepristone for abortion. Obstet Gynecol 103(51):851–859

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Von Hertzen H, Honkanen H, Piaggio G, Bartfai G, Erdenetungalag R, Gemzell-Danielsson K (2003) WHO multinational study of three misoprostol regimens after mifepristone for early medical abortion. I: Efficacy. BJOG 110(9):808–818

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guest J, Chien PFW, Thomson MAR, Kosseim ML (2007) Randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of same-day administration of mifepristone and misoprostol for termination of pregnancy with the standard 36 to 48 hour protocol. BJOG 114(2):207–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Winikoff B, Dzuba IG, Creinin MD, Crowden WA, Goldberg AB, Gonzales J (2008) Two distinct routes of administration of misoprostol in mifepristone medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1303–1310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schaff EA, Eisinger SH, Stadalius LS, Franks P, Gore BZ, Poppema S (1999) Low-dose mifepristone, 200 mg, and vaginal misoprostol for induced abortion. Contraception 59:1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Raghavan S, Comendant R, Digol I, Ungureanu S, Friptu V, Bracken H, Winikoff B (2009) Two pill regimens of misoprostol after mifepristone medical abortion through 63 days’ gestational age: a randomized controlled trial of sublingual and oral misoprostol. Contraception 7(2):84–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Akin A, Dabash R, Dilbaz B, Aktun H, Dursun P, Kiran S, Aksan G, Dogan B, Winikoff B (2009) Increasing women’s choices in medical abortion: a study of misoprostol 400 μg swallowed immediately or held sublingually following 200 mg mifepristone. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 14(3):169–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fjerstad M, Sivin I, Lichtenberg ES, Trussell J, Cleland K, Cullins V (2009) Effectiveness of medical abortion with mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 59 gestational days. Contraception 80(3):282–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Faucher P, Baunot N, Madelenat P (2005) The efficacy and acceptability of mifepristone medical abortion with home administration misoprostol provided by private providers linked with the hospital: a prospective study of 433 patients. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 33(4):220–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishna Dahiya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dahiya, K., Mann, S. & Nanda, S. Randomized trial of oral versus sublingual misoprostol 24 h after mifepristone for medical abortion. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284, 59–63 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1590-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1590-2

Keywords

Navigation