Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality of care, maternal attitude and common physician practices across the socio-economic spectrum: a community survey

  • Materno-fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the quality of maternity care, women’s perception of the quality of care and factors influencing the same in Delhi.

Method

Women who delivered a viable live birth in the past 6 months were recruited from South Delhi by a two-stage stratified cluster randomized sampling. In stage 1, two colonies each from three predefined economic strata (high-, middle- or low-income areas) were selected by simple-random sampling. In stage 2, a sequential house-to-house survey was conducted in each selected colony. The information was collected by interview and review of medical records.

Results

A total of 5,279 houses were screened to recruit 249 subjects. Several disparities were notable. 25.2 and 14.8% of the women from middle- and lower-income areas delivered by cesarean section, while the rate was 53.6% in the higher-income areas. In women from lower-income areas urine testing was not done in 76.9% and blood sugar was not tested in 18.2%, while in high-income areas 44.6% had ≥10 antenatal visits and 87.8% had ≥3 ultrasounds. Of the women who experienced labor only 11% received support from a friend or family member, 4.4% received any medicine/measures for pain relief, 44.3% were allowed to walk and 14.6% were catheterized.

Conclusion

Health care providers are unable to meet national minimal care standards in poorer areas, while over investigation and over intervention appear prevalent in higher-income areas. This warrants a more representative evaluation to enable more equitable and evidence-based practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Steffen GE (1988) Quality medical care. A definition. JAMA 260:56–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Institute of Medicine, Committee to Design a Strategy for Quality Review and Assurance in Medicine (1990) In: Lohr KN (ed) Medicare: a strategy for quality assurance/Committee to Design a Strategy for Quality Review and Assurance in Medicare, Division of Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine. Report of a study, vol 1. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, p 468

  3. Choudhry MTM (2005) Maternal mortality and quality of maternity care: implications for Pakistan. Thesis for degree of master in health promotion. http://openmed.nic.in/1370/01/My_Thesis.pdf

  4. Proctor S (1998) What determines quality in maternity care? Comparing the perceptions of childbearing women and midwives. Birth 25(2):85–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hundley V, Penney G, Fitzmaurice A, van Teijlingen E, Graham W (2002) A comparison of data obtained from service providers and service users to assess the quality of maternity care. Midwifery 18(2):126–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sakala C, Corry MP (2007) Listening to Mothers II reveals maternity care quality chasm. J Midwifery Womens Health 52:183–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-2 India, Main Report. http://www.nfhsindia.org/data/india/indch9.pdf. Accessed 30 Jun 2007

  8. Report on the District Level Household Survey 2002–2004. http://www.rchindia.org/dlhs_india.htm. Accessed 05 Jul 2007

  9. Reproductive and Child Health Program. http://www.rchindia.org/. Accessed 5 Jul 2007

  10. Dhar Sengupta R, Nagpal J, Sinha S, Bhargava VL, Sachdeva A, Bhartia A (2009) Direct cost of maternity care services in South Delhi: a community survey. J Health Popul Nutr 27(3):368–378

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nagpal J, Dhar Sengupta R, Sinha S, Bhargava VL, Sachdeva A, Bhartia A (2008) An exploratory study to evaluate the utility of an adapted Mother Generated Index (MGI) in assessment of postpartum quality of life in India. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:107

    Google Scholar 

  12. National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-3 India. http://www.nfhsindia.org/nfhs3.html. Accessed 12 Jan 2008

  13. Listening to mother’s survey, questionnaire. http://www.childbirthconnection.com/pdf.asp?PDFDownload=LtMquestionnaire. Accessed 12 Jan 2008

  14. A guide to monitoring and evaluating adolescent reproductive health programs. Part I: The how-to’s of monitoring and evaluation. Appendix 2: How to calculate sample size requirements. http://www.fhi.org/NR/rdonlyres/e3h3wstdemc5e4gxbthsmvs2swl7a23uj7kbdscinx7swrivgvs2el75xu4kktbfr7mlzqstkxa6ra/Appendices24.pdf. Accessed 16 Jun 2009

  15. Idanpaan-Heikkila UM, Lambie L, Mattke S et al (2006) Selecting indicators for the quality of cardiac care at the health system level in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Int J Qual Health Care 18:39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. National Diabetes Quality Improvement Alliance Performance measure set for adult diabetes. http://www.nationaldiabetesalliance.org/Final2005Measures.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2006

  17. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. NICE guideline (2006). http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=334322. Accessed 23 Aug 2007

  18. National Population Policy (2000) http://www.whoindia.org/LinkFiles/Policy_Population-Policy.pdf. Accessed 5 Jul 2007

  19. World Health Organization (1985) Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 2:436–437

    Google Scholar 

  20. Indian Council of Medical Research (1990) Collaborative study on high risk pregnancies and maternal mortality (ICMR task force study). ICMR, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sreevidya S, Sathiyasekaran BWC (2003) High caesarean rates in Madras (India): a population-based cross-sectional study. BJOG 110:106–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mishra US, Mala R (2002) Delivery-related complications and determinants of caesarean section rates in India. Health Policy Plan 17(1):90–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5th edn. http://www.acog.org/bookstore/Guidelines_for_Perinatal_Care__P262C54.cfm. Accessed 12 Aug 2007

  24. Hundley V, Rennie AM, Fitzmaurice A et al (2000) A national survey of women’s views of their maternity care in Scotland. Midwifery 16:303–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cesarean section: Clinical guideline (2004) National Collaborating Center for Women’s and Children’s Health. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG13/guidance/pdf/English. Accessed 30 Jul 2007

  26. Annual Report of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (2006–2007) http://mohfw.nic.in/annualrep%20english/Contents.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2008

  27. Bruce J (1990) Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plann 21:61–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lothian JA (2003) Listening to mothers—the first national U.S. survey of women’s childbearing experiences. J Perinat Educ 12:vi–viii

    Google Scholar 

  29. Qian X, Smith H, Liang H et al (2006) Evidence-informed obstetric practice during normal birth in China: trends and influences in four hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res 6:29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hildingsson I, Thomas JE (2007) Women’s perspectives on maternity services in Sweden: processes, problems, and solutions. J Midwifery Womens Health 52:126–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the research teams for their efforts. The study was supported by intramural funding from Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research. Approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (No. 04/2007, Dated 9/9/2007)

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhishek Bhartia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dhar , R.S., Nagpal, J., Bhargava, V. et al. Quality of care, maternal attitude and common physician practices across the socio-economic spectrum: a community survey. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282, 245–254 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1214-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1214-x

Keywords

Navigation