Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abdominal vs vaginal hysterectomy: a comparative study of the postoperative quality of life and satisfaction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To compare the short-term results of the quality of life and satisfaction of patients submitted to total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and vaginal hysterectomy (VH) for benign uterine disease. Methods: Women referred for hysterectomy for uterine myoma were randomized to TAH (n=30) or VH (n=30). The exclusion criteria were uterine prolapse, indication associated surgical procedures and uterine size ≥300 cm3. After a month, follow-up questionnaires had a response rate of 100%, and consisted of an interview with application of SF-36 questionnaire (functional capacity, physical aspect and pain) and evaluation of satisfaction rate. Results: There were no differences in the patients’ mean age, parity, body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin levels and uterine size between groups. Lower postoperative quality-of-life scores were found in the TAH group when compared to the VH group in functional capacity (P=0.002), physical aspect (P=0.008) and pain (P=0.002). The general satisfaction rate with the surgery was similar in the two groups of patients (P=0.147). However, a higher rate of patients submitted to VH would choose the same therapeutic modality (65.5 vs 90%; P=0.021). Conclusions: A better postoperative quality of life (functional capacity, physical aspect and pain) and higher satisfaction rate was found in the VH when compared to TAH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R (1994) Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988–1990. Obstet Gynecol 83:549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Silva-Filho AL, Reis FM, Noviello MB, Santos-Filho AS, Cândido EB, Triginelli AS (2004) Factors influencing the operative time and complications of vaginal hysterectomy on non-prolapsed uterus. J Pelvic Med Surg 10:257–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dorsey JH, Holtz PM, Griffiths RI (1996) Cost and changes associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy. N Engl J Med 335:476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rannestad T (2005) Hysterectomy: effects on quality of life and psychological aspects. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 19:419–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health status survey (SF-36). 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu JFR, Sherbourne CD (1993) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31:247–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu JFR (1994) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 32:40–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Richardson EH (1929) Simplified technique for abdominal panhysterectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 48:248–256

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heaney NS (1934) A report of 565 vaginal hysterectomies performed for benign pelvic disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 28:751

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W (1998). Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Rev Bras Reumatol 39:143–150

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BM, Filtenborg T, Gluud C, Tabor A (2003) Randomised controlled trial of total compared with subtotal hysterectomy with one-year follow up results. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 110:1088–1098

    Google Scholar 

  12. Van Den E, Glasser M, Mathais SD, Colwell HH, Pasta DJ, Kunz K (1998) Quality of life health care utilization and costs among women undergoing hysterectomy in a managed care setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178:91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Benassi L, Rossi T, Kaihura CT (2002) Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sheth SS (2004) The scope of vaginal hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 115:224–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ribeiro SC, Ribeiro RM, Santos NC, Pinotti JA (2003) A randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet 83:37–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rannestad T, Eikeland O-J, Helland H, Qvarnstrom U (2001) The quality of life in women suffering from gynecological disorders is improved by means of hysterectomy. Absolute and relative differences between pre- and postoperative measures. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:46–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Figueiredo O, Figueiredo EG, Figueiredo PG, Pelosi MA III, Pelosi MA (1999) Vaginal removal of the benign nonprolapsed uterus: experience with 300 consecutive operations. Obstet Gynecol 94:348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnaldo L. Silva-Filho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silva-Filho, A.L., Werneck, R.A., de Magalhães, R.S. et al. Abdominal vs vaginal hysterectomy: a comparative study of the postoperative quality of life and satisfaction. Arch Gynecol Obstet 274, 21–24 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0118-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0118-7

Keywords

Navigation