Skip to main content
Log in

Double or triple interlocking when nailing proximal tibial fractures? A biomechanical investigation

  • Basic Science
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To determine whether there are differences in stability between double and triple interlocked intramedullary nails used for the fixation of extraarticular proximal tibial fractures.

Design

Randomized in vitro biomechanical-experimental laboratory investigation.

Setting

Biomechanics laboratory of the Clinic for Trauma Surgery at the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz.

Intervention

A 10-mm defect osteotomy was performed on six paired human tibiae, and the proximal and distal ends were potted in polymethylmethacrylate cement (PMMA). Each pair of bones was randomly stabilized with an intramedullary nail (IM-nail) with two interlocking options (PTN 2s) in one tibia, and with an IM-nail with three interlocking options (PTN 3s) in the corresponding contralateral bone. A biomechanical test of the bone implant construct was then performed with an axial force of 900 N. Displacement of bone fragments was measured and depicted as a force–displacement diagram.

Main outcome measurements

Biomechanical construction stiffness.

Results

The stiffness values for PTN 3s were significantly higher than for PTN 2s. In the group of PTN 2s, two out of six implants failed biomechanically with breakage of one proximal interlocking screw.

Conclusions

Given the parameters of this investigation, triple proximal interlocking provides more stability in nailed proximal tibia fractures than double proximal interlocking. Larger series with clinical follow-up after triple proximal interlocking in tibial nailing should be undertaken to further clarify these questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bolhofner BR (1995) Indirect reduction and composite fixation of extraarticular proximal tibia fractures. Clin Orthop 315:75–83h

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buehler KC, Green J, Woll TS, Duwelius PJ (1997) A technique for intramedullary nailing of proximal third tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma 11:218–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cole JD (1998) Intramedullary fixation of proximal tibia fractures. Techniques in Orthop 13:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dendrinos GK, Kontos S, Katsenis D, Dalas A (1996) Treatment of high-energy tibial plateau fractures by the Ilizarov circular fixator. J Bone Joint Surg (Br.) 78:710–717

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Duda G, Mandruzzato F, Heller M et al (2002) Mechanical conditions in the internal stabilization of proximal tibial defects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 17:64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Freedman EL, Johnson EE (1995) Radiographic analysis of tibia fracture malalignment following intramedullary nailing. Clin Orthop 315:25–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerber A, Ganz R (1998) Combined internal and external osteosynthesis. A biological approach to the treatment of complex fractures of the proximal tibia. Injury 29(Suppl 3):22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen M, Blum J, Mehler D, Rommens PM (2002) Intramedullary osteosynthesis of metadiaphyseal proximal tibial fractures: an optimized implant geometry can help to solve the problem. Osteosynth Trauma Care 10:188–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen M, Mehler D, Voltmer W, Rommens PM (2002) The extraarticular proximal tibial fracture. Unfallchirurg 105:858–873 (in German)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen M, Mehler D, Hessmann MH, Blum J, Rommens PM (2007) Intramedullary stabilization of extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a biomechanical comparison of intramedullary and extramedullary implants including a new Proximal Tibial Nail (PTN). J Orthop Trauma 10:701–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmeier P, Stephan C, Moehlmann U, Tscherne H (1999) The mechanical effect of blocking screws (“Poller screws”) in stabilising tibia fractures with short proximal or distal fragments after insertion of small diameter intramedullary nails. J Orthop Trauma 13:550–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laflamme GY, Heimlich D, Stephen D, Kreder HJ, Whyne CM (2003) Proximal tibial fracture stability with intramedullary nail fixation using oblique interlocking screws. J Orthop Trauma 17:496–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lang GJ, Cohen BE, Bosse MJ, Kellam JF (1995) Proximal third tibia fractures—should they be nailed? Clin Orthop 315:64–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marsh JL, Smith ST, Do TT (1995) External fixation and limited internal fixation for complex fractures of the tibial plateau. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 77:661–673

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mueller ME, Allgoewer M, Schneider R, Willenegger H (1992) Manual der Osteosynthese. AO-Technik. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mueller CA, Eingartner C, Schreitmueller E et al (2005) Primary stability of various forms of osteosynthesis in the treatment of the proximal tibia. J Bone Joint Surg (Br.) 87:426–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ricci WH, O`Boyle M, Borrelli J, Bellabarbara C, Sanders R (2001) Fractures of the proximal third of the tibial shaft treated with intramedullary nails and blocking screws. J Orthop Trauma 15:264–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rommens PM (1992) The significance of soft tissue trauma for fracture healing: a prospective study of 70 tibial shaft fractures. Acta Chir Belg 92:10–18

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schandelmeier P, Krettek C, Rudolf J, Kohl A, Katz BE, Tscherne H (1997) Superior results of tibial rodding versus external fixation in grade 3B fractures. Clin Orthop 342:164–172

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from any commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Hansen.

Additional information

The implants were delivered by STRATEC Medical (Oberdorf, Switzerland). The Proximal Tibial Nail (PTN) used in this investigation is not FDA approved.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansen, M., Blum, J., Mehler, D. et al. Double or triple interlocking when nailing proximal tibial fractures? A biomechanical investigation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 1715–1719 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0954-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0954-1

Keywords

Navigation