Abstract
Introduction
Circumcision is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in male children. A range of surgical techniques exist for this commonly performed procedure. The aim of this study is to assess the safety, functional outcome and cosmetic appearance of a sutureless circumcision technique.
Methods
Over a 9-year period, 502 consecutive primary sutureless circumcisions were performed by a single surgeon. All 502 cases were entered prospectively into a database including all relevant clinical details and a review was performed. The technique used to perform the sutureless circumcision is a modification of the standard sleeve technique with the use of a bipolar diathermy and the application of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (2-OCA) to approximate the tissue edges.
Results
All boys in this study were pre-pubescent and the ages ranged from 6 months to 12 years (mean age 3.5 years). All patients had this procedure performed as a day case and under general anaesthetic. Complications included: haemorrhage (2.2%), haematoma (1.4%), wound infection (4%), allergic reaction (0.2%) and wound dehiscence (0.8%). Only 9 (1.8%) parents or patients were dissatisfied with the cosmetic appearance.
Conclusion
The use of 2-OCA as a tissue adhesive for sutureless circumcisions is an alternative to the standard suture technique. The use of this tissue adhesive, 2-OCA, results in comparable complication rates to the standard circumcision technique and results in excellent post-operative cosmetic satisfaction.
References
Williams N, Kapila L (1993) Complications of circumcision. Br J Surg 80(10):1231–1236
O’Sullivan DC, Heal MR, Powell CS (1996) Circumcision: how do urologists do it? Br J Urol 78(2):265–270
Zafar F et al (1993) Sutureless circumcision. Br J Surg 80(7):859
Elmasalme FN, Matbouli SA, Zuberi MS (1995) Use of tissue adhesive in the closure of small incisions and lacerations. J Pediatr Surg 30(6):837–838
Toriumi DM, Bagal AA (2002) Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives for skin closure in the outpatient setting. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 35(1):103–118 (vi–vii)
Cheng W, Saing H (1997) A prospective randomized study of wound approximation with tissue glue in circumcision in children. J Paediatr Child Health 33(6):515–516
Toriumi DM et al (1998) Use of octyl-2-cyanoacrylate for skin closure in facial plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(6):2209–2219
Maw JL et al (1997) A prospective comparison of octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and suture for the closure of head and neck incisions. J Otolaryngol 26(1):26–30
Bruns TB, Worthington JM (2000) Using tissue adhesive for wound repair: a practical guide to dermabond. Am Fam Physician 61(5):1383–1388
Quinn JV et al (1995) N-2-butylcyanoacrylate: risk of bacterial contamination with an appraisal of its antimicrobial effects. J Emerg Med 13(4):581–585
Griffiths DM, Atwell JD, Freeman NV (1985) A prospective survey of the indications and morbidity of circumcision in children. Eur Urol 11(3):184–187
Arunachalam P, King PA, Orford J (2003) A prospective comparison of tissue glue versus sutures for circumcision. Pediatr Surg Int 19(1–2):18–19
El-Dars LD et al (2010) Allergic contact dermatitis to Dermabond after orthopaedic joint replacement. Contact Dermat 62(5):315–317
D’Arcy FT, Jaffry SQ (2011) A review of 100 consecutive sutureless child and adult circumcisions. Ir J Med Sci 180(1):51–53
Fraser ID, Goede AC (2002) Sutureless circumcision. BJU Int 90(4):467–468
Subramaniam R, Jacobsen AS (2004) Sutureless circumcision: a prospective randomised controlled study. Pediatr Surg Int 20(10):783–785
Elmore JM, Smith EA, Kirsch AJ (2007) Sutureless circumcision using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond): appraisal after 18-month experience. Urology 70(4):803–806
Kaye JD et al (2010) Sutureless and scalpel-free circumcision–more rapid, less expensive and better? J Urol 184(4 Suppl):1758–1762
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kelly, B.D., Lundon, D.J., Timlin, M.E. et al. Paediatric sutureless circumcision—an alternative to the standard technique. Pediatr Surg Int 28, 305–308 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-3015-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-3015-0