Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Topology optimization of truss subjected to static and dynamic constraints by integrating simulated annealing into passing vehicle search algorithms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three modified versions of passing vehicle search (PVS) are proposed and tested on truss topology optimization with static and dynamic constraints. PVS works on the mechanism of passing a vehicle on a two-lane highway. The heuristic nature of PVS allows the search to jump into non-visited regions (exploration) and also permits a local search of visited regions (exploitation). First, the original PVS algorithm is improved to avoid a local optima trap using a novel parallel run mechanism. Then, population diversity is improved by incorporating the selection of simulated annealing. The various versions of PVS are verified on the truss design problems. Comparative results show that the parallel run concept improves the original PVS algorithm. The selection using the Boltzmann probability as used in simulated annealing further improves the algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahrari A, Atai AA, Deb K (2015) Simultaneous topology, shape and size optimization of truss structures by fully stressed design based on evolution strategy. Eng Optim 47:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2014.947972

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng MY, Prayogo D (2017) A novel fuzzy adaptive teaching-learning-based optimization (FATLBO) for solving structural optimization problems. Eng Comput 33:55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-016-0456-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deb K, Gulati S (2001) Design of truss-structures for minimum weight using genetic algorithms. Finite Elem Anal Des 37:447–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(00)00057-3

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gandomi AH, Yang XS, Alavi AH (2013) Cuckoo search algorithm: a metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems. Eng Comput 29:17–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-011-0241-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ponterosso P, Fox DSJ (1999) Heuristically seeded genetic algorithms applied to truss optimisation. Eng Comput 15:345–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003660050029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ringertz ULFT. (1986) A branch and bound algorithm for topology optimization of truss structures. Eng Optim 10:111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/03052158608902532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tejani GG, Savsani VJ, Bureerat S, Patel VK (2018) Topology and size optimization of trusses with static and dynamic bounds by modified symbiotic organisms search. J Comput Civ Eng 32:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tejani GG, Savsani VJ, Patel VK, Mirjalili S (2018) An improved heat transfer search algorithm for unconstrained optimization problems. J Comput Des Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2018.04.003

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2013) Topology optimization of trusses considering static and dynamic constraints using the CSS. Appl Soft Comput J 13:2727–2734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jin P, De-yu W (2006) Topology optimization of truss structure with fundamental frequency and frequency domain dynamic response constraints. Acta Mech Solida Sin 19:231–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-006-0628-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Noilublao N, Bureerat S (2011) Simultaneous topology, shape and sizing optimisation of a three-dimensional slender truss tower using multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. Comput Struct 89:2531–2538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Savsani VJ, Tejani GG, Patel VK (2016) Truss topology optimization with static and dynamic constraints using modified subpopulation teaching–learning-based optimization. Eng Optim 48:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2016.1150468

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu B, Jiang J, Tong W, Wu K (2003) Topology group concept for truss topology optimization with frequency constraints. J Sound Vib 261:911–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01021-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2014) Democratic PSO for truss layout and size optimization with frequency constraints. Comput Struct 130:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tejani GG, Savsani VJ, Patel VK (2016) Adaptive symbiotic organisms search (SOS) algorithm for structural design optimization. J Comput Des Eng 3:226–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2016.02.003

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tejani GG, Savsani VJ, Patel VK (2016) Modified sub-population teaching-learning-based optimization for design of truss structures with natural frequency constraints. Mech Based Des Struct Mach 44:495–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2015.1124023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakamura T, Ohsaki M (1992) A natural generator of optimum topology of plane trusses for specified fundamental-frequency. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94:113–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(92)90159-h

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Achtziger W (1999) Local stability of trusses in the context of topology optimization. Part I: exact modelling. Struct Optim 17:235–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001580050056

    Google Scholar 

  19. Achtziger W (1999) Local stability of trusses in the context of topology optimization part II: a numerical approach. Struct Optim 17:247–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001580050056

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rozvany GIN (1996) Difficulties in truss topology optimization with stress and local buckling constraints. Struct Optim 11:134–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stolpe M, Svanberg K (2003) A note on stress-constrained truss topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 25:62–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-002-0273-4

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou M (1996) Difficulties in truss topology optimization with stress and local buckling constraints. Struct Optim 11:134–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Savsani P, Savsani V (2016) Passing vehicle search (PVS): a novel metaheuristic algorithm. Appl Math Model 40:3951–3978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.10.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Savsani VJ, Tejani GG, Patel VK, Savsani P (2017) Modified meta-heuristics using random mutation for truss topology optimization with static and dynamic constraints. J Comput Des Eng 4:106–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2016.1150468

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tejani GG, Savsani VJ, Patel VK, Savsani PV (2018) Size, shape, and topology optimization of planar and space trusses using mutation-based improved metaheuristics. J Comput Des Eng 5:198–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2017.10.001

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kirsch U (1989) Optimal topologies of truss structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 72:15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(89)90119-9 doi

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Ho-Huu V, Nguyen-Thoi T, Nguyen-Thoi MH, Le-Anh L (2015) An improved constrained differential evolution using discrete variables (D-ICDE) for layout optimization of truss structures. Expert Syst Appl 42:7057–7069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Farshchin M, Camp CV, Maniat M (2017) Optimal design of truss structures for size and shape with frequency constraints using a collaborative optimization strategy. Expert Syst Appl 66:203–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gomes HM (2011) Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using a particle swarm algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 38:957–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li L, Liu F (2011) Group search optimization for applications in structural design, adaptation, learning, and optimization. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20536-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Pholdee N, Bureerat S (2014) Comparative performance of meta-heuristic algorithms for mass minimisation of trusses with dynamic constraints. Adv Eng Softw 75:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaveh A, Mahdavi VR (2015) Two-dimensional colliding bodies algorithm for optimal design of truss structures. Adv Eng Softw 83:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ohsaki M, Fujisawa K, Katoh N, Kanno Y (1999) Semi-definite programming for topology optimization of trusses under multiple eigenvalue constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 180:203–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00056-0

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Miguel LFF, Lopez RH, Miguel LFF (2013) Multimodal size, shape, and topology optimisation of truss structures using the Firefly algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 56:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaveh A, Ahmadi B (2014) Sizing, geometry and topology optimization of trusses using force method and supervised charged system search. Struct Eng Mech 50:365–382. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.50.3.365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaveh A, Hassani B, Shojaee S, Tavakkoli SM (2008) Structural topology optimization using ant colony methodology. Eng Struct 30:2559–2565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2014) Comparison of nine meta-heuristic algorithms for optimal design of truss structures with frequency constraints. Adv Eng Softw 76:9–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, RK University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India

    Ghanshyam G. Tejani

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University, Raysan, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

    Vimal J. Savsani & Vivek K. Patel

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

    Sujin Bureerat

  4. Department of Industrial Engineering, Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University, Raysan, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

    Poonam Savsani

Authors
  1. Ghanshyam G. Tejani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vimal J. Savsani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sujin Bureerat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vivek K. Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Poonam Savsani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghanshyam G. Tejani.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: The PVS and PVS-SA algorithms’ formulation

figure b

Appendix B: The PPVS and PPVS-SA algorithms’ formulation

figure c

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tejani, G.G., Savsani, V.J., Bureerat, S. et al. Topology optimization of truss subjected to static and dynamic constraints by integrating simulated annealing into passing vehicle search algorithms. Engineering with Computers 35, 499–517 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0612-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0612-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation