Abstract
Calling song of the cricket Gryllus assimilis is unusual among Gryllus spp. in the high sound-pulse rate, ca. 80 Hz, within its chirps. We asked whether, as in other cricket species, females were able to analyze such a high pulse rate. In phonotaxis experiments, females failed to respond to stimuli with pulse rates substantially higher or lower than the species-typical value, demonstrating that they are indeed selective for this parameter. We also examined how pulse rate was represented by modulation in firing rate of the neuron AN1, the main carrier of information about cricket-song-like stimuli to the brain. For attractive stimuli, i.e. with high pulse rates, modulation of AN1 firing rate through time was surprisingly modest. This suggests that the brain circuits that analyze AN1 spike trains might be more sensitive to slight variations in AN1 firing rate than their counterparts in more slowly singing species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beckers OM, Wagner W (2012) Divergent preferences for song structure between a field cricket and its phonotactic parasitoid. J Insect Behav 5:467–477
Burk T (1982) Evolutionary significance of predation on sexually signalling males. Fla Entomol 65:90–104
Deily JA, Schul J (2004) Recognition of calls with exceptionally fast pulse rates: female phonotaxis in the genus Neoconocephalus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J Exp Biol 207:3523–3529
Doherty JA (1985) Trade-off phenomena in calling song recognition and phonotaxis in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol A 156:787–800
Doolan JM, Pollack GS (1985) Phonotactic specificity of the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: intensity-dependent selectivity for temporal properties of the stimulus. J Comp Physiol A 157:113–131
Franz A, Ronacher B (2002) Temperature dependence of temporal resolution in an insect nervous system. J Comp Physiol A 188:261–271
Goldberg JM, Brown PB (1969) Functional organization of the dog superior olivary nucleus: an anatomical and electrophysiological study. J Neurophysiol 31:639–656
Gray DA, Cade WH (2000) Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:14449–14454
Greenfield MD (1990) Evolution of acoustic communication in the genus Neoconocephalus: discontinuous songs, synchrony, and interspecific interactions. In: Bailey WJ, Rentz DCF (eds) The Tettigoniidae: biology, systematics and evolution. Springer, Berlin, pp 71–97
Grobe B, Rothbart MM, Hanschke A, Hennig RM (2012) Auditory processing at two time scales by the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Exp Biol 215:1681–1690
Hennig RM (1988) Ascending auditory interneurons in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus (Walker): comparative physiology and direct connections with afferents. J Comp Physiol A 163:135–143
Hennig RM (2003) Acoustic feature extraction by cross-correlation in crickets? J Comp Physiol A 189:589–598
Hennig RM (2009) Walking in Fourier’s space: algorithms for the computation of periodicities in song patterns by the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Comp Physiol A 195:971–981
Hennig RM, Weber T (1997) Filtering of temporal parameters of the calling song by females of two closely relate species: a behavioral analysis. J Comp Physiol A 180:621–630
Judge KA (2011) Do male field crickets, Gryllus pennsylvanicus, signal their age? Anim Behav 81:185–194
Kostarakos K, Hedwig B (2012) Calling song recognition in female crickets: temporal tuning of identified brain neurons matches behavior. J Neurosci 32:9601–9612
Lehmann GUC (2003) Review of biogeography, host range and evolution of acoustic hunting in Ormiini (Insecta, Diptera, Tachinidae), parasitoids of night-calling bushcrickets and crickets (Insecta, Orthoptera, Ensifera). Zool. Anzeiger 242:107–120
Marsat G, Pollack GS (2004) Differential temporal coding of rhythmically diverse acoustic signals by a single interneuron. J Neurophysiol 92:939–948
Marsat G, Pollack GS (2005) Effect of the temporal pattern of contralateral inhibition on sound localization cues. J Neurosci 25:6137–6144
Mitra C, Wagner WE, Zera AJ, Tolle AE (2011) Variation in singing behaviour among morphs of the sand field cricket, Gryllus firmus. Ecol Entomol 36:152–160
Nabatiyan A, Poulet JFA, de Polavieja GG, Hedwig B (2003) Temporal pattern recognition based on instantaneous spike rate coding in a simple auditory system. J Neurophysiol 90:2484–2493
Pollack GS, Hoy RR (1979) Temporal pattern as a cue for species-specific calling song recognition in crickets. Science 204:429–432
Poulet JFA, Hedwig B (2005) Orientation in crickets: pattern recognition controls reactive steering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:15665–15669
Römer H (1998) The sensory ecology of acoustic communication in insects. In: Hoy RR, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative hearing: insects. Springer handbook of auditory research. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–96
Ronacher B, Römer H (1985) Spike synchronization of tympanic receptor fibres in a grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus L., (Acrididae). A possible mechanism for detection of short gaps in model songs. J Comp Physiol A 157:631–642
Rothbart MM, Hennig RM (2012) Calling song signals and temporal preference functions in the cricket Teleogryllus leo. J Comp Physiol A 198:817–825
Sabourin P, Pollack GS (2010) Temporal coding by populations of auditory receptors. J Neurophysiol 103:1614–1621
Sabourin P, Gottlieb H, Pollack GS (2008) Carrier-dependent temporal processing in an auditory interneuron. J Acoust Soc Amer 123:2910–2917
Schildberger K (1984) Temporal selectivity of identified auditory neurons in the cricket brain. J Comp Physiol A 155:171–185
Schneider E, Hennig RM (2012) Temporal resolution for calling song signals by female crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Comp Physiol A 198:181–191
Schul J (1998) Song recognition by temporal cues in a group of closely related bushcricket species (genus Tettigonia). J Comp Physiol A 183:401–410
Souroukis K, Cade WE, Rowell G (1992) Factors that possibly influence variation in the calling song of field crickets: temperature, time, and male size, age, and wing morphology. Can J Zool 70:950–955
Surlykke A, Larsen ON, Michelsen A (1988) Temporal coding in the auditory receptor of the moth ear. J Comp Physiol A 162:367–374
Thorson J, Weber T, Huber F (1982) Auditory behaviour of the cricket. II Simplicity of calling-song recognition in Gryllus, and anomalous phonotaxis at abnormal carrier frequencies. J Comp Physiol A 146:361–378
Triblehorn JD, Schul J (2009) Sensory-encoding differences contribute to species-specific call recognition mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 102:1348–1357
Tunstall DN, Pollack GS (2005) Temporal and directional processing by an identified interneuron, ON1, compared in cricket species that sing with different tempos. J Comp Physiol A 191:363–372
Vedenina VU, Pollack GS (2012) Recognition of variable courtship song in the field cricket Gryllus assimilis. J Exp Biol 215:2210–2219
von Helversen D, von Helversen O (1997) Recognition of sex in the acoustic communication of the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). J Comp Physiol A 180:373–386
Weissman DB, Walker TJ, Gray DAB (2009) The field cricket Gryllus assimilis and two new sister species (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Ann Entomol Soc Amer 102:367–380
Wohlers DW, Huber F (1982) Processing of sound signals by six types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket Gryllus campestris. J Comp Physiol A 146:161–174
Zuk M, Simmons LM, Cupp L (1993) Calling characteristics of parasitized and unparasitized populations of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:339–343
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a Discovery Grant to GSP from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank A. Zera for providing cricket eggs, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. These experiments conformed to all guidelines for animal experimentation set by the Canadian Council on Animal Care and by McGill University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pollack, G.S., Kim, J.S. Selective phonotaxis to high sound-pulse rate in the cricket Gryllus assimilis . J Comp Physiol A 199, 285–293 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-013-0792-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-013-0792-z