Skip to main content
Log in

Coronary CT angiography: automatic cardiac-phase selection for image reconstruction

  • Cardiac
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated an algorithm for automatic selection of the cardiac phase with the least motion for image reconstruction at coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography (CCTA). We analyzed data of 100 patients (49 female, mean age 59 years) who had undergone retrospectively ECG-gated CCTA. Two experienced observers visually identified the most suitable end-systolic and end-diastolic phases using a series of image reconstructions in 5% increments across the RR cycle. The same data were then reconstructed using an automatic phase finding algorithm based on a 4D weighting function of cardiac motion. On average, the algorithm determined the most suitable systolic reconstruction phase at 40.11 ± 6.29% RR compared with 40.07 ± 5.58% RR by the human observers (p = NS). The most suitable diastolic phase was found at 72.71 ± 7.37% RR by the automatic algorithm, compared with 76.43 ± 6.35% RR by the observers (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between automatically and visually determined reconstruction phases regarding motion and stair-step artifacts in either systole or diastole (p > 0.05). Thus, there appears to be no relevant difference between an automatic phase finding algorithm and visual selection by experienced observers for determining the phase with the least cardiac motion for CCTA image reconstruction. The use of automatic phase finding may therefore facilitate the performance of cardiac CT and reduce human error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2007) Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing. Invest Radiol 42:543–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2008) Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 29:766–776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Holle J, Muschiol G, Daniel WG, Moshage W (2000) In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT. Radiol 216:457–463

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Seifarth H, Wienbeck S, Pusken M et al (2007) Optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for coronary CT angiography using dual-source CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1317–1323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lu B, Mao SS, Zhuang N et al (2001) Coronary artery motion during the cardiac cycle and optimal ECG triggering for coronary artery imaging. Invest Radiol 36:250–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kroft LJ, de Roos A, Geleijns J (2007) Artifacts in ECG-synchronized MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:581–591

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y, Vidan E, Bergman GW (1999) Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest period and implications for coronary MR angiography. Radiol 213:751–758

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Joseph Schoepf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruzsics, B., Gebregziabher, M., Lee, H. et al. Coronary CT angiography: automatic cardiac-phase selection for image reconstruction. Eur Radiol 19, 1906–1913 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1368-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1368-8

Keywords

Navigation