Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between RAPD and SSR molecular markers in detecting genetic variation in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa A. Chev)

  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two different DNA-based techniques, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers, were used for fingerprinting kiwifruit genotypes and for detecting undesirable genetic variation in micropropagated plants. The fragments were scored as present (1) or absent (0), and those readings were entered in a computer file as a binary matrix (one for each marker). Two cluster analyses were performed to express – in the form of dendrograms – the relationships among the genotypes and the genetic variability detected. Both DNA-based techniques were able to amplify all of the genotypes, but only SSR markers could detect genetic variation induced in micropropagated plants of cv. Tomuri. Two hypotheses were formulated to explain these results, both of them are in agreement with the results obtained using these two types of molecular markers. We conclude that when the tissue culture technique is used, the analysis of somaclonal variability could require more than one DNA-based technique; in fact, the genetic variation present in different sources could interfere or combine with the more or less polymorphic ability, as our results showed for SSR and RAPD markers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palombi, M., Damiano, C. Comparison between RAPD and SSR molecular markers in detecting genetic variation in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa A. Chev). Plant Cell Rep 20, 1061–1066 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-001-0430-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-001-0430-z

Navigation