Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrated Approach for Prioritizing Watersheds for Management: A Study of Lidder Catchment of Kashmir Himalayas

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 04 December 2014

Abstract

The Himalayan watersheds are susceptible to various forms of degradation due to their sensitive and fragile ecological disposition coupled with increasing anthropogenic disturbances. Owing to the paucity of appropriate technology and financial resources, the prioritization of watersheds has become an inevitable process for effective planning and management of natural resources. Lidder catchment constitutes a segment of the western Himalayas with an area of 1,159.38 km2. The study is based on integrated analysis of remote sensing, geographic information system, field study, and socioeconomic data. Multicriteria evaluation of geophysical, land-use and land-cover (LULC) change, and socioeconomic indicators is carried out to prioritize watersheds for natural resource conservation and management. Knowledge-based weights and ranks are normalized, and weighted linear combination technique is adopted to determine final priority value. The watersheds are classified into four priority zones (very high priority, high priority, medium priority, and low priority) on the basis of quartiles of the priority value, thus indicating their ecological status in terms of degradation caused by anthropogenic disturbances. The correlation between priority ranks of individual indicators and integrated indicators is drawn. The results reveal that socioeconomic indicators are the most important drivers of LULC change and environmental degradation in the catchment. Moreover, the magnitude and intensity of anthropogenic impact is not uniform in different watersheds of Lidder catchment. Therefore, any conservation and management strategy must be formulated on the basis of watershed prioritization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAher PD, Adinarayana J, Gorantiwar SD (2013) Prioritization of watersheds using multi-criteria evaluation through fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Agric Eng Int CIGR J 15(1):11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Akber MA, Shrestha RP (2013) Land use change and its effect on biodiversity in Chiang Rai province of Thailand. J Land Use Sci 1–21

  • Ali S, Singh R (2002) Morphological and hydrological investigation in Hirakud catchment for watershed management planning. J Soil Water Conserv 1(4):246–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Badar B, Romshoo SA, Khan MA (2013) Integrating biophysical and socioeconomic information for prioritizing watersheds in a Kashmir Himalayan lake: A remote sensing and GIS approach. Environ Monit Assess 185(8):6419–6445

  • Bhat MS, Malik MI, Kuchay NA (2007) Impact of tourism on land use/land cover—A case study of Lidder watershed of Kashmir valley. In: Rawat MSS (ed) Management strategies for the Indian Himalaya: development and conservation. Media House, Srinagar Garhwal, pp 61–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt BP, Sachan MS (2004) Firewood consumption pattern of different tribal communities in northeast India. Energy Policy 32(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boles SH, Xiao X, Liu J, Zhang et al (2004) Land cover characterization of temperate east Asia using multi-temporal vegetation sensor data. Remote Sens Environ 90(4):477–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonetemps S, Bogoert P, Titeux N, Defouring P (2008) An object-based change detection method accounting for temporal dependences in the series with medium to coarse spatial resolution. Remote Sens Environ 112(6):3181–3191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calizaya A, Meixner O, Bengtsson L, Berndtsson R (2010) Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for integrated water resources management (IWRM) in the lake Poopo Basin, Bolivia. Water Resour Manag 24(10):2267–2289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary RS, Sharma PD (1998) Erosion hazard assessment and treatment prioritization of Giri River catchment, North Western Himalayas. Indian J Soil Conserv 26(1):6–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdary VM, Chakraborthy D, Jeyaram A, Krishna Murthy YVN, Sharma JR, Dadhwal VK (2013) Multi-criteria decision making approach for watershed prioritization using analytic hierarchy process technique and GIS. Water Resour Manag 27:3555–3571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung ES, Lee KS (2009) Prioritization of water management for sustainability using hydrologic simulation model and multi-criteria decision making techniques. J Environ Manag 90:1502–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig EH, Karen AK (1995) To normalize or not to normalize? Fat is the question. Environ Toxicol Chem 14(5):801–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TE (2003) The watershed project management guide. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBarry PA (2004) Watersheds: processes, assessment and management. Wiley, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries RS, Rudel T, Uriarte M, Hansen M (2010) Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat Geosci 3:178–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duda AM, Johnson RJ (1985) Cost-effective targeting of agricultural nonpoint-source pollution controls. J Soil Water Conserv 40(1):108–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson DL (1995) Rural land use and land cover change in land use policy. Land Use Policy 12(3):223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer G, O’Neill BC (2005) Global and case-based modeling of population and land use change. In: Barbara E, Stern PC (eds) Population, land use and environment: research directions. National Research Council Press, Washington, DC, pp 53–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Gregory PA et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foody GM, Cutler MEJ (2006) Mapping the species richness and composition of tropical forests from remotely sensed data with neural networks. Ecol Model 195:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goicoechea A, Stakhiv EZ, Li F (1992) Experimental evaluation of multiple criteria decision models for application to water resources planning. Water Resour Bull 28:89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosain AK, Rao S (2004) GIS-based technologies for watershed management. Curr Sci 87:948–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen H, Brooks KN, Ffolliott PF, Henzell T, Kassam A, Tejawani KG (1996) Watershed management as a unifying framework for researching land and water conservation issues. Land Husb 1(2):23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlaing K, Haruyama S, Maung A (2008) Using GIS-based distributed soil loss modeling and morphometric analysis to prioritize watershed for soil conservation in Bago river basin of Lower Myanmar. Front Earth Sci China 2(4):465–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang PC (2005) Audit of solid wastes from hotels and composting trial in HaLong City, Vietnam. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

  • Hodgson ME, Jensen JR, Tullis JA, Riordan KD, Archer CM (2003) Synergistic use of lidar and color aerial photography for mapping urban parcel imperviousness. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69:973–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honore G (1999) Our land, ourselves—A guide to watershed management in India. Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Trans Am Geophys Union 13:350–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives JD, Messerli B (1989) The Himalayan dilemma: Reconciling development and conservation. Rutledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal RK, Thomas T, Galkate RV, Ghosh NC, Singh S (2014) Watershed prioritization using Saaty’s AHP based decision support for soil conservation measures. Water Resour Manag 28:475–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen LF, Jaarsma J, Linder E (1990) Integrating topographic data with remote sensing for land cover classification. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 48(1):123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Javed A, Khanday MY, Ahmed R (2011) Watershed prioritization using morphometric and land use/land cover parameters: a remote sensing and GIS-based approach. J Geol Soc India 78(1):63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jodha NS (1990) Rural common property resources: contributions and crisis. Econ Polit Wkly 25(26):65–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GB, Zuleta GA (2013) Land use land cover change and ecosystem loss in the Espinal eco-region, Argentina. Agric Ecosyst Environ 181:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AR, Settle JJ, Wyatt BK (1988) Use of digital terrain data in the interpretation of Spot-1 HRV multispectral imagery. Int J Remote Sens 9(4):669–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalin L, Hantush M (2009) An auxiliary method to decrease potential adverse impacts of projected land developments: sub-watershed prioritization. Environ Manag 43(2):311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanth TA, Hassan Z (2012) Morphometric analysis and prioritization of watersheds for soil and water resource management in Wular catchment using geo-spatial tools. Int J Geol Earth Environ Sci 2(1):30–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasereka K, Yansheng G, Mbue IN, Samake M (2010) Remote sensing and geographic information system for inferring land cover and land use change in Wuhan (China), 1987–2006. J Sus Dev 3(2):221–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Katiyar R, Garg PK, Jain SK (2006) Watershed prioritization and reservoir sedimentation using remote sensing data. Geocarto Int 21(3):55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle T, Radeloff VC, Perzanowski K, Hostert P (2006) Cross border comparison of land cover and landscape pattern in Eastern Europe using a hybrid classification technique. Remote Sens Environ 103:449–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar B, Kumar U (2011) Micro-watershed characterization and prioritization using geomatics technology for natural resources management. Int J Geomat Geosci 1(4):789–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin EF, Serneels S, Wesemael BV (2001) Our emerging understanding of the causes of land use and cover change. Glob Environ Change 11:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW (2008) Remote sensing and image interpretation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Yaning C (2006) Impact of population growth and land use change on water resources and ecosystems of the arid Tarim River basin in western China. Int J Sus Dev World Ecol 13(4):295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Londhe S, Nathawat MS, Subudhi AP (2010) Erosion susceptibility zoning and prioritization of mini watersheds using geomatics approach. Int J Geomat Geosci 1(3):511–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Xu J, Noordwijk MV (2010) Sensitivity of stream flow from a Himalayan catchment to plausible changes in land cover and climate. Hydrol Process 24:1379–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas RP, Smolen MD, Dressing SA (1985) Selecting critical area for nonpoint-source pollution control. J Soil Water Conserv 40(1):68–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Madan S, Rawat L (2000) The impacts of tourism on the environment of Mussoorie, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Environmentalist 20:249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitra MK (2001) Watershed management. Omega Scientific Publishers, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik MI (2012a) Spatio-temporal analysis of urban dynamics in Kashmir valley (1901-2011) using geographical information system. Int Multidisc Res J 2(8):21–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malik MI (2012b) Integrated watershed management for sustainable development of western Himalayas—a study of Lidder catchment. Doctoral thesis, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India

  • Malik MI, Bhat MS (2014) Anthropogenic land use change detection in a Kashmir Himalayan watershed—a remote sensing and GIS approach. J Remote Sens GIS 5(1):34–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik MI, Bhat MS, Kuchay NA (2011a) Watershed-based drainage morphometric analysis of Lidder catchment in Kashmir valley using geographical information system. Recent Res Sci Technol 3(4):118–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik MI, Bhat MS, Kuchay NA (2011b) Anthropogenic impact on forest cover in the western Himalayas—a case study of Lidder catchment in Kashmir valley. Transactions 33(1):55–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik MI, Bhat MS, Kuchay NA (2013) Watershed-based land use land cover change detection analysis for sustainable development of Lidder catchment in Kashmir Himalayas. In: Qureshi MH (ed) Jamia geographical studies, vol 2., Manak Publications Private LimitedNew Delhi, India, pp 295–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin D, Saha SK (2007) Integrated approach of using remote sensing and GIS to study watershed prioritization and productivity. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 35(1):21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather AS, Needle CL (2000) The relationship of population and forest trends. Geogr J 166(1):2–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra SS, Nagarajan R (2010) Morphometric analysis and prioritization of sub-watersheds using GIS and remote sensing techniques: a study of Odisha, India. Int J Geomat Geosci 1(3):501–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottet A, Ladet S, Coque N, Gibon A (2006) Agricultural land use change and its drivers in mountain landscapes: a case study in the Pyrenees. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114:296–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mountain (2002) Watershed management, beyond the international year of mountains. Mountain partnership, watershed theme

  • Munsi M, Malaviya S, Oinam G, Joshi PK (2009) A landscape approach for quantifying land use and land cover change (1976–2006) in middle Himalaya. Regional Environ Change 10(2):145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold SC, Siikamaki J (2009) Prioritizing conservation activities using reserve site selection methods and population viability analysis. Ecol Appl 19(7):1774–1790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niraula R, Kalin L, Wang R, Srivastava P (2011) Determining nutrient and sediment critical source areas with SWAT: effect of lumped calibration. Biol Eng Trans 55(1):137–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooka RK, Srivastava YK, Venkateswara RV, Amminedu E, Murthy KSR (2005) Check dam positioning by prioritization of micro-watersheds using SYI model and morphometric analysis—REMOTE sensing and GIS perspective. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33(1):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill KM (2005) Can watershed unite town and country? Soc Nat Resour 18(3):241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owrangi AM, Lannigan R, Simonovic SP (2014) Interaction between land-use change, flooding and human health in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Nat Hazards 72:1219–1230

  • Ozyuvaci N, Ozhan S, Gorceliodlu E (1997) Integrated watershed management for sustainable development of renewable natural resources. In: Paper presented at the XI World Forestry Congress, Antalya, Turkey

  • Pai N, Saraswat D, Daniels M (2011) Identifying priority sub-watersheds in the Illinois river drainage area in Arkansas watershed using a distributed modeling approach. Biol Eng Trans 54(6):2181–2196

    Google Scholar 

  • Panhalkar SS, Mali SP, Pawar CT (2012) Morphometric analysis and watershed development prioritization of Hiranykeshi basin in Maharashtra, India. Int J Environ Sci 3:525–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant BR (2003) Degrading environment and growing population of the Indian Himalaya. ENVIS Bull Himal Ecol 11(1):23–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil VSP, Mali SP (2013) Watershed characterization and prioritization of Tulasi sub-watershed: a geospatial approach. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 2(6):1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paul JM, Inayathulla M (2012) Morphometric analysis and prioritization of Hebbal valley in Bangalore. J Mech Civil Engr 2(6):31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polunin O, Stainton A (1984) Flowers of the Himalaya. Oxford University Press, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzel B (2004) Remote sensing-based quantification of land cover and land use change for planning. Prog Plann 61:281–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj AP, Kumar ND (1998) Ranking multi-criterion river basin planning alternatives using fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 100:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju KV, Aziz A, Sundaram M, Sekher M, Wani SP, Sreedevi TK (2008) Guidelines for planning and implementation of watershed development program in India: a review. Global theme on agro-ecosystems, report no. 48. Research report. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics, Andhra Pradesh, India

  • Rashid I, Romshoo SA (2012) Impact of anthropogenic activities on water quality of Lidder River in Kashmir Himalayas. Environ Monit Assess 185(6):4705–4719

  • Reddy OGP, Maji AK, Chary GR, Srinivas CV, Tiwary P, Gajbhiye SK (2004) GIS and remote sensing applications in prioritization of river sub-basins using morphometric and USLE parameters: a case study. Asian J Geoinform 4(4):35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid LM (2010) Understanding and evaluating cumulative watershed impacts. In: Elliot WJ, Miller IS, Audin L (eds) Cumulative watershed effects of fuel management in the western United States. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-231, pp 277–298

  • Rhoades (2000) The participatory multi-purpose watershed project. In: Lal R (ed) Integrated watershed management in the global ecosystem. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 327–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1988) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma S, Saikia T (2012) Prioritization of sub-watersheds in Khanapara-Bornihat area of Assam-Meghalaya (India) based on land use and slope analysis using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 40(3):435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma RK, Sarma RT (2014) Conservation prioritization using multi-criteria decision model: a case study in part of western Himalayan eco-region. J Remote Sens GIS 5(1):16–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen SK, Partap T, Sharma PN (1997) Farmer-led trainer’s resource book: Participatory watershed management training in Asia Program. Kathmandu, Nepal. Netherlands UNDP/FAO, GCP/RAS/161/Net-RAS/93/062, p 11

  • Shalaby A, Tateishi R (2007) Remote sensing and GIS for mapping and monitoring land cover and land use changes in the northwestern coastal zone of Egypt. Appl Geogr 27:28–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shikalgar RS (2013) Morphometric analysis and prioritization of watershed for soil resource management in Yerala river basin. Indian Streams Res J 3(6):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinde V, Sharma A, Tiwari KN, Singh M (2011) Quantitative determination of soil erosion and prioritization of micro-watersheds using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 39(2):181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrimali SS, Aggarwal SP, Samra JS (2001) Prioritization erosion-prone areas in hills using remote sensing and GIS—a case study of the Sukhna lake catchment, northern India. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform 3(1):54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh JS (2006) Sustainable development of the Indian Himalayan region: linking ecological and economic concerns. Curr Sci 90(6):25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RK, Lama TD, Satapathy KK (2006) Treatment technologies for watershed development and management in north east hill region. ENVIS Bull Himal Ecol 14(1):14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas CV, Maji AK, Obi Reddy GP, Chary GR (2002) Assessment of soil erosion using remote sensing and GIS in Nagpur district Maharashtra for prioritization and delineation of conservation units. J lndian Soc Remote Sens 30(4):198–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone PB (1992) State of the world’s mountains—a global report. Mountain Agenda, p 391

  • Suresh M, Sudhakar S, Tiwari KN, Chowdary VM (2004) Prioritization of watersheds using morphometric parameters and assessment of surface water potential using remote sensing. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 32(3):249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trail M, Tsimpidi AP, Liu P, Tsigaridis K, Hu Y, Nenes A et al (2013) Potential impact of land use change on future regional climate in the Southeastern U.S.: reforestation and crop land conversion. J Geophys Res 118:11577–11588

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner-II BL, Meyer WB, Skok LD (1994) Global land use land cover change: towards an integrated study. Ambio 23(1):91–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM (1992) Global environmental change: an introduction. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 23:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittala SS, Govindaiah S, Gowda HH (2008) Prioritization of sub-watersheds for sustainable development and management of natural resources: an integrated approach using remote sensing, GIS and socio-economic data. Curr Sci 95(3):345–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang XL (2000) The analysis of population factors in land use land cover change. J Resour Sci Beijing 22(3):39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Wani SP, Singh HP, Sreedevi TK, Pathak P, Rego TJ, Shiferaw B et al (2003) Farmer participatory integrated watershed management: Adarsha watershed, Kothapally India: an innovative and up-scalable approach. In: Harwood RR, Kassam AH (eds) Research towards integrated natural resources management: Examples of research problems, approaches and partnerships in action in the CGIAR. Interim Science Council, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Rome, pp 123–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick NJ, Archibald AT, Ashworth K et al (2013) A study of the impact of land use change in Borneo on atmospheric composition using a global model. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 13:7431–7461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham JD (2000) A geography of ecosystem vulnerability. Landsc Ecol 15:495–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • William ER, William BM, Turner-II BL (1994) Modeling land use and land cover as part of global environmental change. Clim Change 28:45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J (2008) The trend of land use and land cover change and its impacts on biodiversity in the Himalayas. In: Paper presented at International Mountain Biodiversity Conference on Biodiversity Conservation and Management for Enhanced Ecosystem Services: Responding to the Challenges of Global Change, Nepal

  • Yang JS, Chung ES, Kim SU, Kim TW (2012) Prioritization of water management under climate change and urbanization using multi-criteria decision making methods. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:801–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorrilla-Mirasa PI, Palomoa E, Gomez-Baggethunc B, Martin-Lopeza PL, Lomasc CM (2014) Effects of land use change on wetland ecosystem services: a case study in the Donana marshes (SW Spain). Landsc Urban Plan 122:160–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present work is a part of the research project entitled “Assessment of Anthropogenic Impact on the Land-Use Dynamics in Lidder Catchment of Kashmir Valley” funded by the Indian Council of Social Science Research. The authors are highly thankful to them for providing the financial assistance. Thanks are also due to the anonymous reviewers who extended their unconditional guidance throughout the review process to improve the quality of the present work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Imran Malik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malik, M.I., Bhat, M.S. Integrated Approach for Prioritizing Watersheds for Management: A Study of Lidder Catchment of Kashmir Himalayas. Environmental Management 54, 1267–1287 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0361-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0361-4

Keywords

Navigation