Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Suction Drains, Quilting Sutures, and Fibrin Sealant in the Prevention of Seroma Formation in Abdominoplasty: Which is the Best Strategy?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Seroma is the most common complication in abdominoplasty and abdominal ultrasound is one of the best noninvasive methods for diagnosing seroma formation. The aim of this study was to compare the use of suction drains, quilting sutures, and fibrin sealant in abdominoplasty to determine the best strategy to prevent seroma formation.

Methods

Forty-three female patients, aged 20–66 years, nonsmokers, with Nahas’ type III deformities, and body mass index (BMI) ranging from 18.0 to 24.9 kg/m2, underwent abdominoplasty between March and October 2008 in a public hospital setting. The patients were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups: DN group (n = 15), abdominoplasty with suction drains alone; QS group (n = 13), abdominoplasty with quilting suture between the subcutaneous tissue of the flap and musculoaponeurotic layer of the anterior abdominal wall; and FS group (n = 15), abdominoplasty with fibrin sealant. All patients underwent ultrasound examination on postoperative days 15 and 30 for detection of abdominal fluid collections.

Results

The groups were homogeneous for age and BMI. There was a significant reduction in seroma formation between postoperative days 15 and 30 in the three groups (DN group, P = 0.0003; QS group, P = 0.0011; and FS group, P = 0.0003). Seroma formation was significantly higher in the FS group (H = 6.04, P < 0.05) compared with the DN and QS groups on postoperative day 15.

Conclusion

Seroma formation was significantly lower in the DN and QS groups compared with the FS group on postoperative day 15.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrades P, Prado A, Danilla S et al (2007) Progressive tension sutures in the prevention of postabdominoplasty seroma: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:935–946

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Avelar J (1985) Fat suction versus abdominoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 9:265–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baroudi R, Ferreira CA (1998) Seroma: how to avoid it and how to treat it. Aesthet Surg J 18:439–441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaouat M, Levan P, Lalanne B, Buisson T, Nicolau P, Mimoun M (2000) Abdominal dermolipectomies: early postoperative complications and long-term unfavorable results. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1614–1618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cruz-Korchin N, Korchin L (2005) The use of fibrin sealant (Tisseel) in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:23–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grazer FM, Goldwyn RM (1977) Abdominoplasty assessed by survey with emphasis on complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:513–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hafezi F, Nouhi AH (2002) Abdominoplasty and seroma. Ann Plast Surg 48:109–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hay-Roe V (1991) Seroma after lipoplasty with abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:997–998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Matarasso A (1995) Liposuction as an adjunct to a full abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:829–836

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohammad JA, Warnke PH, Stavraky W (1998) Ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of fluid collection complications following abdominoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 41:498–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nahas FX (2001) A pragmatic way to treat abdominal deformities based on skin and subcutaneous excess. Aesthet Plast Surg 25:365–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nahas FX, Ferreira LM, Ghelfond C (2007) Does quilting suture prevent seroma in abdominoplasty? Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1060–1064

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pollock H, Pollock T (2000) Progressive tension sutures: a technique to reduce local complications in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2583–2586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rios JL, Pollock T, Adams WP Jr (2003) Progressive tension sutures to prevent seroma formation after latissimus dorsi harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1779–1783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rossetto LA, Garcia EB, Abla LF, Neto MS, Ferreira LM (2009) Quilting suture in the donor site of the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 62:240–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Siegel S, Castellan NJ Jr (2006) Estatística não paramétrica para ciências do comportamento, 2nd edn. Artmed, Porto Alegre

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stocchero IN (1993) Ultrasound and seromas. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Titley OG, Spyrou GE, Fatah MF (1997) Preventing seroma in the latissimus dorsi flap donor site. Br J Plast Surg 50:106–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Toman N, Buschmann A, Muehlberger T (2007) Fibrin sealant and seroma formation following abdominoplasty. Chirurg 78:531–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zecha PJ, Missotten FE (1999) Pseudocyst formation after abdominoplasty—extravasations of Morel-Lavallée. Br J Plast Surg 52:500–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zimman AO, Butto CD, Ahualli PE (2001) Frequency of seroma in abdominal lipectomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1449–1451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Napoleão de Barros 715, 4o. Andar, São Paulo, SP, 04024-002, Brazil

    Marcos Eduardo Bercial, Miguel Sabino Neto, Luis Antonio Rossetto & Lydia Masako Ferreira

  2. Plastic Surgery Unit, Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    José Augusto Calil

Authors
  1. Marcos Eduardo Bercial
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel Sabino Neto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José Augusto Calil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luis Antonio Rossetto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lydia Masako Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos Eduardo Bercial.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bercial, M.E., Sabino Neto, M., Calil, J.A. et al. Suction Drains, Quilting Sutures, and Fibrin Sealant in the Prevention of Seroma Formation in Abdominoplasty: Which is the Best Strategy?. Aesth Plast Surg 36, 370–373 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9807-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9807-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation