Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term results of conservative management of midshaft clavicle fracture

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of 91 patients (59 males, 32 females, mean age 41 years) with middle-shaft clavicle fracture were assessed at a mean of 8.7 years after injury. Based on Allman’s classification, fractures were placed in group Ia, Ib and Ic. The majority (66%) were allocated to groups Ib or Ic. Clinical evaluation was made using the Constant score and simple shoulder test. On post-injury radiographs, we measured the amount of overlapping of the fracture fragments (OV) both in centimetres and as percentage of the length of the clavicle and the mean distance between cranio-caudally displaced fragments (DS). The mean Constant scores were 87.1% and 85.6% in groups Ib and Ic, respectively. In patients with a Constant score ≥90%, the mean OV was 7.7% and the average DS was 1.59 cm. In those with a Constant score of 81–89% the average OV and DS were 12% and 1.6 cm, respectively, with the greatest OV being 12.9. In the nine patients whose Constant score was ≥80% the mean OV was 13.2 and the average DS was 1.7; however, the majority of patients had an OV > 15% and DS ≥ 2 cm. In these nine patients the mean Constant score was significantly lower than that in the group with a score of ≥90%. The simple shoulder test showed that 20% of patients were dissatisfied with the outcome; a low score was associated with a severe degree of OV or DS. Fracture nonunion occurred in five cases (5.5%). We conclude that there is a clear-cut indication for surgery in patients with OV ≥ 15% or DS ≥ 2.3 cm as well as in those with an OV ≥ 13% associated with a DS ≥ 2 cm. This holds particularly for young and middle-aged patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neer C (1984) Fractures of the clavicle. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Green DP (eds) Fractures in adults, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 700–713

    Google Scholar 

  2. Postacchini F, Gumina S et al (2002) Epidemiology of the clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(5):452–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eskola A, Vainionnpaa S, Myllynen P et al (1986) Outcome of clavicular fracture in 89 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 105:337–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rowe CR (1968) An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 58:29–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson CM (1998) Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 80:467–484

    Google Scholar 

  6. Neer CS 2nd (1960) Nonunion of the clavicle. JAMA 172:1006–1011

    Google Scholar 

  7. Andermarhr J, Jubel A et al (2006) Malunion of the clavicle causes significant glenoid malposition: a quantitative anatomic investigation. Surg Radiol Anat 28:447–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hill JM, Mcguire MH (1997) Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 79:537–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson CM, Charles M et al (2004) Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of the clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86-A:1359–1365

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chan KY, Jupiter JB, Leffert RD, Marti R (1999) Clavicle malunion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:287–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Allman FL Jr (1967) Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 49-A:774–784

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wick M, Muller EJ, Kollig E, Muhr G (2001) Midshaft fractures of the calvicle with a shortening of more than 2 cm predispose to nonunion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:207–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (2007) Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 89:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grassi FA, Tajana MS, D’angelo F (2001) Management of midclavicular fractures: comparison between non operative treatment and open intramedullary fixation in 80 patients. J Trauma 50(6):1096–1100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lazarides S, Zafiropoulos G, Tydfil M (2006) Conservative treatment of fractures at the middle third of the clavicle: the relevance of shortening and clinical outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15(2):191–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bosh U, Skutek M, Peters G, Tscherne H (1998) Extension osteotomy in malunited clavicular fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7:402–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Iannotti MR, Crosby LA, Stafford P, Grayson G, Goulet R (2002) Effect of plate location and selection on the stability of midshaft clavicle osteotomies: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(5):457–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Postacchini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Postacchini, R., Gumina, S., Farsetti, P. et al. Long-term results of conservative management of midshaft clavicle fracture. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 34, 731–736 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0850-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0850-x

Keywords

Navigation