Skip to main content
Log in

The International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES)—10-years experience

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ahnfelt L, Herberts P, Malchau H, Andersson GB (1990) Prognosis of total hip replacement. A Swedish multicenter study of 4,664 revisions. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 238:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bourne RB (1999) The planning and implementation of the Canadian Joint Replacement Registry. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 58:128–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Galante J (1985) The need for a standardized system for evaluating results of total hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67:511–512

    Google Scholar 

  5. Havelin LI (1999) The Norwegian Joint Registry. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 58:139–147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH, Harris WH, Poss R, Muller ME, et al (1990) Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:161–168

    Google Scholar 

  7. Malchau H, Herberts P, Söderman P, Odén A (2000) Prognosis of total hip replacement. Update and validation of results from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Registry 1979–1998. Department of Orthopaedics, Göteborg University, Sweden 1–16

  8. Müller U, Gautier E, Röder C, Busato A (2003) Influence of cup design on radiographic signs of aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 83:31–36

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paterson D (1993) The International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES). Int Orthop 16:11–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Röder C, El-Kerdi A, Grob D, Aebi A (2002) A European spine registry. Eur Spine J 11:303–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Röder C, Eggli S, Aebi M, Busato A (2003) The validity of clinical examination in diagnosing component loosening in THA. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rothwell AG (1999) Development of the New Zealand Joint Register. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 58:148–160

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Röder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Röder, C., Eggli, S., EL-Kerdi, A. et al. The International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES)—10-years experience. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 27, 259–261 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-003-0498-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-003-0498-x

Keywords

Navigation