Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection of exocrine dysfunction by MRI in patients with early chronic pancreatitis

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine if T1-weighted MR signal of the pancreas can be used to detect early CP.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 51 suspected CP patients, who had both secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) and an intraductal secretin stimulation test (IDST). There were 29 patients in normal and 22 patients in the low bicarbonate group. Bicarbonate level, total pancreatic juice volume, and excretory flow rate were recorded during IDST. Signal intensity ratio of pancreas (SIR), fat signal fraction, pancreatograms findings, and grade of duodenal filling were recorded on S-MRCP by two blinded radiologists.

Results

There was a significant difference in the signal intensity ratio of the pancreas to spleen (SIRp/s) between the normal and low bicarbonate groups (p < 0.0001). A significant positive correlation was found between pancreatic fluid bicarbonate level and SIRp/s (p < 0.0001). SIRp/s of 1.2 yielded sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 83% for detection of pancreatic exocrine dysfunction (AUC: 0.89).

Conclusion

T1-weighted MR signal of the pancreas has a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of parenchymal abnormalities related to exocrine dysfunction and can therefore be helpful in evaluation of suspected early CP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yadav D, Timmons L, Benson JT, Dierkhising RA, Chari ST (2011) Incidence, prevalence, and survival of chronic pancreatitis: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 106(12):2192–2199. doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchler MW, Martignoni ME, Friess H, Malfertheiner P (2009) A proposal for a new clinical classification of chronic pancreatitis. BMC Gastroenterol 9:93. doi:10.1186/1471-230X-9-93

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Forsmark CE (2000) The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 52(2):293–298. doi:10.1067/mge.2000.106889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cote GA, Smith J, Sherman S, Kelly K (2013) Technologies for imaging the normal and diseased pancreas. Gastroenterology 144(6):1262–1271 e1261. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chowdhury RS, Forsmark CE (2003) Review article: pancreatic function testing. Aliment Pharmacol Therapeutics 17(6):733–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowenfels AB, Sullivan T, Fiorianti J, Maisonneuve P (2005) The epidemiology and impact of pancreatic diseases in the United States. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 7(2):90–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Manes G, Kahl S, Glasbrenner B, Malfertheiner P (2000) Chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis and staging. Annali italiani di chirurgia 71(1):23–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nichols MT, Russ PD, Chen YK (2006) Pancreatic imaging: current and emerging technologies. Pancreas 33(3):211–220. doi:10.1097/01.mpa.0000227912.71202.2c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Toskes PP (1999) Update on diagnosis and management of chronic pancreatitis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 1(2):145–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dominguez-Munoz JE, Alvarez-Castro A, Larino-Noia J, Nieto L, Iglesias-Garcia J (2012) Endoscopic ultrasonography of the pancreas as an indirect method to predict pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 41(5):724–728. doi:10.1097/MPA.0b013e31823b5978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alvarez-Sanchez MV, Jenssen C, Faiss S, Napoleon B (2014) Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography: an overview of safety and complications. Surg Endosc 28(3):712–734. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3260-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stevens T, Lopez R, Adler DG, et al. (2010) Multicenter comparison of the interobserver agreement of standard EUS scoring and Rosemont classification scoring for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 71(3):519–526. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walsh TN, Rode J, Theis BA, Russell RC (1992) Minimal change chronic pancreatitis. Gut 33(11):1566–1571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cappeliez O, Delhaye M, Deviere J, et al. (2000) Chronic pancreatitis: evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function with MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 215(2):358–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Catalano MF, Lahoti S, Geenen JE, Hogan WJ (1998) Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography, and secretin test in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 48(1):11–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Denyer ME, Cotton PB (1979) Pure pancreatic juice studies in normal subjects and patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gut 20(2):89–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ochi K, Harada H, Mizushima T, Tanaka J, Matsumoto S (1997) Intraductal secretin test is as useful as duodenal secretin test in assessing exocrine pancreatic function. Dig Dis Sci 42(3):492–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gregg JA (1982) The intraductal secretin test: an adjunct to ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 28(3):199–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Matos C, Metens T, Deviere J, et al. (1997) Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 203(2):435–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zou KH, Tuncali K, Silverman SG (2003) Correlation and simple linear regression. Radiology 227(3):617–622. doi:10.1148/radiol.2273011499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Witt H, Apte MV, Keim V, Wilson JS (2007) Chronic pancreatitis: challenges and advances in pathogenesis, genetics, diagnosis, and therapy. Gastroenterology 132(4):1557–1573. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Winston CB, Mitchell DG, Outwater EK, Ehrlich SM (1995) Pancreatic signal intensity on T1-weighted fat saturation MR images: clinical correlation. J Magn ResonImaging 5(3):267–271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Trikudanathan G, Walker SP, Munigala S, et al. (2015) Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mri with secretin-stimulated mrcp for non-calcific chronic pancreatitis: a comparison with histopathology. Am J Gastroenterol 110(11):1598–1606. doi:10.1038/ajg.2015.297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mitchell DG, Winston CB, Outwater EK, Ehrlich SM (1995) Delineation of pancreas with MR imaging: multiobserver comparison of five pulse sequences. J Magn ResonImaging 5(2):193–199

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sica GT, Miller FH, Rodriguez G, McTavish J, Banks PA (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pancreatitis: evaluation of signal intensity and enhancement changes. J Magn ResonImaging 15(3):275–284

    Google Scholar 

  26. Watanabe H, Kanematsu M, Tanaka K, et al. (2014) Fibrosis and postoperative fistula of the pancreas: correlation with MR imaging findings–preliminary results. Radiology 270(3):791–799. doi:10.1148/radiol.13131194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Balci NC, Alkaade S, Magas L, Momtahen AJ, Burton FR (2008) Suspected chronic pancreatitis with normal MRCP: findings on MRI in correlation with secretin MRCP. J Magn Reson Imaging 27(1):125–131. doi:10.1002/jmri.21241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Balci NC, Smith A, Momtahen AJ, et al. (2010) MRI and S-MRCP findings in patients with suspected chronic pancreatitis: correlation with endoscopic pancreatic function testing (ePFT). J Magn Reson Imaging 31(3):601–606. doi:10.1002/jmri.22085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bali MA, Sztantics A, Metens T, et al. (2005) Quantification of pancreatic exocrine function with secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: normal values and short-term effects of pancreatic duct drainage procedures in chronic pancreatitis. Initial Results. Eur Radiol 15(10):2110–2121. doi:10.1007/s00330-005-2819-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sainani NI, Kadiyala V, Mortele K, et al. (2015) Evaluation of qualitative magnetic resonance imaging features for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 44(8):1280–1289. doi:10.1097/MPA.0000000000000466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sherman S, Freeman ML, Tarnasky PR, et al. (2014) Administration of secretin (RG1068) increases the sensitivity of detection of duct abnormalities by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 147(3):646–654.e642. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.05.035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Alkaade S, Cem Balci N, Momtahen AJ, Burton F (2008) Normal pancreatic exocrine function does not exclude MRI/MRCP chronic pancreatitis findings. J Clin Gastroenterol 42(8):950–955. doi:10.1097/MCG.0b013e31812f4ef5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Draganov P, Patel A, Fazel A, Toskes P, Forsmark C (2005) Prospective evaluation of the accuracy of the intraductal secretin stimulation test in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3(7):695–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Temel Tirkes.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Conflict of interest

Authors do not have any relevant conflict of interest with this study.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. T1

his article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Requirement for an informed consent was waived by the IRB.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tirkes, T., Fogel, E.L., Sherman, S. et al. Detection of exocrine dysfunction by MRI in patients with early chronic pancreatitis. Abdom Radiol 42, 544–551 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0917-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0917-2

Keywords

Navigation