Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mimickers of neoplasm on abdominal and pelvic CT

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The radiologist can encounter benign significant imaging findings on computed tomography that can be incorrectly interpreted as neoplasm. The authors review several benign findings and demonstrate several methods to differentiate these findings from more sinister pathology.

Conclusion

It is imperative for the radiologist to be cognizant of and how to correctly identify mimickers of pathology so that unnecessary interventions and surgeries are avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Connor AR, Whittaker C (2006) Radiologic findings that mimic malignancy. AJR 187:W357–W364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh AK, Levenson RB, Gervais DA, et al. (2007) Dropped gallstones and surgical clips after cholecystectomy: CT assessment. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31(5):758–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Habib E, Elhadad A (2003) Digestive complications of gallstones lost during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford) 5(2):118–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Atri M, Bonifacio A, Ryan M, et al. (2002) Dropped gallstones post laparoscopic cholecystectomy mimicking peritoneal seeding: CT and ultrasound features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26(6):1000–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ali MG, Coakley FV, Hricak H, et al. (1999) Complex posttransplantation abnormalities of renal allografts: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 211:95–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sebastià C, Quiroga S, Boyé R, et al. (2001) Helical CT in renal transplantation: normal findings and early and late complications. Radiographics 21:1103–1117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Amid PK (2004) Radiologic images of meshoma. A new phenomenon causing pain after prosthetic repair of abdominal wall hernias. Arch Surg 139(12):1297–1298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeung VH, Pearl JM, Coakley FV, et al. (2008) Computed tomographic appearance of Prolene Hernia System and polypropylene mesh plug inguinal hernia repair. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(4):529–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sella T, Mironov S, Hricak H (2005) Imaging of transposed ovaries in patients with cervical carcinoma. AJR 184:1602–1610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saksouk FA, Johnson SC (2004) Recognition of the ovaries and ovarian origin of pelvic masses with CT. Radiographics 24(Suppl 1):S133–S146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolfson JJ, Stowell DW (1969) Aberrant renal papilla simulating an intrarenal mass. Radiology 93:812–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar D, Cigtay OS, Klein LH (1977) Aberrant renal papilla. Br J Radiol 50:141–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenberger A, Abrams HL (1971) Radiology of the thoracic duct. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 111:807–820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pinto PS, Sirlin CB, Andrade-Barreto OA, et al. (2004) Cisterna chyli at routine abdominal MR imaging: a normal anatomic structure in the retrocrural space. Radiographics 24(3):809–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith TR, Grigoropoulos J (2002) The cisterna chili: incidence and characteristics on CT. Clin Imaging 26:18–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Arrivé L, Azizi L, Lewin M, et al. (2007) MR lymphography of abdominal and retroperitoneal lymphatic vessels. AJR 189(5):1051–1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gollub MJ, Castellino RA (1996) The cisterna chyli: a potential mimic of retrocrural lymphadenopathy on CT scans. Radiology 199(2):477–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhatt S, MacLennan G, Dogra V (2007) Renal pseudotumors. AJR 188(5):1380–1387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yitta S, Hecht EM, Mausner EV, et al. (2011) Normal or abnormal? Demystifying uterine and cervical contrast enhancement at multidetector CT. Radiographics 31(3):647–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim HJ, Byun JH, Park SH, et al. (2007) Focal fatty replacement of the pancreas: usefulness of chemical shift MRI. AJR 188(2):429–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Isserow JA, Siegelman ES, Mammone J (1999) Focal fatty infiltration of the pancreas: MR characterization with chemical shift imaging. AJR 173(5):1263–1265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, et al. (2004) The renal sinus: pathologic spectrum and multimodality imaging approach. Radiographics 24(Suppl 1):S117–S131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shin SM, Kim S, Lee JW, et al. (2007) Biliary abnormalities associated with portal biliopathy: evaluation on MR cholangiography. AJR 188(4):W341–W347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brady TM, Gross BH, Glazer GM, et al. (1985) Adrenal pseudomasses due to varices: angiographic-CT-MRI-pathologic correlations. AJR 145(2):301–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vahidid K, Joe BN, Meng M, et al. (2007) Review of atypical pelvic masses on CT and MRI: expanding the differential diagnosis. Clin Imaging 31:406–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Georgiades CS, Neyman EG, Francis IR, et al. (2002) Typical and atypical presentations of extramedullary hemopoiesis. AJR 179(5):1239–1243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gupta P, Naran A, Auh YH, et al. (2004) Focal intrahepatic extramedullary hematopoiesis presenting as fatty lesions. AJR 182(4):1031–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Surabhi VR, Menias C, Prasad SR, et al. (2008) Neoplastic and non-neoplastic proliferative disorders of the perirenal space: cross-sectional imaging findings. Radiographics 28(4):1005–1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Choi H, David CL, Katz RL, et al. (2004) Case 69: extramedullary hematopoiesis. Radiology 231(1):52–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fleming CR, Dickson ER, Harrison EG (1976) Splenosis: autotransplantation of splenic tissue. Am J Med 61:414–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pumberger W, Wiesbauer P, Leitha T (2001) Splenosis mimicking tumor recurrence in renal cell carcinoma: detection on selective spleen scintigraphy. J Pediatr Surg 36:1089–1091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Malik UF, Martin MR, Patel R, et al. (2010) Parenchymal thoracic splenosis: history and nuclear imaging without invasive procedures may provide diagnosis. J Clin Med Res 2(4):180–184

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Christopher J. Lisanti receives royalties from Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan B. Schwope.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwope, R.B., Reiter, M.J. & Lisanti, C.J. Mimickers of neoplasm on abdominal and pelvic CT. Abdom Imaging 40, 400–410 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0216-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0216-8

Keywords

Navigation