Skip to main content
Log in

Clay swelling mechanism in clay-bearing sandstones

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

Swelling clays in stone can generate damaging stresses during a wetting or a drying cycle, which lead to deterioration of building stones such as Portland Brownstone. There are two primary types of swelling identified for clays: short-range, ordered intracrystalline swelling, and long-range, continuous osmotic swelling. Identification of the swelling mode is important for understanding and ultimately preventing swelling damage. Through comparison of XRD and swelling experiments with cationic pretreatments and organic solvents, we demonstrate that intracrystalline swelling is the primary mode of swelling present in three different stones, including Portland Brownstone. The results highlight the importance of the counterbalancing cation to the swelling process, and a method for characterizing the intracrystalline swelling in sandstones is developed. Finally, the implications of long-term swelling behavior for stones are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech Rock Eng 6(4):189–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissada KK, Johns WD, Cheng FS (1967) Cation-dipole interactions of clay organic complexes. Clay Miner 7:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boek ES, Coveney PV, Skipper NT (1995) Monte Carlo modeling studies of hydrated Li-, Na-, and K-smectites: understanding the role of potassium as a clay swelling inhibitor. J Am Chem Soc 117:12608–12617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brindley GW (1966) Ethylene glycol and glycerol complexes of smectites and vermiculites. Clay Miner 6:237–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang FRC, Skipper NT, Sposito G (1998) Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations of electrical double-layer structure in potassium-montmorillonite hydrates. Langmuir 14(5):1201–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzini M, Leoni L, Lezzerini M, Cardelli R (2007) Relationships between mineralogical composition, water absorption and hydric dilatation in the ‘Macigno’ sandstones from Lunigiana (Massa, Tuscany). Eur J Mineral 19:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German WL, Harding DA (1971) Primary aliphatic alcohol-homoionic montmorillonite interactions. Clay Miner 9:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser R, Méring J (1968) Homogeneous hydration domains of the smectites. Cr hebd Séanc Acad Sci Paris 267:436–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez Gonzalez I, Higgins M, Scherer GW (2002) Hygric swelling of portland brownstone. In: Vandiver PB, Goodway M, Mass JL (eds) Materials issues in art and archaeology VI, MRS symposium proc vol 712. Mater Res Soc, Warrendale, pp 21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiminez Gonzalez I, Scherer GW (2004) Effect of swelling inhibitors on the swelling and stress relaxation of clay bearing stones. Environ Geol 46:364–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed AMO (2000) The role of clay minerals in marly soils on its stability. Eng Geol 57(3–4):193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Olphen H (1977) An introduction to clay colloid chemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Page AL, Burge WD, Ganje TJ, Garber MJ (1967) Potassium and ammonium fixation by vermiculitic soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 31:337–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Navarro C, Hansen E, Sebastian E, Ginell W (1997) The role of clays in the deterioration of Egyptian limestone sculptures. J Am Inst Cons 36(2):151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer GW, Jiménez González I (2005) Characterization of swelling in clay-bearing stone. In: Turkington AV (ed) Stone decay and conservation SP-390, Geological Soc Am, pp 51–61

  • Senkayi AL, Dixon JB, Hossner LR (1981) Transformation of chlorite to smectite through regularly interstratified intermediates. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:650–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangler T, Scherer GW (2008) Controlling swelling of Portland Brownstone J Mat Res (submitted)

  • Wendler E, Klemm DD, Snethlage R (1990) Consolidation and hydrophobic treatment of natural stone. In: Baker JM, Nixon PJ, Majumdar AJ, Davies H (eds) Proc 5th international conference on durability of building materials and components. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 203–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendler E, Charola AE, Fitzner B (1996) Easter Island tuff: laboratory studies for its consolidation. In: Riederer J (ed) Proc of the 8th international congress on deterioration and conservation of stone. Berlin, Germany, pp 1159–1170

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by grant MT-2210-07-NC-05 from the National Center for Preservation Technology and Training. The authors are indebted to Dr George Wheeler for providing samples of the stone from Aztec Monument National Park.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George W. Scherer.

Appendix

Appendix

To estimate the swelling layers per unit length, one must assume all swelling layers have the same interactions with the solvent. The scaling factor relating linear dimension change to interlayer spacing change is calculated by

$$ \frac{{\varepsilon _{{\text{s}},2} - \varepsilon _{{\text{s}},1} }}{{d_{001,2} - d_{001,1} }} $$

where ε s is the swelling strain, d 001 is the interlayer spacing, and the numerical subscripts refer to a particular solvent. This scaling factor gives the prescribed increase of the stone’s linear dimension with a particular interlayer spacing increase, so the number of swelling layers per unit length is simply the amount of individual interlayer spacing increases necessary to produce a particular change in the stone’s linear dimension. For example, Portland Brownstone will produce a 0.11 μm expansion per mm of stone with a 1 Å layer spacing increase, therefore there are (0.11 μm/1 Å) × 10,000 Å/μm = 1,100 interlayer expansions, or swelling layers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wangler, T., Scherer, G.W. Clay swelling mechanism in clay-bearing sandstones. Environ Geol 56, 529–534 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1380-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1380-3

Keywords

Navigation