Skip to main content
Log in

Division-Specific Differences in Bacterial Community Assembly of Two Alkaline Hot Spring Ecosystems from Yellowstone National Park

  • Notes and Short Communications
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fundamental issue in ecology is whether communities are random assemblages or, alternatively, whether there are rules that determine which combinations of taxa can co-occur. For microbial systems, in particular, the question of whether taxonomic groups exhibit differences in community organization remains unresolved but is critical for our understanding of community structure and function. Here, we used presence–absence matrices derived from bar-coded pyrosequencing data to evaluate the assembly patterns of eight bacterial divisions distributed along two Yellowstone National Park hot spring outflow channels. Four divisions (Cyanobacteria, Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, and Cytophaga–Flavobacterium–Bacteroides) exhibited less co-occurrence than expected by chance, with phototrophic taxa showing the strongest evidence for nonrandom community structure. We propose that both differences in environmental tolerance and competitive interactions within divisions contribute to these nonrandom assembly patterns. The higher degree of nonrandom structure observed for phototrophic taxa compared with the other divisions may be due in part to greater overlap in resource usage, as has been previously proposed for plant communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Gotelli NJ (1999) How do communities come together? Science 286:1684–1685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 342–444

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gotelli NJ, McCabe DJ (2002) Species co-occurrence: a meta-analysis of J.M. Diamond’s assembly rules model. Ecology 83:2091–2096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cracraft J (1988) Deep-history biogeography: retrieving the historical pattern of evolving continental biotas. Syst Biol 37:221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vuilleumier F, Simberloff D (1980) Ecology versus history as determinants of patchy and insular distribution in high Andean birds. In: Hecht MK, Steere WC, Wallace B (eds) Evolutionary biology, vol 12. Plenum, New York, pp 235–379

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bell G (2005) The co-distribution of species in relation to the neutral theory of community ecology. Ecology 86(7):1757–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 448

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horner-Devine MC, Silver JM, Leibold MA, Bohannan BJM, Colwell RK, Fuhrman JA, Green JL, Kuske CR, Martiny JBH, Muyzer G, Ovreås L, Reysenbach A-L, Smith VH (2007) A comparison of taxon co-occurrence patterns for macro- and microorganisms. Ecology 88:1345–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller SR, Strong AL, Jones KL, Ungerer MC (2009) Bar-coded pyrosequencing reveals shared bacterial community properties along the temperature gradients of two alkaline hot springs in Yellowstone National Park. Appl Env Microbiol 75:4565–4572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bryant DA, Costas AMG, Maresca JA, Chew AGM, Klatt CG, Bateson MM, Tallon LJ, Hostetler J, Nelson WC, Heidelberg JF, Ward DM (2007) Candidatus Chloracidobacterium thermophilum: an aerobic phototrophic Acidobacterium. Science 317:523–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ward DM, Ferris MJ, Nold SC, Bateson MM (1998) A natural view of microbial diversity within hot spring cyanobacterial mat communities. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:1353–1370

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stone L, Roberts A (1990) The checkerboard score and species distributions. Oecologia 85:74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gotelli NJ (2000) Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81:2606–2621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Allewalt JP, Bateson MM, Revsbech NP, Slack K, Ward DM (2006) Effect of temperature and light on growth of and photosynthesis by Synechococcus isolates typical of those predominating in the Octopus Spring microbial mat community of Yellowstone National Park. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:544–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller SR, Castenholz RW (2000) Evolution of thermotolerance in hot spring cyanobacteria of the genus Synechococcus. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4222–4229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Winsor Lowe, Jim Gannon, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation award EF-0801999 to S.R.M.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott R. Miller.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(XLSX 40 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 180 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weltzer, M.L., Miller, S.R. Division-Specific Differences in Bacterial Community Assembly of Two Alkaline Hot Spring Ecosystems from Yellowstone National Park. Microb Ecol 65, 537–540 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-013-0214-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-013-0214-3

Keywords

Navigation