Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric appendicitis: a systematic review

  • Pediatric Body MRI
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of appendicitis in children has rapidly increased recently. This change has been primarily driven by the desire to avoid CT radiation dose. This meta-analysis reviews the diagnostic performance of MRI for pediatric appendicitis and discusses current knowledge of cost-effectiveness. We used a conservative Haldane correction statistical method and found pooled diagnostic parameters including a sensitivity of 96.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94.3–97.8%), specificity of 96.1% (95% CI: 93.5–97.7%), positive predictive value of 92.0% (95% CI: 89.3–94.0%) and negative predictive value of 98.3% (95% CI: 97.3–99.0%), based on 11 studies. Assessment of patient outcomes associated with MRI use at two institutions indicates that time to antibiotics was 4.7 h and 8.2 h, time to appendectomy was 9.1 h and 13.9 h, and negative appendectomy rate was 3.1% and 1.4%, respectively. Alternative diagnoses were present in ~20% of cases, most commonly adnexal cysts and enteritis/colitis. Regarding technique, half-acquisition single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) pulse sequences are crucial. While gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted pulse sequences might be helpful, any benefit beyond non-contrast MRI has not been confirmed. Balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequences are generally noncontributory. Protocols do not need to exceed five sequences; four-sequence protocols are commonly utilized. Sedation generally is not indicated; patients younger than 5 years might be attempted based on the child’s ability to cooperate. A comprehensive pediatric cost-effectiveness analysis that includes both direct and indirect costs is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography — an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A et al (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167:700–707

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosines LA, Chow DS, Lampl BS et al (2014) Value of gadolinium-enhanced MRI in detection of acute appendicitis in children and adolescents. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koning JL, Naheedy JH, Kruk PG (2015) Does abdominal pain duration affect the accuracy of first-line MRI for pediatric appendicitis? Abdom Imaging 40:352–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh AK, Desai H, Novelline RA (2009) Emergency MRI of acute pelvic pain: MR protocol with no oral contrast. Emerg Radiol 16:133–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Inci E, Hocaoglu E, Aydin S et al (2011) Efficiency of unenhanced MRI in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparison with Alvarado scoring system and histopathological results. Eur J Radiol 80:253–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Incesu L, Coskun A, Selcuk MB et al (1997) Acute appendicitis: MR imaging and sonographic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:669–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hormann M, Paya K, Eibenberger K et al (1998) MR imaging in children with nonperforated acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced MR imaging in sonographically selected cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:467–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cobben L, Groot I, Kingma L et al (2009) A simple MRI protocol in patients with clinically suspected appendicitis: results in 138 patients and effect on outcome of appendectomy. Eur Radiol 19:1175–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bayraktutan U, Oral A, Kantarci M et al (2014) Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in detecting acute appendicitis in children: comparison with conventional MRI and surgical findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 39:1518–1524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Orth RC, Guillerman RP, Zhang W et al (2014) Prospective comparison of MR imaging and US for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis. Radiology 272:233–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thieme ME, Leeuwenburgh MM, Valdehueza ZD et al (2014) Diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance of MRI in children with suspected appendicitis. Eur Radiol 24:630–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson AK, Filippi CG, Andrews T et al (2012) Ultrafast 3-T MRI in the evaluation of children with acute lower abdominal pain for the detection of appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:1424–1430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moore MM, Gustas CN, Choudhary AK et al (2012) MRI for clinically suspected pediatric appendicitis: an implemented program. Pediatr Radiol 42:1056–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koning JL, Naheedy JH, Kruk PG (2014) Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MR for acute appendicitis and alternative causes of abdominal pain in children. Pediatr Radiol 44:948–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kulaylat AN, Moore MM, Engbrecht BW et al (2015) An implemented MRI program to eliminate radiation from the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 50:1359–1363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Herliczek TW, Swenson DW, Mayo-Smith WW (2013) Utility of MRI after inconclusive ultrasound in pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis: retrospective review of 60 consecutive patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:969–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aspelund G, Fingeret A, Gross E et al (2014) Ultrasonography/MRI versus CT for diagnosing appendicitis. Pediatrics 133:586–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dillman J, Gadepalli S, MD, Sroufe N et al. (2015) Equivocal pediatric appendicitis: unenhanced MR imaging protocol for nonsedated children — a clinical effectiveness study. Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150941

  22. Bhaumik DK, Amatya A, Normand SL et al (2012) Meta-analysis of rare binary adverse event data. J Am Stat Assoc 107:555–567

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Haldane JB (1956) The estimation and significance of the logarithm of a ratio of frequencies. Ann Hum Genet 20:309–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Greenland S (2000) Small-sample bias and correction for conditional maximum-likelihood odds-ratio estimators. Biostatistics 1:113–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M (2014) Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health 72:39

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Harbord RM, Whiting P (2009) Metandi: meta–analysis of diagnostic accuracy using hierarchical logistic regression. Stata J 9:211–229

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barger R, Nandalur K (2010) Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of appendicitis in adults: a meta-analysis. Acad Radiol 17:1211–1216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Moore MM, Brian JM, Methratta ST et al (2014) MRI for clinically suspected pediatric appendicitis: case interpretation. Pediatr Radiol 44:605–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Trout AT, Sanchez R, Ladino-Torres MF (2012) Reevaluating the sonographic criteria for acute appendicitis in children: a review of the literature and a retrospective analysis of 246 cases. Acad Radiol 19:1382–1394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ganguli S, Raptopoulos V, Komlos F et al (2006) Right lower quadrant pain: value of the nonvisualized appendix in patients at multidetector CT. Radiology 241:175–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Garcia K, Hernanz-Schulman M, Bennett DL et al (2009) Suspected appendicitis in children: diagnostic importance of normal abdominopelvic CT findings with nonvisualized appendix. Radiology 250:531–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Moore MM, Kulaylat AN, Brian JM et al (2015) Alternative diagnoses at paediatric appendicitis MRI. Clin Radiol 70:881–889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Inci E, Kilickesmez O, Hocaoglu E et al (2011) Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur Radiol 21:768–775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fonseca AL, Schuster KM, Kaplan LJ et al (2014) The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of suspected appendicitis in pregnancy: shortened length of stay without increase in hospital charges. JAMA Surg 149:687–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Trout AT, Sanchez R, Ladino-Torres MF et al (2012) A critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting: how can we improve the diagnostic value of sonography? Pediatr Radiol 42:813–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors recognize the assistance of Chelsea Stephens and Lee Ann Smith in manuscript formatting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael M. Moore.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Dillman receives grant support from Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. Drs. Moore, Kulaylat, Hollenbeak, Engbrecht, and Methratta have no financial interests to disclose. Authors have no investigational or off-label uses to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moore, M.M., Kulaylat, A.N., Hollenbeak, C.S. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric appendicitis: a systematic review. Pediatr Radiol 46, 928–939 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3557-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3557-3

Keywords

Navigation