Skip to main content
Log in

Utility of MR urography in children suspected of having ectopic ureter

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Conventional imaging modalities are limited in the assessment of complex lower urinary tract anomalies including ectopic insertion of ureters. MR urography can be useful in these situations.

Objective

To share our experience with MR urography in assessing lower urinary tract anomalies and to determine its accuracy in depicting ectopic ureters.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective review of all MR urography examinations done between November 2007 and March 2013 to note the presence or absence of duplex kidneys and insertion of ureters. We reviewed patient charts, surgical findings and results of other investigations including cystoscopy with retrograde ureterogram in order to establish presence or absence of ectopic ureter. This served as a reference standard against which we compared MR urography results.

Results

Of 22 MR urography examinations (3 boys, 19 girls; age range 3–16 years, mean 9.2 years) performed during the study period, 19 were performed to rule out ectopic ureters, two to assess complex anatomy and one to rule out crossing vessel in ureteropelvic junction obstruction. MR urography showed ectopic ureter in 9/19 children; one proved to be a false-positive. MR urography correctly showed normal insertion in 7/19 children. In the remaining 3/19 children distal ureter could not be seen, hence insertion was indeterminate on MR urography. One of these children had an ectopic ureter on cystoscopy and surgery. Statistical analysis showed MR urography’s sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) to be 88.8–100%, 70–90%, 75–88.8% and 90–100% for the detection of ectopic ureter.

Conclusion

MR urography is highly accurate in the assessment of ectopic ureters. In incontinent girls, MR urography should be the method of choice for depicting or ruling out ectopic ureter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avni FE, Nicaise N, Hall M et al (2001) The role of MR imaging for the assessment of complicated duplex kidneys in children: preliminary report. Pediatr Radiol 31:215–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Riccabona M, Ruppert-Kohlmayr A, Ring E et al (2004) Potential impact of pediatric MR urography on the imaging algorithm in patients with a functional single kidney. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:795–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ehammer T, Riccabona M, Maier E (2011) High-resolution MR for evaluation of lower urogenital tract malformations in infants and children: feasibility and preliminary experiences. Eur J Radiol 78:388–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Joshi M, Parelkar S, Shah H et al (2009) Role of magnetic resonance urography in the diagnosis of single-system ureteral ectopia with congenital renal dysplasia: a tertiary care center experience in India. J Pediatr Surg 44:1984–1987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berrocal T, Lopez-Pereira P, Arjonilla A et al (2002) Anomalies of the distal ureter, bladder, and urethra in children: embryologic, radiologic, and pathologic features. Radiographics 22:1139–1164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Escala JM, Cadena Gonzalez Y, Lopez PJ et al (2008) Ectopic ureter in pediatrics. A change in the way of presentation. Arch Esp Urol 61:507–510

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roy Choudhury S, Chadha R, Bagga D et al (2008) Spectrum of ectopic ureters in children. Pediatr Surg Int 24:819–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lipson JA, Coakley FV, Baskin LS et al (2008) Subtle renal duplication as an unrecognized cause of childhood incontinence: diagnosis by magnetic resonance urography. J Pediatr Urol 4:398–400

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rohrschneider WK, Hoffend J, Becker K et al (2000) Combined static-dynamic MR urography for the simultaneous evaluation of morphology and function in urinary tract obstruction. I. Evaluation of the normal status in an animal model. Pediatr Radiol 30:511–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grattan-Smith JD (2008) MR urography: anatomy and physiology. Pediatr Radiol 38:S275–S280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Khrichenko D, Darge K (2010) Functional analysis in MR urography – made simple. Pediatr Radiol 40:182–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vivier PH, Dolores M, Taylor M et al (2010) MR urography in children. Part 1: how we do the F0 technique. Pediatr Radiol 40:732–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Riccabona M, Avni FE, Dacher JN et al (2010) ESPR uroradiology task force and ESUR pediatric working group: imaging and procedural recommendations in pediatric uroradiology, part III. Minutes of the ESPR uroradiology task force minisymposium on intravenous urography, uro-CT and MR-urography in childhood. Pediatr Radiol 40:1315–1320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Govind B. Chavhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Figueroa, V.H., Chavhan, G.B., Oudjhane, K. et al. Utility of MR urography in children suspected of having ectopic ureter. Pediatr Radiol 44, 956–962 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2905-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2905-4

Keywords

Navigation