Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Paediatric adverse drug reactions reported to the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System from 2004 to 2009

  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study was conducted to evaluate relevant new information about ADRs reported in the Spanish paediatric population over a 6-year period.

Methods

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for individuals aged 0–17 years reported to the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System from 2004 to 2009 were analysed with respect to time, age and sex, category of ADR [System Organ Class (SOC)], seriousness, suspected medicines [level 2 of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System] and type of reporter.

Results

In total, 4,279 ADR reports corresponding to 8,196 ADRs were analysed, approximately two ADRs per report. The rate of paediatric ADR reports in 2009 was 165 per million, of which nearly half (46 %) were for children (age group 2–11 years). Similar total numbers of ADRs were reported for boys and girls. The most frequent ADRs reported were from the following SOCs: general disorders and administration site conditions (34 %); skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (15 %); nervous system disorders (14 %). Reports encompassed medicines from various ATC groups: vaccines and anti-infectives for systemic use (67 %); nervous system (9 %); respiratory system (9 %). On average, 37 % of ADRs were classified as serious. There were 33 fatal ADRs, and 35 % of the paediatric population associated with the ADR notifications required hospitalization or extended hospital stay.

Conclusions

In Spain, ADR reporting rate in the paediatric population has increased since 2004. The proportion of suspected ADR reports related to vaccines was predominant, which highlights the important role played by nurses. ADR notification of congenital malformations in newborn infants highlights the need for joint action between the Spanish System of Pharmacovigilance of Medicines for Human Use (SEFV-H) and paediatricians, obstetricians and gynaecologists. The publication of safety reports by regulatory agencies is determinant for the increased number of ADR notifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sturkenboom M, Verhamme K, Nicolosi A, Murray M et al (2008) Drug use in children: cohort study in three European countries. Br Med J 337:a2245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choonara I, Gill A, Nunn A (1996) Drug toxicity and surveillance in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol 42(4):407–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Choonara I (2000) Clinical trials of medicines in children. Br Med J 321(7269):1093–1094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clavenna A, Bonati M (2009) Adverse drug reactions in childhood: a review of prospective studies and safety alerts. Arch Dis Child 94:724–728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jonville-Bera A, Giraudeau B, Blanc P, Beau-Salinas F, Autret-Leca E (2002) Frequency of adverse drug reactions in children: a prospective study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 53:207–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Temple M, Robinson R, Millar J, Hayes J, Nahata M (2004) Frequency and preventiability of adverse drug reactions in paediatric patients. Drug Saf 27(11):819–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kimlnad E, Rane A, Ufer M, Panagiotidis G (2005) Paediatric adverse drug reactions reported in Sweden from 1987 to 2001. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 14:493–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aagaard L, Blicher C, Holme E (2010) Adverse drug reactions in paediatric population in Denmark: a retrospective analysis of reports made to the Danish Medicines Agency from 1998 to 2007. Drug Safety 33(4):327–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng K, Masters S, Stephenson T, Cooke R, Ferner R, Ashworth M, Nunn A (2008) Identification of suspected fatal adverse drug reactions by paediatricians: a UK surveillance study. Arch Dis Child 93:609–611

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morales-Olivas FJ, Martínez-Mir I, Ferrer JM, Rubio E, Palop V (2000) Adverse drug reactions in children reported by means of the yellow card in Spain. J Clin Epidemiol 53(10):1076–1080

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Manso G, Hidalgo A, Carvajal A, De Abajo FJ (2010) Los primeros 25 años del Sistema Español de Farmacovigilancia de Medicamentos de Uso Humano. Ediciones de la Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo

  12. Clarkson A, Conroy S, Burroughs K, Choonara I (2004) Surveillance for adverse drug reactions in children: a paediatric regional monitoring centre. Paediatr Perinat Drug Ther 6:20–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clarkson A, Choonara I (2002) Surveillance for fatal suspected adverse drug reactions in the UK. Arch Dis Child 87:462–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the public Foundation: Fundación Canaria de Investigación y Salud (FUNCIS), PI 40/06.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Aldea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aldea, A., García Sánchez-Colomer, M., Fernández Quintana, E. et al. Paediatric adverse drug reactions reported to the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System from 2004 to 2009. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 68, 1329–1338 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-012-1255-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-012-1255-0

Keywords

Navigation