Abstract
Objective
Triflusal has been shown to exert neuroprotective effects by downregulating molecules considered responsible for the development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to characterize plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics of the main active metabolite of triflusal—HTB (2-hydroxy-4-trifluoro-methylbenzoic acid)—in healthy volunteers.
Methods
Data from two studies were combined. Study A: subjects received single oral doses of triflusal 900 mg. Triflusal and HTB plasma concentrations were extensively measured. Study B: triflusal 600 mg once daily was administered orally for 14 days. HTB plasma and CSF concentrations were determined in healthy volunteers. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using NONMEM.
Results
A one-compartmental model with rapid first-order absorption for triflusal and first-order formation of HTB best described plasma concentrations. Triflusal elimination rate constant was 50 times faster than that estimated for the metabolite. CSF concentrations of HTB ranged between 0.011 μg/ml and 0.341 μg/ml. A CSF–plasma partition coefficient of 0.002 and a ke0 value of 0.059 h−1 were estimated by means of population modeling.
Conclusion
In the present study in healthy volunteers, HTB penetrated into the CSF in a range of concentrations experimentally proven to have protective effects in AD. These concentrations suggest that triflusal could be used in the treatment of central nervous system diseases in doses similar to those used in cardiovascular diseases. Access to the CSF compartment was characterized by a slow equilibrium rate constant and a low CSF–plasma partition coefficient.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McGeer PL, McGeer EG (1995) The inflammatory response system of brain: implications for therapy of Alzheimer and other neurodegenerative diseases. Brain Res Rev 21(2):195–218
McGeer PL, Schulzer M, McGeer EG (1996) Arthritis and anti-inflammatory agents as possible protective factors for Alzheimer’s disease: a review of 17 epidemiologic studies. Neurology 47(2):425–432
Mackenzie IR, Hao C, Munoz DG (1995) Role of microglia in senile plaque formation. Neurobiol Aging 16(5):797–804
McNeely W, Goa KL (1998) Triflusal. Drugs 55(6):823–833
García Rafanell J, Planas JM, Puig Parellada P (1979) Comparison of the inhibitory effects of acetylsalicylic and triflusal on enzymes related to thrombosis. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 237(2):343–350
Rutllant Borrel M, Felez J, Diaz JM, Vicente JM, García Rafanell J (1977) Effect of triflusal (UR-1501) a potential antithrombotic agent, on blood coagulation and platelet antiaggregation in man. Curr Ther Res 22:510–521
Domínguez MJ, Vacas H, Saez Y, Olabarria I, Velasco A, Iriarte JA, Forn J (1985) Effects on triflusal with prosthetic heart valves. Clin Ther 7:357–360
De La Cruz JP, Pavía J, Bellido I, González MC, Sánchez de la Cuesta F (1988) Platelet antiaggregator effect of triflusal human whole blood. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 10(4):273–277
Bucham A (1992) Advances in cerebral ischemia: experimental approaches. Neurol Clin 10:49–61
Fernández de Arriba A, Cavalcanti F, Miralles A, Bayón Y, Alonso M, Merlos M, García-Rafanell J, Forn J (1999) Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 expression by 4-trifluoromethyl derivatives of salicylate, triflusal and its deacetylated metabolite 2-hydroxy-4-trifluoromethylbenzoic acid. Mol Pharmacol 4:753–761
Bayón A, Alonso A, Sánchez Crespo M (1999) 4-trifluoromethyl derivatives of salicylate, triflusal and its main metabolite 2-hydroxy-4-trifluoromethylbenzoic acid, are potent inhibitors of nuclear factor B activation. Br J Pharmacol 126:1359–1366
Ramis J, Mis R, Forn J, Torrent J, Gorina E, Jane F (1991) Pharmacokinetics of triflusal and its main metabolite HTB in healthy subjects following a single oral dose. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 16(4):269–273
Grasela TH, Sheiner LB (1991) Pharmacostatistical modeling for observational data. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 19:25S–36S
Beal SL, Sheiner LB (1998) NONMEM users’ guides. NONMEM project group. University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco
Davidian M, Giltinan DM (1995) Non linear models for repeated measurement data. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Sheiner LB, Stanski DR, Vozeh S, Miller R, Ham J (1979) Simultaneous modelling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application to d-tubocurarine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 25:358–371
Jonsson EN, Karlsson MO (1999) Xpose: an S-PLUS based population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model building aid for NONMEM. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 58:51–64
de Lange EC, Danhof M (2002) Considerations in the use of cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics to predict brain target concentrations in the clinical setting: implications of the barriers between blood and brain. Clin Pharmacokinet 41(10):691–703
Acarin L, González B, Castellano B (2001) Triflusal post-treatment inhibits glial nuclear Factor-kB, downregulates the glial response, and is neuroprotective in an exocitotoxic injury model in postnatal brain. Stroke 32:2394–2402
Acarin L, González B, Castellano B (2002) Decrease of proinflammatory molecules correlates with neuroprotective effect of the fluorinated salicylate triflusal after postnatal exocitotoxic damage. Stroke 23:2499–2505
Baker SD, Heideman RL, Crom WR, Kuttesch JF, Gajja A, Stewart CF (1996) Cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics and penetration of continuous infusion topotecan in children with central nervous system tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharm 37(3):195–202
Sato S, Kitawa S, Nakajima M, Shimada K, Honda A, Miyazaki H (2001) Assessment of tear concentrations on therapeutic drug monitoring. II. Pharmacokinetic analysis of valproic acid in guinea pig serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and tears. Pharm Res 18(4):500–509
Anderson BJ, Holford NHG, Wollard GA, Chan PLS (1998) Paracetamol plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol 46:237–243
Rowland M, Tozer TN (1995a) Clinical pharmacokinetics: concepts and applications. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 114–116
Rowland M, Tozer TN (1995b) Clinical pharmacokinetics: concepts and applications. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 140–142
Tanaka H, Mizojiri K (1999) Drug-protein binding and blood-brain barrier permeability. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 288:912–918
Cruz-Fernández JM, López-Bescos L, García-Dorado D, López-García Aranda V, Cabades A, Martín-Jadraque L, Velasco JA, Castro-Beiras A, Torres F, Marfil F, Navarro E (2000) Randomized comparative trial of triflusal and aspirin following acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 21(6):457–465
Matias-Guiu J, Ferro JM, Alvarez-Sabín J, Torres F, Jiménez MD, Lago A, Melo T, TACIP Investigators (2003) Comparison of triflusal and aspirin for prevention of vascular events in patients after cerebral infarction. Stroke 34(4):840–848
Culebras A, Rotta-Escalante R, Vila J, Domínguez R, Abiuisi G, Famulari A, Rey R, Bauso-Toselli L, Gori H, Ferrari J, Reich E, TAPIRSS investigators (2004) Triflusal vs aspirin for prevention of cerebral infarction. A randomized stroke study. Neurology 62:1073–1080
Acknowledgements
Financial sources of support were provided by J Uriach & Cia, Grupo Uriach (Barcelona, Spain)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valle, M., Barbanoj, M.J., Donner, A. et al. Access of HTB, main metabolite of triflusal, to cerebrospinal fluid in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 61, 103–111 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-004-0887-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-004-0887-0