Skip to main content
Log in

Factors influencing the radial-tangential illusion in haptic perception

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the radial-tangential illusion, in the horizontal plane, arm movements executed in directions radial to the trunk are sensed to be longer than movements of the same length in the orthogonal direction. It has been suggested that the illusion arises from the fact that radially directed movements are executed more slowly and require more effort. These suggestions were tested in a series of experiments, using a robotically controlled manipulandum. In all of the experiments subjects grasped the handle of the manipulandum, in some cases exploring the virtual boundary of a rectangle, while in others being guided along a rectangular contour by the robot. In a two-alternative forced choice design, subjects reported whether the rectangle was wide or narrow. In a control experiment, subjects manifested the radial-tangential illusion. Contrary to the hypothesis, the magnitude of this illusion was not altered when a resistive force was added in the tangential direction or when the ratio of movement times in the tangential and radial directions was changed. However, when the contour was explored in the counterclockwise direction, the illusion was much smaller than when it was explored in the clockwise direction. A second series of experiments, in which subjects only explored two sides (i.e., an L-shape), demonstrated that this effect arose from distortions induced by the serial ordering of the exploratory movements. The illusion was much smaller when the radial segment was explored first. We suggest that this distortion arises from the serial nature of haptic exploration, in which the length of the initial segment decreases as it is stored in working memory for subsequent comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong L, Marks LE (1999) Haptic perception of linear extent. Percept Psychophys 61:1211–1226

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng MF (1968) Tactile-kinesthetic perception of length. Am J Psychol 81:74–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davidon RS, Cheng M-F (1964) Apparent distance in a horizontal plane with tactile-kinesthetic stimuli. Q J Exp Psychol 16:277–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day RH, Avery GC (1970) Absence of the horizontal–vertical illusion in haptic space. J Exp Psychol 83:172–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deregowski J, Ellis HD (1972) Effect of stimulus orientation upon haptic perception of the horizontal–vertical illusion. J Exp Psychol 95:14–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fasse ED, Hogan N, Kay BA, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2000) Haptic interaction with virtual objects. Biol Cybern 82:69–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Lolley S (2001) The inertial anisotropy of the arm is accurately predicted during movement planning. J Neurosci 21:1361–1369

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI, Burke D (1992) Kinaesthetic signals and muscle contraction. Trends Neurosci 15:62–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gentaz E, Hatwell Y (2004) Geometrical haptic illusions: the role of exploration in the Muller-Lyer, vertical–horizontal, and Delboeuf illusions. Psychon Bull Rev 11:31–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gnadt JW, Bracewell RM, Andersen RA (1991) Sensorimotor transformation during eye movements to remembered visual targets. Vision Res 31:693–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin AW, Wheat HE (2004) Sensory signals in neural populations underlying tactile perception and manipulation. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:53–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatwell Y (1960) Ètude de quelques illusions géométriques tactiles chez les aveugles. L’année Psychol 1:11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller MA, Calcaterra JA, Burson LL, Green SL (1997) The tactual horizontal–vertical illusion depends on radial motion of the entire arm. Percept Psychophys 59:1297–1311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques DY, Soechting JF (2003) Bias and sensitivity in the haptic perception of geometry. Exp Brain Res 150:95–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques DY, Soechting JF (2005) Approaches to the study of haptic sensing. J Neurophysiol 93:3036–3043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques DY, Flanders M, Soechting JF (2004) Haptic synthesis of shapes and sequences. J Neurophysiol 91:1808–1821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan N, Kay BA, Fasse ED, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1990) Haptic illusions: experiments on human manipulation and perception of “virtual objects. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 55:925–931

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kesten H (1958) Accelerated stochastic approximation. Ann Math Stat 29:41–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL, Collins A, Wardell J (1987) Exploring environments by hand or foot: time-based heuristics for encoding distance in movement space. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 13:606–614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti FM, Lederman SJ (1983) The haptic radial-tangential effect—2 tests of Wong’s moments-of-inertia hypothesis. Bull Psychon Soc 21:43–46

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre J, Stratta F, Lacquaniti F (1998) Short-term memory for reaching to visual targets: psychophysical evidence for body-centered reference frames. J Neurosci 18:8423–8435

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millar S, Al-Attar Z (2000) Vertical and bisection bias in active touch. Perception 29:481–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millar S, Al-Attar Z (2004) External and body-centered frames of reference in spatial memory: evidence from touch. Percept Psychophys 66:515–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillard J, Brouchon M (1968) Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. In: Freedman SJ (eds) The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior. Dorsey, Homewood, pp 37–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Revesz G (1950) Psychology and art of the blind. Longmans Green, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Robles-De-La-Torre G, Hayward V (2001) Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature 412:445–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romo R, Salinas E (2001) Touch and go: decision-making mechanisms in somatosensation. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:107–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romo R, Hernandez A, Zainos A, Lemus L, Brody CD (2002) Neuronal correlates of decision-making in secondary somatosensory cortex. Nat Neurosci 5:1217–1225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romo R, Hernandez A, Zainos A (2004) Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision in ventral premotor cortex. Neuron 41:165–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Poizner H (2005) The use of motion cues in the haptic sense of circularity. Exp Brain Res 165:413–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Buneo CA, Herrmann U, Flanders M (1995) Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders’ law apply to arm movement? J Neurosci 15:6271–6280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treutwein B (1995) Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Res 35:2503–2522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong TS (1977) Dynamic properties of radial and tangential movements as determinants of the haptic horizontal–vertical illusion with an L figure. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 3:151–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wydoodt P, Gentaz E, Streri A (2006) Role of force cues in the haptic estimations of a virtual length. Exp Brain Res 171:481–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Martha Flanders for helpful discussions during the course of this work.

This work was supported by NIH Grant NS15018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John F. Soechting.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McFarland, J., Soechting, J.F. Factors influencing the radial-tangential illusion in haptic perception. Exp Brain Res 178, 216–227 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0727-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0727-9

Keywords

Navigation