Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous determination of 405 pesticide residues in grain by accelerated solvent extraction then gas chromatography-mass spectrometry or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method has been established for simultaneous determination of 405 pesticide residues in grain, using accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), solid-phase extraction (SPE), and GC-MS and LC-MS-MS. The method was based on appraisal of the GC-MS and LC-MS-MS characteristics of 660 pesticides, their efficiency of extraction from grain, and their purification. Samples of grain (10 g) were mixed with Celite 545 (10 g) and the mixture was placed in a 34-mL cell of an accelerated solvent extractor and extracted with acetonitrile in the static state for 3 min with two cycles at 1,500 psig and at 80°C. For the 362 pesticides determined by GC-MS, half of the extracts were cleaned with an Envi-18 cartridge and then further cleaned with Envi-Carb and Sep-Pak NH2 cartridges in series. The pesticides were eluted with acetonitrile-toluene, 3:1, and the eluates were concentrated and used for analysis after being exchanged with hexane twice. For the 43 pesticides determined by LC-MS-MS the other half of the extracts were cleaned with Sep-Pak Alumina N cartridge and further cleaned with Envi-Carb and Sep-Pak NH2 cartridges. Pesticides were eluted with acetonitrile-toluene, 3:1. After evaporation to dryness the eluates were diluted with acetonitrile-water, 3:2, and used for analysis. In the linear range of each pesticide the linear correlation coefficient r was equal to or greater than 0.956 and 94% of linear correlation coefficients were greater than 0.990. At low, medium, and high fortification levels, at the limit of detection (LOD), twice the LOD and ten times LOD, respectively, recoveries ranged from 42 to 132%; for 382 pesticides, or 94.32%, recovery was from 60 to 120%. The relative standard deviation (RSD) was always below 38% and was below 30% for 391 pesticides, or 96.54%. The LOD was 0.0005–0.3000 mg kg−1. The proposed method is suitable for determination of 405 pesticide residues in grain such as maize, wheat, oat, rice, and barley, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luke MA, Froberg JE, Masumoto HT (1975) J AOAC 58:1020–1026

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Luke MA, Froberg JE, Doose GM, Masumoto HT (1981) J AOAC 64(5):1187–1195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liao W, Toe T, Cusick WG (1991) J AOAC 74(3):554–565

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Podhorniak LV, Negron JF, Griffith FDJ (2001) J AOAC Int. 84(3):873–890

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Podhorniak LV, Schenck FJ, Krynitsky A, Griffith FDJ (2004) J AOAC Int 87(5):1237–1251

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cook J, Beckett MP, Beliford B, Hammock W, Engel M (1999) J AOAC Int 82(6):1419–1435

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lehotay SJ, Mastovska K, Schenck FJ (2003) Abstracts of Papers, 225th ACS National Meeting

  8. Mastovska K, Lehotay SJ, Stajnbaher D, Schenck FJ (2003) J AOAC Int 86(2):412–431

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lehotay SJ, Mastovska K (2004) Abstracts of Papers, 228th ACS National Meeting

  10. Pardue JR (1995) J AOAC Int 78(3):856–862

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schenck FJ, King VH (2002) J Environ Sci Health B 35(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mercer GE, Jeffrey JA (2004) J AOAC Int 87(5):1224–1236

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ueno E, Oshima H, Saito I, Matsumoto H, Nakazawa H (2004) J Food Hyg Soc Japan 45(4):212–217

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ueno E, Oshima H, Saito I, Matsumoto H (2002) J Food Hyg Soc Japan 43(2):80–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ueno E, Oshima H, Saito I, Matsumoto H (2001) J Food Hyg Soc Japan 42(6):385–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ueno E, Oshima H, Saito I, Matsumoto H, Nakazawa H (2000) J Food Hyg Soc Japan 41(3):178–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ueno E, Oshima H, Saito I, Matsumoto H, Yoshimura Y, Nakazawa H (2004) J AOAC Int 87(4):1003–1015

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ueno E, Oshima H, Saito I, Matsumoto H (2003) J AOAC Int 86(6):1241–1251

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Obana H, Kikuchi K, Okihashi M, Hori S (1997) Analyst 122:217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Obana H, Okihashi M, Hori S (1998) J Food Hyg Soc Japan 39:172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Obana H, Kazuhiko K, Okihashi M, Kakimoto S, Hori S (1999) Analyst 124:1159–1165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Obana H, Akutsu K, Okihashi M, Hori S (2001) Analyst 126:1529–1534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoshii K, Tsumura Y, Nakamura Y, Ishimitsu S, Tonogai Y, Tsuchiya T, Kimura M, Sekiguchi Y (1999) J Food Hyg Soc Japan 40(1):68–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kondo H, Amakawa E, Sato H, Aoyagi Y, Yazuo K (2003) J Food Hyg Soc Japan 44(3):161–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fillon J, Hindle R, Lacroix M, Selwyn J (1995) J AOAC Int 78(5):1252–1266

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fillon J, Sauve F, Selwyn J ( 2000) J AOAC Int 83(3):698–713

    Google Scholar 

  27. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Laboratory Services, (2004) PMR-005-V1.1 Determination of Pesticides in Difficult Matrix Fruit and Vegetable (With Solid Phase Extraction Clean-Up and GC–MSD and HPLC Fluorescence Detection)

  28. Chun OK, Kang HG, Kim MH (2003) J AOAC Int 86(4):823–831

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stan HJ (2000) J Chromatogr A 892:347–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stan HJ, Linkerhagner M (1996) J Chromatogr A 750:369–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Roos AH, van Munsteren AJ, Nab FM, Tuinstra LGMTh (1987) Anal Chim Acta 196:95–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tuinstra LGMTh, van de Spreng P, Gaikhorst P (1994) Intern J Environ Anal Chem 58:81–91

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kok AD, Hiemstra M (1992) J AOAC Int 75(6):1063–1072

    Google Scholar 

  34. Agueera A, Contreras M, Crespo J, Fernandez-Alba AR (2002) Analyst 127(3):347–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gamon M, Lleo C, Ten A (2001) J AOAC Int 84(4):1029–1216

    Google Scholar 

  36. Arrebola FJ, Vidal JLM, Rodriguez MJG, Frenich AG, Morito NS (2003) J Chromatogr A 1005:131–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ortelli D, Edder P, Corvi C (2004) Anal Chim Acta 520(1–2):33–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pang GF, Fan CL, Chao YZ (1994) J AOAC Int 77(3):738–747

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Pang GF, Fan CL, Chao YZ, Zhao, TS (1994) J Chromatogr A 667:348–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Pang GF, Zhao TS, Chao YZ, Fan CL (1994) J AOAC Int 77(6):1634–1638

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Pang GF, Chao YZ, Liu XS, Fan CL (1995) J AOAC Int 78(6):1474–1480

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Pang GF, Chao YZ, Fan, CL, Zhang JJ, Li XM (1999) J AOAC Int 82(1):186–212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. L00.00-34 Analysis of Foodstuffs, Modular Multiple Analytical Method for the Determination of Pesticide Residues in Foodstuffs, 1999

  44. SW-846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Method 3545 (USEPA)

  45. Richter BE, Jones BA, Ezzell JL, Porter NL, Avdalovic N, Pohl C (1996) Anal Chem 68:1033–1039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mastovska K, Lehotay SJ (2004) J Chromatogr A 1040:259–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo-Fang Pang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pang, GF., Liu, YM., Fan, CL. et al. Simultaneous determination of 405 pesticide residues in grain by accelerated solvent extraction then gas chromatography-mass spectrometry or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 384, 1366–1408 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-0237-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-0237-9

Keywords

Navigation