Skip to main content
Log in

When will a Dictator be Good?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dictatorship is the predominant political system in many developing countries. However, different dictators act quite differently: a good dictator implements growth-enhancing economic policies, e.g., investment in public education and infrastructure, whereas a bad dictator taxes her citizens for her own consumption. The present paper provides a theoretical model by deriving underlying determinants of dictatorial behavior. We assume that the engine of economic growth is private investment. It can increase the productivity of individuals who invest, as well as the aggregate technological level. A good dictator encourages this investment in order to tax more. However, the cost of this encouragement is that the ensuing higher growth rate will induce earlier democratization. In this paper we will illustrate the risk of choosing a growth-enhancing policy, while leading to additional tax revenues in the short-run will also increase the likelihood of a revolution resulting in the eventual overthrow of the dictator. Furthermore, we will find that the higher the return from private investments the less likely the dictator will be a good one. Contrary to McGuire and Olson (J Econ Lit 34:72–96, 1996) we find that a long life-time does not always induce positive incentives among dictators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. (2000) Why did the West extend the franchise? democracy, inequality and growth in historical perspective. Q J Econ 115(4): 1167–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. (2001) A theory of political transitions. Am Econ Rev 91(4): 938–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A., Verdier T. (2004a) Kleptocracy and divide-and-rule: a model of personal rule. J Eur Econ Assoc 2(2/3): 162–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. Institutions as the fundamental cause of long run growth. NBER Working Paper No: w10481 (2004b)

  • Aghion P., Howitt P. (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60, 323–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R.J. (1997) Determinants of economic growth: a cross-country empirical study. MIT press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro R.J. (1999) Determinants of democracy. J Polit Econ 107(6): 158–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bénabou R. (1996). Inequality and growth. In: Bernanke Ben S., Rotemberg Julio J. (eds.) NBER macroeconomics annual 1996. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 11–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Bénabou R. (2002) Tax and education policy in a heterogeneous-agent economy: what levels of redistribution maximize growth and efficiency. Econometrica 70(2): 481–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix C., Stokes S.C. (2003) Endogenous democratization. World Politics 53(4): 517–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita B., Smith A., Siverson R., Morrow J. (2003) The logic of political survival. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins S.M., Bosworth B.P. (1996) Economic growth in east Asia: accumulation versus assimilation. Brookings Pap Econ Act 2, 135–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier P. (2001) Implications of ethnic diversity. Econ Policy 32, 127–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox G.W. (1997) Making votes count. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W., Levine R. (1997) Africa’s growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. Q J Econ 112, 1203–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E.L., Porta R.L., Lopez-de-Silnes F., Shleifer A. (2004) Do institutions cause growth. J Econ Growth 9(3): 271–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman G., Helpman E. (1991) Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Rev Econ Stud 58, 43–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington S.P. (1991) The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. Univ. Oklahoma press, Norman

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad K.A. (2002) Investment in the absence of property rights: the role of incumbency advantages. Eur Econ Rev 46(8): 1521–1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzman C., Werun R., Burkhart R.E. (2002) Democracy’s effect on economic growth: a pooled time-series analysis, 1951–1980. Stud Comp Int Dev 37(1): 3–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont J.-J., Qian Y. (1999) The dynamics of reform and development in China: a political economy perspective. Eur Econ Rev Pap Proc. 43, 1085–1094

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee W. (2003) Is democracy more expropriative than dictatorship? Tocquevillian wisdom revisited. J Dev Econ 71(1): 155–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R. (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22(1): 3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire M.C., Olson M. (1996) The economics of autocracy and majority rule. J Econ Lit 34, 72–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R., Phelps E. (1966) Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 51(2): 69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson T., Tabellini G. (1994) Is inequality harmful for growth. Am Econ Rev 84(3): 149–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson T., Tabellini G. (2000) Political economics: explaining economic policy. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson T., Tabellini G. (2003) The economic effects of constitutions: what do the data say. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer P. (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 89(5): 71–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross L.M. (2001) Does oil hinder democracy. World Polit 53, 325–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer D., Stephens E.H., Stephens J.D. (1992) Capitalist development and democracy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah R.K. (1991) Fallibility in human organizations and political systems. J Econ Perspect 5, 67–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J.A. (1947) Capitalism, socialism and democracy, 2nd Edn. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle K.A., Weingast B.R. (1995) Positive theories of congressional institutions. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Therborn G. (1977) The rule of capital and the rise of democracy. New Left Rev 103(1): 3–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornell A., Lane P.R. (1999) The voracity effect. Am Econ Rev 89(1): 22–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe R. (1998) The political economy of dictatorship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zak P.J., Feng Y. (2003) A dynamic theory of the transition to democracy. J Econ Behav & Organ 52, 1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Shen.

Additional information

I wish to thank Monika Merz, who carefully read the earlier version of this paper and provided many valuable suggestions. I also would like to thank the editor, the anonymous referee, Uwe Sunde, Philipp Kircher and participants at the 4th international annual conference of JEPA for helpful comments. I am grateful to Stephan Heim for his assistance. All possible errors are, of course, mine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shen, L. When will a Dictator be Good?. Economic Theory 31, 343–366 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-006-0110-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-006-0110-x

Keywords

JEL Classification Numbers

Navigation