Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lock-in and path dependence: an evolutionary approach to eco-innovations

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article presents an overview of the evolutionary approach to eco-innovations with particular emphasis on the role of lock-in and path dependence. In doing so, it focuses on the processes of radical change and the transition of technological systems that require the co-evolution of technology, firms, institutions and the society as a whole. Starting from clarifying the different notions of eco-innovations used in the literature, the article discusses the issues of lock-in and path dependence, by investigating the technological, organizational, institutional and social processes that strengthen as well as weaken path dependence. To this aim, it draws upon the evolutionary literature and discusses the relevance of path dependence and lock-in processes to understand the development of eco-innovations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Table 1 in appendix, which shows examples of the definitions used by evolutionary scholars.

References

  • Abrahamson E (1991) Managerial fads and fashions: the diffusion and rejection of innovations. Acad Manag Rev 16:586–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson E, Rosenkopf L (1997) Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: a computer simulation. Organ Sci 8(3):289–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkemade F, Frenken K et al (2009) A complex systems methodology to transition management. J Evol Econ 19(4):527–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events’. Econ J 99:116–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres R (1991) Evolutionary economics and environmental imperatives. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 2(2):255–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker MC, Lazaric N et al (2005) Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Ind Corp Chang 14(5):775–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Bento N (2010) Is carbon lock-in blocking investments in the hydrogen economy? a survey of actors’ strategies. Energy Policy 38(11):7189–7199

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J Polit Econ 100(5):992–1026

    Google Scholar 

  • Brem A, Voigt K-I (2009) Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management—insights from the German software industry. Technovation 29(5):351–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouillat E (2009) Recycling and extending product-life: an evolutionary modelling. J Evol Econ 19(3):437–461. doi:10.1007/s00191-008-0116-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier SB, Cohen MA (2003) Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. J Environ Econ Manag 45(2):278–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Caniëls MCJ, Romijn HA (2008) Strategic niche management: towards a policy tool for sustainable development. Tech Anal Strat Manag 20(2):245–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantono S, Silverberg G (2009) A percolation model of eco-innovation diffusion: the relationship between diffusion, learning economies and subsidies. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(4):487–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley S (2011) Historical analysis of U.S. Electricity markets: reassessing carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 39(2):720–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo-Hermosilla J, del Río P et al (2010) Diversity of eco-innovations: reflections from selected case studies. J Clean Prod 18(10–11):1073–1083

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadha A (2011) Overcoming competence lock-in for the development of radical eco-innovations: the case of biopolymer technology. Ind Innov 18(3):335–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C (2001) Design for the environment: a quality-based model for green product development. Manag Sci 47(2):250–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi H, Park S et al (2011) Government-driven knowledge networks as precursors to emerging sectors: a case of the hydrogen energy sector in Korea. Ind Corp Chang 20(3):751–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen C (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark RA, Goldsmith RE (2006) Interpersonal influence and consumer innovativeness. Int J Consum Stud 30(1):34–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke SF, Roome NJ (1995) Managing for environmentally sensitive technology: networks for collaboration and learning. Tech Anal Strat Manag 7(2):191–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Coad A, de Haan P et al (2009) Consumer support for environmental policies: an application to purchases of green cars. Ecol Econ 68(7):2078–2086

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortazar G, Schwartz ES et al (1998) Evaluating environmental investments: a real options approach. Manag Sci 44(8):1059–1070

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini V, Crespi F (2013) Public policies for a sustainable energy sector: regulation, diversity and fostering of innovation. J Evol Econ 23(2):401–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini V, Mazzanti M (2012) On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? the impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Res Policy 41(1):132–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan R, Gunby P (1996) Sprayed to death: path dependence, lock-in and pest control strategies. Econ J 106(436):521–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan R, Hulten S (1996) Escaping lock-in: the case of the electric vehicle. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 53:61–79

    Google Scholar 

  • David PA (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Am Econ Rev 75(2):332–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies A, Brady T (2000) Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions. Res Policy 29(7–8):931–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340

    Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi V (2012) Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Res Policy 41(3):614–623

    Google Scholar 

  • del Brı́o JÁ, Junquera B (2002) Managerial environmental awareness and cooperation with public governments in Spanish industrial companies. Technovation 22(7):445–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hond F, Groenewegen P (1996) Environmental technology foresight: new horizons for technology management. Tech Anal Strat Manag 8(1):33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers P (2002) Industrial ecology and the rediscovery of inter‐firm recycling linkages: historical evidence and policy implications. Ind Corp Chang 11(5):1031–1057. doi:10.1093/icc/11.5.1031

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijk M, Kemp R et al. (2011) Incorporating social context and co-evolution in an innovation diffusion model—with an application to cleaner vehicles. J Evol Econ: 1–35

  • Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res Policy 11(3):147–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G, Teece D et al (1992) Toward a Theory of Corporate Coherence: Some Preliminary Remarks. In: Dosi G, Giannetti R, Toninelli PA (eds) Technology and Enterprise in a Historical Perspective. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 185–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Egyedi T, Spirco J (2011) Standards in transitions: catalyzing infrastructure change. Futur 43(9):947–960

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011) Environmental technology action plan (EcoAP), COM/2011/0899 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0899:FIN:EN:PDF

  • Faber A, Frenken K (2009) Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: towards an evolutionary environmental economics. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(4):462–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Farla J, Alkemade F et al (2010) Analysis of barriers in the transition toward sustainable mobility in the Netherlands. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77(8):1260–1269

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell J, Saloner G (1985) Standardization, compatibility and innovation. Rand J Econ 16:70–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster C, McMeekin A et al (2012) The entanglement of consumer expectations and (eco) innovation sequences: the case of orange juice. Tech Anal Strat Manag 24(4):391–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxon (2002) Technological and institutional ‘lock-in’ as a barrier to sustainable innovation. ICCEPT Working Paper

  • Foxon TJ (2011) A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecol Econ 70(12):2258–2267

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxon T, Pearson P (2008) Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. J Clean Prod 16(1, Supplement 1):S148–S161

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C (1992) The Economics of Hope: Essays on Technical Change, Economics Growth and the Environment. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C (1994) The greening of technology. Futur 26(10):1019–1022

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee S, McMeekin A (2011) Eco-innovation systems and problem sequences: the contrasting cases of US and Brazilian biofuels. Ind Innov 18(3):301–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldermann J, Schollenberger H et al (2007) An integrated scenario analysis for the metal coating sector in Europe. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 74(8):1482–1507

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard D, Lave LB (2005) Implementing technology-forcing policies: the 1970 clean Air Act amendments and the introduction of advanced automotive emissions controls in the united states. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 72(7):761–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs D, Deutz P, Proctor A (2005) Industrial ecology and eco‐industrial development: a potential paradigm for local and regional development? Reg Stud 39(2):171–183. doi:10.1080/003434005200059959

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin T N, Kennelly JJ, Krause TS (1995) Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and research. Acad Manag Rev 20(4):874–907

  • Goldstein D (2002) Theoretical perspectives on strategic environmental management. J Evol Econ 12(5):495–524. doi:10.1007/s00191-002-0128-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Gossart C (2005) Routines and the sustainable lock-out of Moroccan oil refineries. Technovation 25(12):1468–1475

    Google Scholar 

  • Gossart C (2008) Routines and the environment: bridging the gaps. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 75(3):416–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizational Ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen OE, Sondergard B et al (2002) Environmental innovations in small and medium sized enterprises. Tech Anal Strat Manag 14(1):37–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert MP, Negro SO (2009) Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(4):584–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Adm Sci Q 35:9–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hischier R, Reichart I (2003) The problem of an adequate functional unit: a case study of a printed newspaper, an internet newspaper and a TV broadcast. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(4):201–208. doi:10.1007/bf02978472

    Google Scholar 

  • Horbach J (2008) Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Res Policy 37(1):163–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Islas J (1997) Getting round the lock-in in electricity generating systems: the example of the Gas turbine. Res Policy 26:49–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson S, Bergek A (2004) Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Ind Corp Chang 13(5):815–849

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen MA, Jager W (2002) Stimulating diffusion of green products. J Evol Econ 12(3):283–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammerer D (2009) The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation: Empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany. Ecol Econ 68(8–9):2285–2295

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition and compatibility. Am Econ Rev 75:424–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz ML, Shapiro C (1986) Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. J Polit Econ 94:822–841

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) System competition and network effects. J Econ Perspect 8:93–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R (1997) Environmental Policy and Technical Change: A Comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instruments. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R (2007) Integrating environmental and innovation policies. In: Parto S, Herbert-Copley B (eds) Industrial innovation and environmental regulation. United Nations University Press, Paris, pp 258–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R (2010) Eco-innovation: definition, measurement and open research issues. Econ Polit 3:397–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Oltra V (2011) Research insights and challenges on eco-innovation dynamics. Ind Innov 18(3):249–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Pontoglio S (2011) The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments — a typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecol Econ 72:28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Soete L (1992) The greening of technological progress: an evolutionary perspective. Futur 24(5):437–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Schot J, Hoogma R (1998) Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technol Anal Strat Manag 10(2):175–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesidou E, Demirel P (2012) On the drivers of eco-innovations: empirical evidence from the UK. Res Policy 41(5):862–870. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivimaa P, Mickwitz P (2006) The challenge of greening technologies—environmental policy integration in Finnish technology policies. Res Policy 35(5):729–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Klewitz J, Hansen EG (2013) Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. J Clean Prod

  • Knot JMC, van den Ende JCM et al (2001) Flexibility strategies for sustainable technology development. Technovation 21(6):335–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon T-H (2012) Strategic niche management of alternative fuel vehicles: a system dynamics model of the policy effect. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 79(9):1672–1680

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert AJD, Boons FA (2002) Eco-industrial parks: stimulating sustainable development in mixed industrial parks. Technovation 22(8):471–484. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00040-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw JO, Mody A (1996) Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Res Policy 25(4):549–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JJ, Gemba K et al (2006) Analyzing the innovation process for environmental performance improvement. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 73(3):290–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strateg Manag J 13:111–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annu Rev Sociol 14:319–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebovitz SJ, Margolis S (1995) Path dependence, lock-in and history. J Law Econ Org 11(1):205–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopolito A, Morone P et al (2011) Innovation niches and socio-technical transition: a case study of bio-refinery production. Futur 43(1):27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Los B, Verspagen B (2009) Localized innovation, localized diffusion and the environment: an analysis of reductions of CO2 emissions by passenger cars. J Evol Econ 19(4):507–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B (ed) (1992) National Systems of Innovation. Pinters Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba F (2005) Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Econ Innov New Technol 14(1–2):63–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Maréchal K (2010) Not irrational but habitual: the importance of “behavioural lock-in” in energy consumption. Ecol Econ 69(5):1104–1114

    Google Scholar 

  • Nameroff TJ, Garant RJ et al (2004) Adoption of green chemistry: an analysis based on US patents. Res Policy 33(6–7):959–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR (1993) National Systems of Innovation: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR (2005) Technology. Harvard University Press, Institutions and Economic Growth

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Sampat BN (2001) Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. J Econ Behav Organ 44(1):31–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Noailly J (2008) Coevolution of economic and ecological systems. J Evol Econ 18(1):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Noci G, Verganti R (1999) Managing ‘green’ product innovation in small firms. R&D Manag 29(1):3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor M (1993) Entropic irreversibility and uncontrolled technological change in economy and environment. J Evol Econ 3(4):285–315

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2000) Knowledge management in the Learning Society. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltra V, Saint Jean M (2005) The dynamics of environmental innovations: three stylised trajectories of clean technology. Econ Innov New Technol 14(3):189–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltra V, Saint Jean M (2009) Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: an application to the french automotive industry. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(4):567–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, Siegel DS (2005) The economics of corporate social responsibility: an overview of the special issue. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 16(3):309–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson P (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am Polit Sci Rev 94(2):251

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeld K-M, Rennings K et al (2007) Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: an empirical analysis. Ecol Econ 61(1):91–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennings K (2000) Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol Econ 32(2):319–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennings K, Markewitz P et al (2013) How clean is clean? incremental versus radical technological change in coal-fired power plants. J Evol Econ 23(2):331–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehrich G (2004) Consumer innovativeness. Concepts and measurements. J Bus Res 57:671–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandén BA, Hillman KM (2011) A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden. Res Policy 40(3):403–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Santolaria M, Oliver-Solà J et al (2011) Eco-design in innovation driven companies: perception, predictions and the main drivers of integration. The Spanish example. J Clean Prod 19(12):1315–1323

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J (1995) Manufacturing strategy and environmental consciousness. Technovation 15(2):79–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartorius C (2006) Second-order sustainability—conditions for the development of sustainable innovations in a dynamic environment. Ecol Econ 58(2):268–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Schot J, Geels F (2007) Niches in evolutionary theories of technical change. J Evol Econ 17(5):605–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Schot J, Geels FW (2008) Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Tech Anal Strat Manag 20(5):537–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Henriques I (2005) Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strateg Manag J 26(2):159–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Vredenburg H (1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg Manag J 19:729–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (1995) Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 16:183–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair-Desgagné B, Soubeyran A (2000) A Theory of Routines as Mindsavers, CIRANO Working Papers - Scientific Series. CIRANO, Montréal

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Raven R (2012) What is protective space? reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Res Policy 41(6):1025–1036

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Kern F et al (2014) Spaces for sustainable innovation: solar photovoltaic electricity in the UK. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 81:115–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MR, Rubin ES et al (2005) Control of SO2 emissions from power plants: a case of induced technological innovation in the U.S. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 72(6):697–718

    Google Scholar 

  • Technopolis (2008) SYSTEMATIC Eco-innovation Report, Final report for Sectoral innovation watch Technopolis Group

  • Triguero A, Moreno-Mondéjar L et al (2013) Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecol Econ 92:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging. Strateg Manag J 21(10–11):1147–1161

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Adm Sci Q 31:439–465

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Bergh J (2007) Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics. J Evol Econ 17(5):521–549. doi:10.1007/s00191-006-0054-0

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Heuvel STA, van den Bergh JCJM (2009) Multilevel assessment of diversity, innovation and selection in the solar photovoltaic industry. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 20(1):50–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vooren A, Alkemade F et al (2012) Effective public resource allocation to escape lock-in: the case of infrastructure-dependent vehicle technologies. Environ Innov Societal Trans 2:98–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheul H, Vergragt PJ (1995) Social experiments in the development of environmental technology: a bottom-up perspective. Tech Anal Strat Manag 7(3):315–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Veugelers R (2012) Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating? Res Policy 41(10):1770–1778

    Google Scholar 

  • Vona F, Patriarca F (2011) Income inequality and the development of environmental technologies. Ecol Econ 70(11):2201–2213

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M (2008) Empirical influence of environmental management on innovation: evidence from Europe. Ecol Econ 66(2–3):392–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M, Llerena P (2011) Eco-innovation through integration, regulation and cooperation: comparative insights from case studies in three manufacturing sectors. Ind Innov 18(8):747–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh PR (2012) Innovation nirvana or innovation wasteland? identifying commercialization strategies for small and medium renewable energy enterprises. Technovation 32(1):32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman ML (1998) The Noah’s ark problem. Econometrica 66:1279–1298

    Google Scholar 

  • Windrum P, Ciarli T et al (2009) Consumer heterogeneity and the development of environmentally friendly technologies. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(4):533–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth S, Markard J (2011) Context matters: how existing sectors and competing technologies affect the prospects of the swiss Bio-SNG innovation system. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78(4):635–649

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt U (1997) ‘Lock-in’ vs. ‘critical masses’—industrial change under network externalities. Int J Ind Organ 15:753–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Woersdorfer JS, Kaus W (2011) Will nonowners follow pioneer consumers in the adoption of solar thermal systems? Empirical evidence for northwestern Germany. Ecol Econ 70(12):2282–2291

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeppini P, van den Bergh JCJM (2011) Competing recombinant technologies for environmental innovation: extending Arthur’s model of lock-in. Ind Innov 18(3):317–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler A, Seijas Nogareda J (2009) Environmental management systems and technological environmental innovations: exploring the causal relationship. Res Policy 38(5):885–893

    Google Scholar 

  • Zutshi A, Sohal A (2004) A study of the environmental management system (EMS) adoption process within Australasian organisations—2 role of stakeholders. Technovation 24(5):371–386

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut Mines-Télécom/Télécom École de Management, 9 rue Charles Fourier, 91011, Évry, France

    Grazia Cecere, Cédric Gossart & Muge Ozman

  2. CRIOS, Bocconi University, Via Roentgen 1, 20136, Milan, Italy

    Nicoletta Corrocher

  3. RITM, Université Paris Sud, RITM 54 Boulevard Desgranges, 92330, Sceaux, France

    Grazia Cecere

Authors
  1. Grazia Cecere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicoletta Corrocher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cédric Gossart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muge Ozman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicoletta Corrocher.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 Definitions of eco-innovation
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cecere, G., Corrocher, N., Gossart, C. et al. Lock-in and path dependence: an evolutionary approach to eco-innovations. J Evol Econ 24, 1037–1065 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-014-0381-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-014-0381-5

Keywords

JEL Codes

Search

Navigation