Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ultrasonic assisted dry grinding of 42CrMo4

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, many cooling lubricants are classified as health hazards, while their end-of-life treatment poses numerous ecological threats. Dry machining is a solution for greener production and also is a favorable process from an economical point of view. However, compared to other machining processes, conventional grinding has a low material removal rate and involves high specific energy. A major part of the specific energy in grinding is changed to heat that makes harmful effect on surface quality. Therefore, in conventional dry grinding, as there are no cutting fluids to transfer the heat from the contact zone, the temperature of workpiece surface and grinding wheel surface will be increased resulted to thermal damage and poor surface integrity, increasing of wheel wear and inefficient grinding compared to conventional grinding. To make a step forward to pure dry grinding and to eliminate the negative environmental impact of the cutting fluids, a new technique called ultrasonic assisted dry grinding has been used. The advantages of ultrasonic assisted grinding were proved mostly for the brittle material. Our investigations show the improvement on the surface roughness, considerable reduction of the normal grinding force, and thermal damage in case of using ultrasonic assisted dry grinding compared to conventional dry grinding for a soft material, 42CrMo4. A decrease of up to 60% of normal grinding forces has been achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell DD et al (1999) Modeling of the environmental effect of cutting fluid. Tribol Trans 42(1):168–173 doi:10.1080/10402009908982204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heiler R (2005) Dry machining of internal screw threads. Werkstatt Betrieb 138(10):54–56

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tawakoli T, Rabiey M (2007) Dry grinding by special conditioning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(3–4):419–424 (June)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malshe AP, Arumugam PU, Batzer SA (2006) Dry machining of aluminumsilicon alloy using polished CVD diamond-coated cutting tools inserts. Surf Coat Tech 200(11):3399–3403 doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.08.127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Voll M Modelle zur thermischen Optimierung von Trockenschleifprozessen, Dissertation an der Technischen Universität Chemnitz (eingereicht 06.03.2000)

  6. Heinzel C Methoden zur Untersuchung und Optimierung der Kühlschmierung beim Schleifen, Dissertation Universität Bremen, 2003

  7. T. Tawakoli and M. Rabiey, Trockenschleifen, Grenzen und Möglichkeiten, 6. Seminar ,,Moderne Schleiftechnologie und Feinstbearbeitung“in Stuttgart, Hrsg. T. Tawakoli, 17.05.2006

  8. Tawakoli T, Rabiey M An Innovative Concept for Dry grinding with Resin and Vitrified Bond CBN Wheel, International Grinding Conference ISSAT 2007/ISME

  9. Goldman R (1962) Ultrasonic technology. Reinhold, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jana JK, Satyanarayana A (1973) Production of fine diameter holes on ultrasonic drilling marching. J Inst Eng Electron (India), Part MC: Mechanical Engineering Division 54(1):36–40

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang LB, Wang LJ, Liu XY, Zhao HW, Wang X, Luo HY (2001) Mechanical model for predicting thrust and torque in vibration drilling fibre-reinforced composite materials. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:641–657 doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(00)00105-X

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jin M, Murakawa M (2001) Development of a practical ultrasonic vibration cutting tool system. J Mater Process Technol 113:342–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Azarhoushang B, Akbari J (2007) Ultrasonic-assisted drilling of Inconel 738-LC. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(7–8):1027–1033 June

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Prabhakar PD, Ferreira PM, Haselkorn M (1992) An experimental investigation of material removal rate in rotary ultrasonic machining. Trans North Am Manuf Res Inst SME 20:211–218

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mult HC, Spur G, Holl SE (1996) Ultrasonic assisted grinding of ceramics. J Mater Process Technol 62:287–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Uhlmann E (1998) Surface formation in creep feed grinding of advanced ceramics with and without ultrasonic assistance. Annals of CIRP, Vol.47/1/1998

  17. Tawakoli T, Westkaemper E, Rasifard A (2007) Ultrasonic assisted dressing of vitrified CBN grinding wheel. 40th CIRP International Seminar on manufacturing Systems, Liverpool, UK

  18. Sutter G, Molinari A (2005) Analysis of the cutting force components and friction in high speed machining. J Manuf Sci Eng 127:245–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sutter G, Ranc N (2007) Temperature fields in a chip during high-speed orthogonal cutting—an experimental investigation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:1507–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Babitsky VI, Mitrofanov AV, Silberschmidt VV (2004) Ultrasonically assisted turning of aviation materials: simulations and experimental study. Ultrasonics 42:81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zeppenfeld C (2005) Schnellhunschleifen von-Titanaluminiden. Dissertation RWTH, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahman Azarhoushang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tawakoli, T., Azarhoushang, B. & Rabiey, M. Ultrasonic assisted dry grinding of 42CrMo4. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42, 883–891 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1646-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1646-7

Keywords

Navigation