Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting quadriceps strength recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autografts in athletes

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Patients typically return to sports activities 6–12 months after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and quadriceps strength has been used as one of the criteria to return to sports activities. The purpose of this study is to identify the factors that affect quadriceps strength recovery after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft 6 months after surgery.

Methods

Isokinetic quadriceps strength at 60°/s was measured preoperatively and 6 months after surgery in 193 athletes who underwent ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft. The quadriceps strength index was calculated by normalizing the peak torque of the involved leg with the uninvolved leg. The subjects were divided into two groups according to the quadriceps strength index 6 months after surgery: at least 85 % (n = 84) or less than 85 % (n = 109). Multivariate logistic regression analysis and a receiver operating curve analysis were performed.

Results

The preoperative quadriceps strength index [odds ratio (OR) 1.02; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.03], age (OR 0.92; 95 % CI 0.86–0.98), sex (OR 2.45; 95 % CI 1.19–5.18), and knee pain (OR 0.17; 95 % CI 0.04–0.52) were independently associated with quadriceps strength recovery. The cut-off value of the preoperative quadriceps strength index was 70.2 % to obtain at least 85 % quadriceps strength index 6 months after surgery.

Conclusion

To achieve sufficient quadriceps strength recovery at the timing of return to sports activities following ACL reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft, preoperative quadriceps strength, age, sex, and knee pain should be considered.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACL:

Anterior cruciate ligament

ROC:

Receiver operating curve

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

BPTB:

Bone–patellar-tendon–bone

SB:

Single-bundle

DB:

Double-bundle

AMB:

Anteromedial bundle

PMB:

Posterolateral bundle

GR group:

Good quadriceps strength recovery group

PR group:

Poor quadriceps strength recovery group

AUC:

Area under the curve

References

  1. Akobeng AK (2007) Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr 96(5):644–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA (2011) Return to the preinjury level of competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: two-thirds of patients have not returned by 12 months after surgery. Am J Sports Med 39(3):538–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Delay BS, Smolinski RJ, Wind WM, Bowman DS (2001) Current practices and opinions in ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation: results of a survey of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. Am J Knee Surg 14(2):85–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Jong SN, van Caspel DR, van Haeff MJ, Saris DB (2007) Functional assessment and muscle strength before and after reconstruction of chronic anterior cruciate ligament lesions. Arthroscopy 23(1):21–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eitzen I, Holm I, Risberg MA (2009) Preoperative quadriceps strength is a significant predictor of knee function two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med 43(5):371–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gobbi A, Domzalski M, Pascual J (2004) Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in male and female athletes using the patellar tendon and hamstring autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12(6):534–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Iriuchishima T, Shirakura K, Horaguchi T, Wada N, Sohmiya M, Tazawa M, Fu FH (2012) Age as a predictor of residual muscle weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(1):173–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keays SL, Bullock-Saxton J, Keays AC, Newcombe P (2001) Muscle strength and function before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendonosus and gracilis. Knee 8(3):229–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kobayashi A, Higuchi H, Terauchi M, Kobayashi F, Kimura M, Takagishi K (2004) Muscle performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop 28(1):48–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuroda R, Matsushita T (2011) Anatomic double-bundle anterior crucial ligament reconstruction with G-ST. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 4(2):57–64

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Laxdal G, Sernert N, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J, Kartus JT (2007) A prospective comparison of bone–patellar tendon–bone and hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in male patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(2):115–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lentz TA, Tillman SM, Indelicato PA, Moser MW, George SZ, Chmielewski TL (2009) Factors associated with function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Health 1(1):47–53

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Majewski M, Susanne H, Klaus S (2006) Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: a 10-year study. Knee 13(3):184–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Myer GD, Paterno MV, Ford KR, Quatman CE, Hewett TE (2006) Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: criteria-based progression through the return-to-sport phase. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36(6):385–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Natri A, Järvinen M, Latvala K, Kannus P (1996) Isokinetic muscle performance after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Long-term results and outcome predicting factors after primary surgery and late-phase reconstruction. Int J Sports Med 17(3):223–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Petschnig R, Baron R, Albrecht M (1998) The relationship between isokinetic quadriceps strength test and hop tests for distance and one-legged vertical jump test following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28(1):23–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmitt LC, Paterno MV, Ford KR, Myer GD, Hewett TE (2015) Strength asymmetry and landing mechanics at return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc 47(7):1426–1434

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Shah VM, Andrews JR, Fleisig GS, McMichael CS, Lemak LJ (2010) Return to play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in National Football League athletes. Am J Sports Med 38(11):2233–2239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shelbourne KD, Johnson BC (2004) Effects of patellar tendon width and preoperative quadriceps strength on strength return after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with ipsilateral bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft. Am J Sports Med 32(6):1474–1478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Svensson M, Sernert N, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J, Kartus JT (2006) A prospective comparison of bone–patellar tendon–bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in female patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(3):278–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  22. van Grinsven S, van Cingel RE, Holla CJ, van Loon CJ (2010) Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(8):1128–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xergia SA, Pappas E, Georgoulis AD (2015) Association of the single-limb hop test with isokinetic, kinematic, and kinetic asymmetries in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Health 7(3):217–223

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yagi M, Kuroda R, Nagamune K, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2007) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:100–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Youden WJ (1950) Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3(1):32–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zantop T, Herbort M, Raschke MJ, Fu FH, Petersen W (2007) The role of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior tibial translation and internal rotation. Am J Sports Med 35(2):223–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zelle BA, Brucker PU, Feng MT, Fu FH (2006) Anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Med 36(2):99–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zwolski C, Schmitt LC, Quatman-Yates C, Thomas S, Hewett TE, Paterno MV (2015) The influence of quadriceps strength asymmetry on patient-reported function at time of return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43(9):2242–2249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of Kobe University Hospital for supporting the authors.

Authors’ contribution

Y. U was involved in the conception and design of the study, the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data, and writing the article. T. Matsushita was involved in the conception and design of the study, development of the research, and writing the article. D. A, Y. Shibata, and R. O were involved in the conception and design of the study. A. K, K. Takiguchi, Y. Shibata, and K. O were involved in the acquisition of the data. All of the authors were involved in the critical revisions of the article for its important intellectual content, and they all approved the final version of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takehiko Matsushita.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The all authors declare that they have no conflict of interest associated with this study.

Funding

None.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ueda, Y., Matsushita, T., Araki, D. et al. Factors affecting quadriceps strength recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autografts in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 3213–3219 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4296-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4296-6

Keywords

Navigation