Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reliability of the dial test using a handheld inclinometer

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the intra-tester and inter-tester reliability of the dial test using a handheld digital inclinometer. Additionally, we examined the responsiveness of the test, and side-to-side differences for meaningful comparison.

Materials/methods

Twenty-four healthy subjects (22.5 ± 2.8 years) participated in the study. The dial test was performed on both knees at 30° and 90° of knee flexion with the subject supine. While maintaining a neutral position of the ankle, an inclinometer was positioned parallel to the medial border of the foot to quantify external rotation of the tibia. Two examiners performed the dial test in a blinded manner. The minimal detectable change across repeated measures and side-to-side difference was calculated.

Results

Intra-tester reliability for examiner 1 (E1) was 0.83 at 30° knee flexion and 0.89 at 90° knee flexion. Reliability values for examiner 2 (E2) were 0.86 at 30° and 0.87 at 90° knee flexion. Inter-tester reliability was 0.74 at 30° and 0.83 at 90°. The minimal detectable change (MDC) for E1 at 30° was ±9.4° and ±7.4° at 90°. For E2, the MDC value was ±9.1° at 30° and ±8.3° at 90°. Ninety-five percent limits of agreement for side-to-side difference was 16.1° and 11.3° ° for E1 at 30° and 90° and for E2 13.9° at 30° and 14.1° at 90°.

Conclusions

This instrumented dial test using a handheld digital inclinometer to measure external rotation can be performed with acceptable reliability in the clinical setting. A difference of 10° between two measurements on the same knee suggests that a meaningful change has occurred. For right to left comparison, differences greater than 15° suggest clinical significance.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bae JH, Choi IC, Suh SW, Lim HC, Bae TS, Nha KW, Wang JH (2008) Evaluation of the reliability of the dial test for posterolateral rotatory instability: a cadaveric study using an isotonic rotation machine. Arthroscopy 24:593–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bland JM, Altman DG (1990) A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med 20:337–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bleday RM, Fanelli GC, Giannotti BF, Edson CJ, Barrett TA (1998) Instrumented measurement of the posterolateral corner. Arthroscopy 14:489–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper DE (1991) Tests for posterolateral instability of the knee in normal subjects. Results of examination under anesthesia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:30–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gollehon DL, Torzilli PA, Warren RF (1987) The role of the posterolateral and cruciate ligaments in the stability of the human knee. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:233–242

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grood ES, Stowers SF, Noyes FR (1988) Limits of movement in the human knee. Effect of sectioning the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:88–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA (2006) Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther 86:735–743

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hughston JC, Norwood LA Jr (1980) The posterolateral drawer test and external rotational recurvatum test for posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 147:82–87

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jakob RP, Hassler H, Staeubli HU (1981) Observations on rotatory instability of the lateral compartment of the knee. Experimental studies on the functional anatomy and the pathomechanism of the true and the reversed pivot shift sign. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 191:1–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. LaPrade RF, Resig S, Wentorf F, Lewis JL (1999) The effects of grade III posterolateral knee complex injuries on anterior cruciate ligament graft force. A biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med 27:469–475

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. LaPrade RF, Wentorf F (2002) Diagnosis and treatment of posterolateral knee injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 402:110–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Loomer RL (1991) A test for knee posterolateral rotatory instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 264:235–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lorbach O, Wilmes P, Theisen D, Brockmeyer M, Maas S, Kohn D, Seil R (2009) Reliability testing of a new device to measure tibial rotation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:920–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Markolf KL, Slauterbeck JR, Armstrong KL, Shapiro MS, Finerman GA (1997) A biomechanical study of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a graft. Part II: forces in the graft compared with forces in the intact ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:381–386

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Markolf KL, Wascher DC, Finerman GA (1993) Direct in vitro measurement of forces in the cruciate ligaments. Part II: the effect of section of the posterolateral structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:387–394

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Musahl V, Bell KM, Tsai AG, Costic RS, Allaire R, Zantop T, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2007) Development of a simple device for measurement of rotational knee laxity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1009–1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Noyes FR, Stowers SF, Grood ES, Cummings J, VanGinkel LA (1993) Posterior subluxations of the medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments. An in vitro ligament sectioning study in cadaveric knees. Am J Sports Med 21:407–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP (2004) Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 57:1008–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shrout P, Fleiss J (1979) Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shultz SJ, Shimokochi Y, Nguyen A-D, Schmitz RJ, Beynnon BD, Perrin DH (2007) Measurement of varus-valgus and internal-external rotational knee laxities in vivo–Part I: assessment of measurement reliability and bilateral asymmetry. J Orthop Res 25:981–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsai AG, Musahl V, Steckel H, Bell KM, Zantop T, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2008) Rotational knee laxity: reliability of a simple measurement device in vivo. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Veltri DM, Deng XH, Torzilli PA, Warren RF, Maynard MJ (1995) The role of the cruciate and posterolateral ligaments in stability of the knee. A biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 23:436–443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Veltri DM, Warren RF (1994) Anatomy, biomechanics, and physical findings in posterolateral knee instability. Clin Sports Med 13:599–614

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Jessica Ruff, B.S. and Alessandra Tellini, M.D. for their assistance with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    David A. Krause, Bruce A. Levy, Jay P. Shah, Michael J. Stuart, John H. Hollman & Diane L. Dahm

Authors
  1. David A. Krause
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruce A. Levy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jay P. Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael J. Stuart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. John H. Hollman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Diane L. Dahm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane L. Dahm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krause, D.A., Levy, B.A., Shah, J.P. et al. Reliability of the dial test using a handheld inclinometer. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21, 1011–1016 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1873-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1873-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation