Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of the clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft with special emphasis on the timing of the reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to compare the results 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft in patients operated within 5 months after the injury (Group A) and patients operated more than 24 months after the injury (Group B).

Methods

Sixty-one patients (27 women, 34 men), with a unilateral ACL rupture, underwent reconstructive surgery using semitendinosus (ST) or semitendinosus and gracilis (ST/G) autografts. Thirty patients (Group A) were operated on within 5 months median 3 (2–5) after the injury, and 31 patients (Group B) were operated on more than 24 months median 30 (24–48) after the injury. The follow-up examination was performed after a median of 25 months (18–43) after the reconstruction.

Results

A significantly higher Lysholm score was registered in Group A 90 (58–100) than in Group B 81 (38–100), P = 0.01, as well as a higher Tegner activity level 6 (2–9) versus 5 (0–9), P = 0.01. The clinical assessments revealed no significant differences between the groups in terms of the one-leg-hop test, KT-1000 arthrometer laxity measurements, manual Lachman test and range of motion (ROM). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of meniscal and cartilage damage at the index operation.

Conclusion

At 2 years post-operatively, patients who underwent subacute reconstruction had a significantly better outcome in terms of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity level than patients who underwent delayed reconstruction. The clinical relevance of the present study is that if the patient wishes to continue doing sports on a higher level, subacute reconstruction appears beneficial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahlden M, Kartus J, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J, Sernert N (2009) Knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using either bone-patellar-tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autografts, with special emphasis on comparison over time. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1117–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE (2005) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 2. Am J Sports Med 33:1751–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE (2005) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part i. Am J Sports Med 33:1579–1602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bottoni CR, Liddell TR, Trainor TJ, Freccero DM, Lindell KK (2008) Postoperative range of motion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autograft hamstrings: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of early versus delayed reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 36:656–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brandsson S, Faxen E, Kartus J, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (2001) Is a knee brace advantageous after anterior cruciate ligament surgery? A prospective, randomised study with a two-year follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:110–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Corry IS, Webb JM, Clingeleffer AJ, Pinczewski LA (1999) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 27:444–454

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:720–726

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Dobson BE, Fithian DC, Rossman DJ, Kaufman KR (1994) Fate of the acl-injured patient. A prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med 22:632–644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gillquist J, Messner K (1999) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and the long-term incidence of gonarthrosis. Sports Med 27:143–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Howell SM, Taylor MA (1996) Brace-free rehabilitation, with early return to activity, for knees reconstructed with a double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis graft. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 78:814–825

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Höher J, Bach T, Münster A, Bouillon B, Tiling T (1997) Does the mode of data collection change results in a subjective knee score? Self-administration versus interview. Am J Sports Med 25:642–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Indelicato PA, Bittar ES (1985) A perspective of lesions associated with acl insufficiency of the knee. A review of 100 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:77–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jomha NM, Borton DC, Clingeleffer AJ, Pinczewski LA (1999) Long-term osteoarthritic changes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 358:188–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Karlsson J, Kartus J, Magnusson L, Larsson J, Brandsson S, Eriksson BI (1999) Subacute versus delayed reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in the competitive athlete. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:146–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kartus J, Stener S, Köhler K, Sernert N, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (1997) Is bracing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction necessary? A 2-year follow-up of 78 consecutive patients rehabilitated with or without a brace. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:157–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kartus J, Stener S, Lindahl S, Engstrom B, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (1997) Factors affecting donor-site morbidity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:222–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Keays SL, Newcombe PA, Bullock-Saxton JE, Bullock MI, Keays AC (2010) Factors involved in the development of osteoarthritis following anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Am J Sports 38:455–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Keene GC, Bickerstaff D, Rae PJ, Paterson RS (1993) The natural history of meniscal tears in anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med 21:672–679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Levy AS, Meier SW (2003) Approach to cartilage injury in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Orthop Clin North Am 34:149–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liden M, Sernert N, Rostgard-Christensen L, Kartus C, Ejerhed L (2008) Osteoarthritic changes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autografts: a retrospective, 7-year radiographic and clinical follow-up study. Arthroscopy 24:899–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Oiestad BE, Engebretsen L, Storheim K, Risberg MA (2009) Knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 37:1434–1443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Outerbridge RE (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43-B:752–757

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roe J, Pinczewski LA, Russell VJ, Salmon LJ, Kawamata T, Chew M (2005) A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: differences and similarities. Am J Sports Med 33:1337–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roos EM (2005) Joint injury causes knee osteoarthritis in young adults. Curr Opin Rheumatol 17:195–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Samuelsson K, Andersson D, Karlsson J (2009) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to graft type and surgical technique: an assessment of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 25:1139–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Seon JK, Song EK, Park SJ (2006) Osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a patellar tendon autograft. Int Orthop 30:94–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shelbourne KD, Nitz P (1990) Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 18:292–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith TO, Davies L, Hing CB (2009) Early versus delayed surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:304–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tegner Y, Lysholm J, Lysholm M, Gillquist J (1986) A performance test to monitor rehabilitation and evaluate anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 14:156–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. von Porat A, Roos EM, Roos H (2004) High prevalence of osteoarthritis 14 years after an anterior cruciate ligament tear in male soccer players: a study of radiographic and patient relevant outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis 63:269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wright RW, Preston E, Fleming BC et al (2008) A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: part ii: open versus closed kinetic chain exercises, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, accelerated rehabilitation, and miscellaneous topics. J Knee Surg 21:225–234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, NU-Hospital Organisation, 461 85, Trollhättan, Uddevalla, Sweden

    Martina Åhlén

  2. Department of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden

    Mattias Lidén

Authors
  1. Martina Åhlén
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mattias Lidén
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina Åhlén.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Åhlén, M., Lidén, M. A comparison of the clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft with special emphasis on the timing of the reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19, 488–494 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1312-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1312-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation