Skip to main content
Log in

A reliability-based optimization method using sequential surrogate model and Monte Carlo simulation

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a sequential surrogate model method for reliability-based optimization (SSRBO), which aims to reduce the number of the expensive black-box function calls in reliability-based optimization. The proposed method consists of three key steps. First, the initial samples are selected to construct radial basis function surrogate models for the objective and constraint functions, respectively. Second, by solving a series of special optimization problems in terms of the surrogate models, local samples are identified and added in the vicinity of the current optimal point to refine the surrogate models. Third, by solving the optimization problem with the shifted constraints, the current optimal point is obtained. Then, at the current optimal point, the Monte Carlo simulation based on the surrogate models is carried out to obtain the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of the constraints. The CDFs and target reliabilities are used to update the offsets of the constraints for the next iteration. Therefore, the original problem is decomposed to serial cheap surrogate-based deterministic problems and Monte Carlo simulations. Several examples are adopted to verify SSRBO. The results show that the number of the expensive black-box function calls is reduced exponentially without losing of precision compared to the alternative methods, which illustrates the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

X :

Vector of random variables

x :

Mean value of X

x L, x U :

Lower and upper bounds of x

U :

Vector of random variables in standard normal space

u :

Mean value of U

m :

Number of variables

p :

Number of constraint functions

ε :

Difference vector between X and x

R :

Vector of constraint reliabilities

J(·):

Objective function

g(·):

Vector of constraint functions

\( \widehat{\left(\cdotp \right)} \) :

Value of surrogate models

(·)i :

The ith component of a vector

E(·):

Expectation of a random variable

P{·}:

Probability of a random variable

CDF:

Cumulative distribution function

F ε(·):

Vectorized CDF for ε

F U(·):

Vectorized CDF for U

β i :

The ith reliability index of the constraint functions

ϕ(·):

CDF of the standard normal distribution

RBO:

Reliability-based optimization

SSRBO:

Sequential surrogate reliability-based optimization

MCS:

Monte Carlo simulation

LSF:

Limit state function

MPP:

Most probable point

RBF:

Radial basis function

AMA:

Approximate moment approach

RIA:

Reliability index approach

PMA:

Performance measure approach

SORA:

Sequential optimization and reliability assessment

SLSV:

Single loop single variable

ASORA:

Advanced sequential optimization and reliability assessment

SLA:

Single-loop approach

AHA:

Adaptive hybrid approach

AH_SLM:

Adaptive hybrid single-loop method

References

  • Bowman AW, Azzalini A (1997) Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: the kernel approach with S-PLUS illustrations. Oxford University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Breitkopf P, Coelho RF (2010) Multidisciplinary design optimization in computational mechanics. Wiley-ISTE, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawlfield JD (2000) Application of first-order (FORM) and second-order (SORM) reliability methods: analysis and interpretation of sensitivity measures related to groundwater pressure decreases and resulting ground subsidence. In: Sensitivity analysis. Wiley, Chichester, pp 317–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho TM, Lee BC (2011) Reliability-based design optimization using convex linearization and sequential optimization and reliability assessment method. Struct Saf 24:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-1143-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cizelj L, Mavko B, Riesch-Oppermann H (1994) Application of first and second order reliability methods in the safety assessment of cracked steam generator tubing. Nucl Eng Des 147:359–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(94)90218-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doan BQ, Liu G, Xu C, Chau MQ (2018) An efficient approach for reliability-based design optimization combined sequential optimization with approximate models. Int J Comput Methods 15:1–15

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Du X (2008) Unified uncertainty analysis by the first order reliability method. J Mech Des 130:1404. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2943295

    Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Chen W (2004) Sequential optimization and reliability assessment for probabilistic design. J Mech Des 126:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enevoldsen I, Sørensen JD (1994) Reliability-based optimization in structural engineering. Struct Saf 15:169–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester DAIJ, Sóbester DA, Keane AJ (2008) Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grandhi RV, Wang L (1998) Reliability-based structural optimization using improved two-point adaptive nonlinear approximations. Finite Elem Anal Des 29:35–48

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haldar A, Mahadevan S (1995) First-order and second-order reliability methods. Springer US

  • Hastie T, Robert T, Friedman J (2008) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction, 2nd edn. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado JE, Alvarez DA (2001) Neural-network-based reliability analysis: a comparative study. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:113–132

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Qiu H, Gao L et al (2017) An adaptive hybrid single-loop method for reliability-based design optimization using iterative control strategy. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56:1–16

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Koch PN, Yang RJ, Gu L (2004) Design for six sigma through robust optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26:235–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurenceau J, Sagaut P (2008) Building efficient response surfaces of aerodynamic functions with kriging and cokriging. AIAA J 46:498–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JJ, Lee BC (2005) Efficient evaluation of probabilistic constraints using an envelope function. Eng Optim 37:185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Wu T, Badiru A et al (2013) A single-loop deterministic method for reliability-based design optimization. Eng Optim 45:435–458

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Qiu H, Chen Z et al (2016) A local kriging approximation method using MPP for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 162:102–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Mourelatos ZP, Tu J (2008) A single-loop method for reliability-based design optimisation. Int J Prod Dev 5:76–92 (17)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Z, Zhou H, Li G, Hu H (2017) A hybrid sequential approximate programming method for second-order reliability-based design optimization approach. Acta Mech 228:1–14

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Qu X, Haftka RT (2004) Reliability-based design optimization using probabilistic sufficiency factor. Struct Multidiscip Optim 27:314–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regis RG, Shoemaker CA (2005) Constrained global optimization of expensive black box functions using radial basis functions. J Glob Optim 31:153–171

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ronch AD, Ghoreyshi M, Badcock KJ (2011) On the generation of flight dynamics aerodynamic tables by computational fluid dynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci 47:597–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronch AD, Panzeri M, Bari MAA et al (2017) Adaptive design of experiments for efficient and accurate estimation of aerodynamic loads. In: 6th Symposium on Collaboration in Aircraft Design (SCAD)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömberg N (2017) Reliability-based design optimization using SORM and SQP. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56:631–645

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tsompanakis Y, Lagaros ND, Papadrakakis M (2010) Structural design optimization considering uncertainties. Taylor and Francis, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (1999) A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 121:557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdebenito MA, Schuoller GI (2010) A survey on approaches for reliability-based optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42:645–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0518-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Verderaime V (1994) Illustrated structural application of universal first-order reliability method. NASA STI/Recon Tech Rep N 95:11870

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang RJ, Gu L (2004) Experience with approximate reliability-based optimization methods. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26:152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi P, Zhu Z, Gong J (2016) An approximate sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54:1367–1378

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK (2004) A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 82:241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK, Yang RJ, Gu L (2004) Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26:272–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou M, Luo Z, Yi P, Cheng G (2018) A two-phase approach based on sequential approximation for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 1–20

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors also thank Dr. Xueyu Li for the helpful work to improve the study.

Funding

The research is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. G2016KY0302) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11572134).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunlin Gong.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Shapour Azarm

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Gong, C., Gu, L. et al. A reliability-based optimization method using sequential surrogate model and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Multidisc Optim 59, 439–460 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2075-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2075-3

Keywords

Navigation