Skip to main content
Log in

On fully stressed design and p-norm measures in structural optimization

  • BRIEF NOTE
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This brief note revisits the fully stressed design schemes and p-norm measures used in stress-based structural optimization. Two simple shape optimization cases are used to remind the reader that fully stressed designs only are optimal when unimpeded by geometrical restrictions and that high values of the stress norm are needed in order to achieve satisfactory designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. In this note, we discuss the minimization of stress with a volume constraint. However, all conclusions hold for the dual problem of minimizing volume subject to stress constraint as well.

  2. For numerical stability of the DSC method, each boundary node is only allowed to move within a certain range in each design iteration.

References

  • Christiansen A N, Nobel-Jørgensen M, Aage N, Sigmund O, Bærentze JA (2014) Topology optimization using an explicit interface representation. Struct Multidisc Optim 49:387–399

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen A N, Bærentzen JA, Nobel-Jørgensen M, Aage N, Sigmund O (2015) Combined shape and topology optimization of 3d structures. Comput Graph 46:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duysinx P, Bendsøe M (1998) Topology optimization of continuum structures with local stress coinstraints. Int J Numer Math Eng 43(8):1453–1478

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Duysinx P, Sigmund O (1998) New developments in handling stress constraints in optimal material distributions. In: 7th Symposium on multidiciplinary analysis and optimization, AIAA/USAF/ NASA/ISSMO, AIAA-98-4906:1501–1509

  • ISO (2015) Biomimetics biomimetic structural optimization. ISO 18459:2015, International Organization for Standardization

  • Le C, Norato J, Bruns T, Ha C, Tortorelli D (2010) Stress-based topology optimization for continua. Struct Multidisc Optim 41:605–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian H, Christiansen A N, Tortorelli D A, Sigmund O, Aage N (2017) Combined shape and topology optimization for minimization of maximal von mises stress. Struct Multidisc Optim 55(5):1541–1557. doi:10.1007/s00158-017-1656-x

  • Meske R, Sauter J, Schnack E (2005) Nonparametric gradient-less shape optimization for real-world applications. Struct Multidisc Optim 30:201–218

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Misztal M K, Bærentzen JA (2012) Topology-adaptive interface tracking using the deformable simplicial complex. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 31(3):No. 24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen P (2000b) On optimal shapes in materials and structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 19:169–182

  • Schnack E (1979) An optimization procedure for stress concentrations by the finite element technique. Int J Numer Math Eng 14:115–124

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the research project “Sapere Aude TOpTEn” (Topology Optimization of Thermal ENergy systems) from the Danish Council for Independent Research, grant: DFF-4005-00320.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ole Sigmund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, M., Sigmund, O. On fully stressed design and p-norm measures in structural optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 56, 731–736 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1731-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1731-3

Keywords

Navigation