Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of early gastric and post-pyloric feeding in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the potential beneficial and adverse effects of early post-pyloric feeding compared with gastric feeding in critically ill adult patients with no evidence of impaired gastric emptying.

Design

Randomised controlled studies comparing gastric and post-pyloric feeding in critically ill adult patients from Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (2005 issue 3), EMBASE and MEDLINE databases (1966 to 1 October 2005) without any language restriction were included. Two reviewers reviewed the quality of the studies and performed data extraction independently.

Measurements and results

Eleven randomised controlled studies with a total of 637 critically ill adult patients were considered. The mortality (relative risk [RR] 1.01, 95% CI 0.76–1.36, p = 0.93; I 2 = 0%) and risk of aspiration or pneumonia (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.91–1.80, p = 0.15; I 2 = 0%) were not significantly different between patients treated with gastric or post-pyloric feeding. The effect of post-pyloric feeding on the risk of pneumonia or aspiration was similar when studies were stratified intothose with and those without the use of concurrent gastric decompression (RR ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.48–1.91, p = 0.89). The risk of diarrhoea and the length of intensive care unit stay (weighted mean difference in days –1.46, 95% CI –3.74 to 0.82,p = 0.21; I 2 = 24.6%) were not statistically different. The gastric feeding group had a much lower risk of experiencing feeding tube placement difficulties or blockage (0 vs 9.6%, RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04–0.44, p = 0.001; I 2 = 0%).

Conclusions

Early use of post-pyloric feeding instead of gastric feeding in critically ill adult patients with no evidence of impaired gastric emptying was not associated with significant clinical benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, Gramlich L, Dodek P, Canadian Critical Care Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee (2003) Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 27:355–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor SJ, Fettes SB, Jewkes C, Nelson RJ (1999) Propsective, randomized, controlled trial to determine the effect of early enhanced enteral nutrition on clinical outcome in mechanically ventilated patients suffering head injury. Crit Care Med 27:2525–2531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Heyland DK, Drover JW, MacDonald S, Novak F, Lam M (2001) Effect of postpyloric feeding on gastroesophageal regurgitation and pulmonary microaspiration: results of a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 29:1495–1501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heyland DK, Tougas G, King D, Cook DJ (1996) Impaired gastric emptying in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients.Intensive Care Med 22:1339–1344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marik PE, Zaloga GP (2003) Gastric versus post-pyloric feeding: a systematic review. Crit Care 7:R46–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McGuire W, McEwan P (2004) Systematic review of transpyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 89:F245–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawati R, Rubertsson S (2005) Malpositioning of fine bore feeding tube: a serious complication. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 49:58–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Metheny NA, Stewart J, Nuetzel G, Oliver D, Clouse RE (2005) Effect of feeding-tube properties on residual volume measurements in tube-fed patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 29:192–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McClave SA, Lukan JK, Stefater JA, Lowen CC, Looney SW, Matheson PJ, Gleeson K, Spain DA (2005) Poor validity of residual volumes as a marker for risk of aspiration in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 33(2):324–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Altman DG, Bland JM (2003) Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. BMJ 326:219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Esparza J, Boivin MA, Hartshorne MF, Levy H (2001) Equal aspiration rates in gastrically and transpylorically fed critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2001 27:660–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Davies AR, Froomes PR, French CJ, Bellomo R, Gutteridge GA, Nyulasi I, Walker R, Sewell RB (2002) Randomized comparison of nasojejunal and nasogastric feeding in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 30:586–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kortbeek JB, Haigh PI, Doig C (1999) Duodenal versus gastric feeding in ventilated blunt trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Trauma 46:992–996

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kearns PJ, Chin D, Mueller L, Wallace K, Jensen WA, Kirsch CM (2000) The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and success in nutrient delivery with gastric versus small intestinal feeding: a randomized clinical trial. Crit Care Med 28:1742–1746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Day L, Stotts NA, Frankfurt A, Stralovich-Romani A, Volz M, Muwaswes M, Fukuoka Y, O'Leary-Kelley C (2001) Gastric versus duodenal feeding in patients with neurological disease: a pilot study. J Neurosci Nurs 33:148–149, 155–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Neumann DA, DeLegge MH (2002) Gastric versus small-bowel tube feeding in the intensive care unit: a prospective comparison of efficacy. Crit Care Med 30:1436–1438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boivin MA, Levy H (2001) Gastric feeding with erythromycin is equivalent to transpyloric feeding in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 29:1916–1919

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Eatock FC, Chong P, Menezes N, Murray L, McKay CJ, Carter CR, Imrie CW (2005) A randomized study of early nasogastric versus nasojejunal feeding in severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 100:432–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Montecalvo MA, Steger KA, Farber HW, Smith BF, Dennis RC, Fitzpatrick GF, Pollack SD, Korsberg TZ, Birkett DH, Hirsch EF, Craven DE (1992) Nutritional outcome and pneumonia in critical care patients randomized to gastric versus jejunal tube feedings. The Critical Care Research Team. Crit Care Med 20:1377–1387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Montejo JC, Grau T, Acosta J, Ruiz-Santana S, Planas M, Garcia-De-Lorenzo A, Mesejo A, Cervera M, Sanchez-Alvarez C, Nunez-Ruiz R, Lopez-Martinez J, Nutritional and Metabolic Working Group of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units (2002) Multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind study comparing the efficacy and gastrointestinal complications of early jejunal feeding with early gastric feeding in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 30:796–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pupelis G, Selga G, Austrums E, Kaminski A (2001) Jejunal feeding, even when instituted late, improves outcomes in patients with severe pancreatitis and peritonitis. Nutrition 17:91–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Singh G, Ram RP, Khanna SK (1998) Early postoperative enteral feeding in patients with nontraumatic intestinal perforation and peritonitis. J Am Coll Surg 187:142–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoover HC Jr, Ryan JA, Anderson EJ, Fischer JE (1980) Nutritional benefits of immediate postoperative jejunal feeding of an elemental diet. Am J Surg 139:153–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith RC, Hartemink RJ, Hollinshead JW, Gillett DJ (1985) Fine bore jejunostomy feeding following major abdominal surgery: a controlled randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 72:458–461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hwang TL, Huang SL, Chen MF (1991) Early nasoduodenal feeding for the post-biliary surgical patient. J Formos Med Assoc 90:993–997

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Malhotra A, Mathur AK, Gupta S (2004) Early enteral nutrition after surgical treatment of gut perforations: a prospective randomised study. J Postgrad Med 50:102–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moore EE, Jones TN (1986) Benefits of immediate jejunostomy feeding after major abdominal trauma–a prospective, randomized study. J Trauma 26:874–881

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaur N, Gupta MK, Minocha VR (2005) Early enteral feeding by nasoenteric tubes in patients with perforation peritonitis. World J Surg 29:1023–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zapas JL, Karakozis S, Kirkpatrick JR (1998) Prophylactic jejunostomy: a reappraisal. Surgery 124:715–719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Adams GF, Guest DP, Ciraulo DL, Lewis PL, Hill RC, Barker DE (2000) Maximizing tolerance of enteral nutrition in severely injured trauma patients: a comparison of enteral feedings by means of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy. J Trauma 48:459–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Spain DA, DeWeese RC, Reynolds MA, Richardson JD (1995) Transpyloric passage of feeding tubes in patients with head injuries does not decrease complications. J Trauma 39:1100–1102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Minard G, Kudsk KA, Melton S, Patton JH, Tolley EA (2000) Early versus delayed feeding with an immune-enhancing diet in patients with severe head injuries. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 24:145–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pandey SK, Ahuja V, Joshi YK, Sharma MP (2004) A randomized trial of oral refeeding compared with jejunal tube refeeding in acute pancreatitis. Indian J Gastroenterol 23:53–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Levy B, Perrigault PF, Gawalkiewicz P, Sebire F, Escriva M, Colson P, Wahl D, Frederic M, Bollaert PE, Larcan A (1998) Gastric versus duodenal feeding and gastric tonometric measurements. Crit Care Med 26:1991–1994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Monteferrante E, Mancini G, Pedrazzoli C, Rozzi F, Ciampaglia F, Manso L, Listorto G (1999) The nasojejunal tube in early postoperative nutrition. Minerva Chir 54:551–555

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Strong RM, Condon SC, Solinger MR, Namihas BN, Ito-Wong LA, Leuty JE (1992) Equal aspiration rates from postpylorus and intragastric-placed small-bore nasoenteric feeding tubes: a randomized, prospective study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 16:59–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Davies AR, Bellomo R (2004) Establishment of enteral nutrition: prokinetic agents and small bowel feeding tubes. Curr Opin Crit Care 10:156–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bourgault AM, Heyland DK, Drover JW, Keefe L, Newman P, Day AG (2003) Prophylactic pancreatic enzymes to reduce feeding tube occlusions. Nutr Clin Pract 18:398–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Doig GS, Simpson F, Delaney A (2005) A review of the true methodological quality of nutritional support trials conducted in the critically ill: time for improvement. Anesth Analg 100:527–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Navneet Kaur for providing information from his study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Intensive Care Unit, Royal Perth Hospital, WA 6000, Perth, Australia

    Kwok M. Ho, Geoffrey J. Dobb & Steven A. R. Webb

  2. School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

    Geoffrey J. Dobb & Steven A. R. Webb

Authors
  1. Kwok M. Ho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Geoffrey J. Dobb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steven A. R. Webb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwok M. Ho.

Additional information

This study was solely funded by the Department of Intensive Care, Royal Perth Hospital. No financial support was received for this study from pharmaceutical companies or other private companies in the form of grants and awards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ho, K.M., Dobb, G.J. & Webb, S.A.R. A comparison of early gastric and post-pyloric feeding in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 32, 639–649 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0128-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0128-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation