Skip to main content
Log in

Socioeconomic status as a cause and consequence of psychosomatic symptoms from adolescence to adulthood

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Few follow-up studies have investigated psychosomatic health and socioeconomic status (SES) and associations between them at different life stages. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in psychosomatic symptoms by SES in adolescence, early adulthood and adulthood and to examine whether lower SES leads to higher levels of symptoms (social causation) or higher levels of symptoms to lower SES (health selection) or both.

Methods

All 16-year-old ninth-grade school pupils of one Finnish city completed questionnaires at school. Subjects were followed up using postal questionnaires when aged 22 and 32 years.

Results

Females reported significantly higher scores of psychosomatic symptoms than males at 16, 22 and 32 years of age. Higher rates of psychosomatic symptoms were found among females of manual class origin at 16 years. In addition, at 22 years, both females and males with only comprehensive school education and, at 32 years, those who worked in manual jobs had higher scores of symptoms. When low SES both as a cause and consequence of symptoms was investigated, the findings supported both these paths among females and more the health selection among males. In both genders, especially the path from psychosomatic symptoms in adolescence to lower education in early adulthood was strong.

Conclusions

The results highlight the need of greater consideration of psychosomatic symptoms, particularly in adolescence, in later socioeconomic outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allison PD (2001) Missing data. Sage University papers series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arbuckle JL (2003) Amos 5 user’s guide. SPSS, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arbuckle JL, Wothke W (1999) Amos 4.0 user’s guide. SmallWaters Corporation, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aro S (1981) Stress, morbidity and health-related behaviour: a five-year follow-up study among mental industry employees. Scand J Soc Med 9(Suppl 25):1–130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aro H (1989) Stress, development and psychosomatic symptoms in adolescence: a comparison of the sexes. Psychiatr Fenn 20:101–109

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aro H, Paronen O, Aro S (1987) Psychosomatic symptoms among 14- to 16-year-old Finnish adolescents. Soc Psychiatry 22:171–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aro S, Aro H, Keskimäki I (1995) Socioeconomic mobility among patients with schizophrenia or major affective disorders. A 17-year retrospective follow-up. Br J Psychiatry 166:759–767

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berntsson LT, Köhler L (2001) Long-term illness and psychosomatic complaints in children aged 2–17 years in the five Nordic countries. Eur J Public Health 11:35–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bijleveld CC, van der Kamp LJ, Mooijaart A, van der Kloot WA, van der Leeden R, van der Burg E (1998) Longitudinal data analysis. Design, models and methods. SAGE, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blane D, Harding S, Rosato M (1999) Does social mobility affect the size of the socioeconomic mortality differential?: evidence from the Office for National Statistics Longitudinal Study. J R Statist Soc A 162:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Byrne BM (1989) A primer of LISREL: basic applications and programming for confimatory factor analytic models. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Byrne BM (1998) Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  14. Central Statistical Office of Finland (1975) Classification of occupations. Central Statistical Office of Finland, Helsinki, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  15. Central Statistical Office of Finland (1989) Classification of socioeconomic groups. Central Statistical Office of Finland, Helsinki, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chandola T, Bartley M, Sacker A, Jenkinson C, Marmot M (2003) Health selection in the Whitehall II study, UK. Soc Sci Med 56:2059–2072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dohrenwend BP, Levav I, Shrout PE, Schwartz S, Naveh G, Link BG, Skodol AE, Stueve A (1992) Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders: the causation-selection issue. Science 255:946–952

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eaton WW, Muntaner C, Bovasso G, Smith C (2001) Socioeconomic status and depressive syndrome: the role of inter- and intragenerational mobility, government assistance, and work environment. J Health Soc Behav 42:277–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eriksen HR, Svendsrod R, Ursin G, Ursin H (1998) Prevalence of subjective health complaints in the Nordic European countries in 1993. Eur J Public Health 8:294–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eriksson M, Lahelma E, Rahkonen O (1992) Gender and social class differences in psychic symptoms among Finnish youth and young adults. Sos Laaketiet Aikak 29:89–95 (in Finnish with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gijsberg van Wijk CMT, Kolk AM (1997) Sex differences in physical symptoms: the contribution of symptom perception theory. Soc Sci Med 45:231–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Halldórsson M, Kunst AE, Köhler L, Mackenbach JP (2000) Socioeconomic inequalities in the health of children and adolescents. A comparative study of the five Nordic countries. Eur J Public Health 10:281–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haugland S, Wold B (2001) Subjective health complaints in adolescence-reliability and validity of survey methods. J Adolesc 24:611–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Haugland S, Wold B, Stevenson J, Aaroe LE, Woynarowska B (2001) Subjective health complaints in adolescence. A cross-national comparison of prevalence and dimensionality. Eur J Public Health 11:4–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hayduk LA (1987) Structural equation modeling with Lisrel. Essentials and advances. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria vs new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6:1–55

    Google Scholar 

  27. Huurre T, Aro H, Rahkonen O (2003) Well-being and health behaviour by parental socioeconomic status. A follow-up study of adolescents aged 16 until 32 years of age. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 38:249–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ihlebaek C, Eriksen HR, Ursin H (2002) Prevalence of subjective health complaints (SHC) in Norway. Scand J Public Health 30:20–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson JG, Cohen P, Dohrenwend BP, Link BG, Brook JS (1999) A longitudinal investigation of social causation and social selection processes involved in the association between socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders. J Abnorm Psychol 108:490–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1978) LISREL IV’s user’s guide. National Educational Resources, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1996a) LISREL 8. User’s reference guide. Scientific Software International, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1996b) PRELIS 2. User’s reference guide: a program for multivariate data screening and data summarization. A preprocessor for LISREL. Scientific Software International, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (2003) LISREL 8.54. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kelloway EK (1998) Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: a researcher’s guide. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  35. Koivusilta L, Rimpelä A, Rimpelä M (1995) Health status: does it predict choice in further education? J Epidemiol Community Health 49:131–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ladwig K-H, Marten-Mittag B, Formanek B, Dammann G (2000) Gender differences of symptom reporting and medical health care utilization in the German population. Eur J Epidemiol 16:511–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lien N, Friestad C, Klepp K-I (2001) Adolescents ‘proxy reports of parents’ socioeconomic status: how valid are they? J Epidemiol Community Health 55:731–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Loehlin J (1998) Latent variable models. An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  39. Macintyre S (1997) The Black Report and beyond: what are the issues? Soc Sci Med 44:723–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Macintyre S, Hunt K, Sweeting H (1996) Gender differences in health: are things really as simple as they seem? Soc Sci Med 42:617–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Manor O, Matthews S, Power C (2003) Health selection: the role of inter- and intra-generational mobility on social inequalities in health. Soc Sci Med 57:2217–2227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Marmot M, Ryff CD, Bumpass LL, Shipley M, Marks NF (1997) Social inequalities in health: next questions and converging evidence. Soc Sci Med 44:901–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Maruyama GM (1998) Basics of structural equation modeling. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  44. Miech RA, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Wright BRE, Silva BA (1999) Low socioeconomic status and mental disorders: a longitudinal study of social selection and causation during young adulthood. Am J Sociol 104:1096–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mirowsky J, Ross CE (1995) Sex differences in distress: real of artifact? Am Sociol Rev 60:449–468

    Google Scholar 

  46. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998) Mplus user’s guide. Statistical analysis with latent variables. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA http://www.StatModel.com

  47. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2002) Mplus Version 2.12. Addendum to the Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA http://www.StatModel.com

  48. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2003) Mplus Version 2.13. Addendum to the Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA http://www.StatModel.com

  49. Paronen O, Pasanen M, Rantanen P, Aro S (1982) Test-retest study of psychosomatic symptoms among 14- to 15-year-old schoolchildren. Sos Laaketiet Aikak 19:234–239 (in Finnish with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Piccinelli M, Simon G (1997) Gender and cross-cultural differences in somatic symptoms associated with emotional distress. Psychol Med 27:433–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Power C, Matthews S (1997) Origins of health inequalities in a national population sample. Lancet 350:1584–1589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Power C, Stansfeld SA, Matthews S, Manor O, Hope S (2002) Childhood and adulthood risk factors for socioeconomic differentials in psychological distress: evidence from the 1958 British birth cohort. Soc Sci Med 55:1989–2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Prescott CA (2004) Using the Mplus computer program to estimate models for continuous and categorical data from twins. Behav Genet 34:17–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rahkonen O, Arber S, Lahelma E (1995) Health inequalities in early adulthood: a comparison of young men and women in Britain and Finland. Soc Sci Med 41:163–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rahmqvist M, Carstensen J (1998) Trend of psychological distress in a Swedish population from 1989 to 1995. Scand J Soc Med 26:214–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rimpelä M, Rimpelä A, Pasanen M (1982) Perceived symptoms among 12- to 18-year-old Finns. Sos Laaketiet Aikak 19:219–233 (in Finnish with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sweeting H, West P (2003) Sex differences in health at ages 11, 13 and 15. Soc Sci Med 56:31–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. West P (1991) Rethinking the health selection explanation for health inequalities. Soc Sci Med 32:373–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. West P (1997) Health inequalities in the early years: is there equalisation in youth? Soc Sci Med 44:833–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. West P, Sweeting H, Speed E (2001) We really do know what you do: a comparison of reports from 11-year-olds and their parents in respect of parental economic activity and occupation. Sociology 35:539–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wool CA, Barsky AJ (1994) Do women somatize more than men? Psychosomatics 35:445–452

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Yu C-Y, Muthén B (2001) Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Technical report. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA http://www.StatModel.com

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Juho Vainio Foundation, the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation, Signe and Ane Gyllenberg’s Foundation and the Academy of Finland (80414 and 45664).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taina Huurre Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huurre, T., Rahkonen, O., Komulainen, E. et al. Socioeconomic status as a cause and consequence of psychosomatic symptoms from adolescence to adulthood. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 40, 580–587 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0930-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0930-1

Key words

Navigation