Skip to main content
Log in

Perceived coercion at admission to psychiatric hospital and engagement with follow-up

A cohort study

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Measures of perceived coercion at psychiatric hospital admission have been developed. We aimed to investigate predictors of perceived coercion in subjects admitted to psychiatric hospital in the UK, and to test the hypothesis that high perceived coercion at admission predicts poor engagement with community follow-up.

Method

A cohort of consecutively admitted subjects were interviewed at admission and before discharge, and were followed prospectively for 10 months. Service use and compliance with care were rated from case notes and by clinicians.

Results

One hundred interviews were obtained from 118 consecutive admissions (85 %). Compulsory admission was strongly associated with perceived coercion, but one-third of voluntary patients felt highly coerced, and two-thirds were not certain they were free to leave hospital. Greater age, less insight, and non-white ethnicity were associated with high perceived coercion. Perceived coercion did not predict engagement with follow-up.

Conclusions

Services recognise provision of care in the least restrictive setting as a key objective. Perceived coercion should be regarded as an important outcome measure in service evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoge SK, Lidz C, Mulvey E, Roth L, Bennett N, Siminoff L, Arnold R, Monahan J (1993) Patient, Family, and Staff Perceptions of Coercion in Mental Hospital Admission: An Exploratory Study. Behav Sci Law 11:281–293

    Google Scholar 

  2. Monahan J, Hoge S, Lidz C, Roth LH, Bennett N, Gardner W, Mulvey E (1995) Coercion and Commitment: Understanding Involuntary Hospital Admission. Int J Law Psychiatry 18(3):249–263

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gardner W, Lidz CW, Hoge SK, Monahan J, Eisenberg MM, Bennett NS, Mulvey EP, Roth LH (1999) Patients’ revisions of their beliefs about the need for hospitalization. Am J Psychiatry 156(9):1385–1391

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gardner W, Hoge SK, Bennett N, Roth L, Lidz C, Monahan J, Mulvey E (1993) Two scales for measuring patients’ perceptions of coercion during mental hospital admission. Behav Sci Law 11:307–321

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hiday V, Swartz M, Swanson J, Wagner H (1997) Patient perceptions of coercion in mental hospital admission. Int J Law Psychiatry 20(2):227–241

    Google Scholar 

  6. Commander M, Cochrane R, Sashidharan S, et al. (1999) Mental health care for Asian, black and white patients with non-affective psychoses: pathways to the psychiatric hospital, in-patient and after-care. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 34:484–491

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davies S, Thornicroft G, Leese M, Higgingbotham A, Phelan M (1996) Ethnic differences in the risk of compulsory psychiatric admission among representative cases of psychosis in London. Br Med J 312:533–537

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bhui K, Stansfeld S, Hull S, Priebe S, Mole F, Feder G (2003) Ethnic variations in pathways to and use of specialist mental health services in the UK: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 182:105–116

    Google Scholar 

  9. Browne D (1997) Black people and ‘Sectioning’. The black experience of detention under civil sections of the Mental Health Act. London, Little Rock

  10. Birchwood M, Smith J, Drury V, Healy J, Macmillan F, Slade M (1994) A self-report Insight Scale for psychosis: reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Acta Psychiatr Scand 89:62–67

    Google Scholar 

  11. Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL, et al. (1976) The Global Assessment Scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 33:766–771

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH, et al. (1998) Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: research and development. Br J Psychiatry 172:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kemp R, Hayward P, Applewhaite G, et al. (1996) Compliance therapy in psychotic patients: a randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 312:345–349

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bindman J, Johnson S, Szmukler G, Wright S, Kuipers E, Thornicroft G, Bebbington P, Leese M (2000) Continuity of care and clinical outcome: a prospective cohort study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 35:242–247

    Google Scholar 

  15. STATA Statistical Software: Release 6.0. STATA Corporation, College Station, Texas, 1999

  16. Lidz C, Hoge S, Gardner W, Bennett N, Monahan J, Mulvey E, Roth L (1995) Perceived Coercion in Mental Hospital Admission: Pressures and Process. Arch Gen Psychiatry 52:1034–1039

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wertheimer A (1993) A philosophical examination of coercion for mental health issues. Behav Sci Law 11:239–258

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers A (1993) Coercion and ‘voluntary’ admission: an examination of psychiatric patient views. Behav Sci Law 11:259–267

    Google Scholar 

  19. Poulsen HD (1999) Perceived coercion among committed, detained and voluntary patients. Int J Law Psychiatry 22(2):167–175

    Google Scholar 

  20. Swartz MS, Burns BJ, Hiday VA, George LK, et al. (1995) New Directions in Research on Involuntary Outpatient Commitment. Psychiatr Serv 46(4):381–385

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaltiala-Heino R, Laippala P, Salokangas K (1997) Impact of coercion on treatment outcome. Int J Law Psychiatry 20(3):311–322

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rain SD, Williams VF, Clark Robbins P, Monahan J, Steadman HJ, Vesselinov R (2003) Perceived coercion at hospital admission and adherence to mental health treatment after discharge. Psychiatr Serv 54(1):103–105

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sutherby K, Szmukler G, Halpern A, Alexander M, Thornicroft G, Johnson C, Wright S (1999) A study of crisis cards in a community psychiatric service. Acta Psychiatr Scand 100:56–61

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thornicroft G, Tansella M (2000) The ethical base of mental health service research. Recent developments in mental health service research in the UK. Acta Psychiatr Scand 399(Suppl):42–46

    Google Scholar 

  25. Department of Health (1999) Mental Health National Service Framework. Department of Health, London

  26. Gostin LO (2000) Human rights of persons with mental disabilities. The European Convention of Human Rights. Int J Law Psychiatry 23(2):125–129

    Google Scholar 

  27. Parkman S, Davies S, Leese M (1997) Ethnic differences in satisfaction with mental health services among representative people with psychosis in South London: PRiSM study 4. Br J Psychiatry 171:260–264

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Bindman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bindman, J., Reid, Y., Szmukler, G. et al. Perceived coercion at admission to psychiatric hospital and engagement with follow-up. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40, 160–166 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0861-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0861-x

Key words

Navigation