Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of UV light, X-ray and restriction enzyme treatment as tools in production of asymmetric somatic hybrids between Brassica napus and Arabidopsis thaliana

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

 Asymmetric somatic hybrids between Brassica napus (receptor) and Arabidopsis thaliana (donor) have been produced by three different methods supposed to induce asymmetry. The donor protoplasts were either UV- or X-irradiated, or the mixture of protoplasts was treated with the restriction enzyme PvuII immediately before fusion. The genome composition of the hybrids was analysed with Southern blot hybridisations using 15 different mapped A. thaliana RFLP markers as probes. Both UV- and X-irradiation were found to be efficient treatments for induction of asymmetry in somatic hybrids in a dose-dependent manner. The addition of a restriction enzyme to the protoplast mixture did not have any effect on the frequency of asymmetric hybrids or on the degree of asymmetry in the hybrids produced. UV- and X-irradiation resulted in higher fertility in the hybrids, while PvuII treatment did not have any effect on seed set. A significant positive correlation between degree of asymmetry in different plants and seed set after selfing was detected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 18 December 1997 / Accepted: 7 January 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forsberg, J., Lagercrantz, U. & Glimelius, K. Comparison of UV light, X-ray and restriction enzyme treatment as tools in production of asymmetric somatic hybrids between Brassica napus and Arabidopsis thaliana. Theor Appl Genet 96, 1178–1185 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050854

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050854

Navigation