Skip to main content
Log in

Landing in basal frogs: evidence of saltational patterns in the evolution of anuran locomotion

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

All frogs are assumed to jump in a similar manner by rapidly extending hindlimbs during the propulsive phase and rotating the limbs forward during flight in order to land forelimbs first. However, studies of jumping behavior are lacking in the most primitive living frogs of the family Leiopelmatidae. These semi-aquatic or terrestrial anurans retain a suite of plesiomorphic morphological features and are unique in using an asynchronous (trot-like) rather than synchronous “frog-kick” swimming gait of other frogs. We compared jumping behavior in leiopelmatids to more derived frogs and found that leiopelmatids maintain extended hindlimbs throughout flight and landing phases and do not land on adducted forelimbs. These “belly-flop” landings limit the ability for repeated jumps and are consistent with a riparian origin of jumping in frogs. The unique behavior of leiopelmatids shows that frogs evolved jumping before they perfected landing. Moreover, an inability to rapidly cycle the limbs may provide a functional explanation for the absence of synchronous swimming in leiopelmatids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Abourachid A, Green DM (1999) Origins of the frog-kick? Alternate-leg swimming in primitive frogs, families Leiopelmatidae and Ascaphidae. J Herpetol 33:657–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JS, Reisz RR, Scott D, Fröbisch NB, Sumida SS (2008) A stem batrachian from the Early Permian of Texas and the origins of frogs and salamanders. Nature 453:515–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist SM, Hunter ML Jr (2009) A multi-scale assessment of habitat selection and movement patterns by Northern Leopard Frogs (Lithobates [Rana] pipiens) in a managed forest. Herpetol Conserv Biol 4:142–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi I, Park K (1996) Variations in take-off velocity of anuran amphibians: relation to morphology, muscle contractile function and enzyme activity. Comp Biochem Physiol 113A:393–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE, Trueb L (1994) Biology of amphibians, 2nd edn. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson SB, De Jongh HJ (1980) Muscle activity at the ilio-sacral articulation of frogs. J Morph 166:129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, Haddad CFB, De Sa RO, Channing A, Wilkinson M, Donnellan SC, Raxworthy CJ, Campbell JA, Blotto BL, Moler P, Drewes RC, Nussbaum RA, Lynch JD, Green DM, Wheeler WC (2006) The amphibian tree of life. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 297:1–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans C, Parsons TS (1966) On the origin of the jumping mechanism in frogs. Evolution 20:92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis GB, Biewener AA (2000) Hindlimb extensor muscle function during jumping and swimming in the toad (Bufo marinus). J Exp Biol 203:3547–3563

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis GB, Akela T, Gunaratne R (2010) Do toads have a jump on how far they hop? Prelanding activity timing and intensity in forelimb muscles of hopping Bufo marinus. Biol Lett. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.1005

  • Green DM, Cannatella DC (1993) Phylogenetic significance of the amphicoelous frogs, Ascaphidae and Leiopelmatidae. Ethol Ecol Evol 5:233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirano M, Rome LC (1984) Jumping performance of frogs (Rana pipiens) as a function of muscle temperature. J Exp Biol 108:429–439

    Google Scholar 

  • James RS, Navas CA, Herrel A (2007) How important are skeletal muscle mechanics in setting limits on jumping performance? J Exp Biol 210:923–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins FA Jr, Shubin NH (1998) Prosalirus bitis and the anuran caudopelvic mechanism. J Vertebr Paleontol 18:495–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamel LT, Peters SE, Bashor DP (1996) Hopping and swimming in the leopard frog Rana pipiens. II. A comparison of muscle activities. J Morph 230:17–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marjanović D, Laurin M (2007) Fossils, molecules, divergence times, and the origin of lissamphibians. Syst Biol 56:369–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metter DE (1964) A morphological and ecological comparison of two populations of the tailed frog, Ascaphus truei Stejneger. Copeia 1964:181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauwelaerts S, Aerts P (2002) Two distinct gait types in swimming frogs. J Zool Lond 258:183–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauwelaerts S, Aerts P (2006) Takeoff and landing forces in jumping frogs. J Exp Biol 209:66–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly JC, Summers AP, Ritter DA (2000) The evolution of the functional role of trunk muscles during locomotion in adult amphibians. Am Zool 40:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters SE, Kamel LT, Bashor DP (1996) Hopping and swimming in the leopard frog Rana pipiens: i. step cycles and kinematics. J Morph 230:1–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Přikryl T, Aerts P, Havelková P, Herrel A, Roček Z (2009) Pelvic and thigh musculature in frogs (Anura) and origin of anuran jumping locomotion. J Anat 214:100–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shubin NH, Jenkins FA Jr (1995) An early Jurassic jumping frog. Nature 377:49–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Paul Brunkow, Mike Jorgensen, Sandra Nauwelaerts, Mike Paulin, James Robins, and John Scheibe for their comments and assistance. The Idaho Department of Fish and Game and United States Forest Service provided collecting permits. This work was supported by a Summer Research Fellowship and a Funded University Research grant from Southern Illinois University Edwardsville to RLE and an Ohio University Research Challenge grant to SMR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard L. Essner Jr..

Electronic supplementary materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(MPG 7654 kb)

ESM 2

(MPG 3881 kb)

ESM 3

(MPG 7386 kb)

ESM 4

(MPG 3449 kb)

ESM 5

(MPG 2128 kb)

ESM 6

(MPG 3932 kb)

ESM 7

(MPG 4287 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

The following landmarks were digitized: snout, occiput, urosacrum, shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, ankle, and tarsometatarsus. Jump distance was measured as the difference in position of the snout from the beginning of movement to the end of forward progress. Knee angle was measured as the angle formed by the hip, knee, and ankle. Ankle angle was measured as the angle formed by the knee, ankle, and tarsometarsus. Landing body attack angle was measured as the angle formed by the snout, urosacrum, and horizontal. Elbow angle was measured as the angle formed by the shoulder, elbow, and wrist. Forelimb protraction angle was measured as the angle formed by the wrist, occiput, and urosacrum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Essner, R.L., Suffian, D.J., Bishop, P.J. et al. Landing in basal frogs: evidence of saltational patterns in the evolution of anuran locomotion. Naturwissenschaften 97, 935–939 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-010-0697-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-010-0697-4

Keywords

Navigation