Abstract
Objective
Poor social relations are supposed to contribute to adverse health behaviour. We examined this association and the role of low socio-economic position.
Methods
We regressed health behaviour on composite variables of the two exposures of social relations and socio-economic position (SEP). Social relations included networks and support; health behaviour was analysed in terms of smoking, poor nutrition and physical inactivity; socio-economic position comprised of income and education. Cross sectional data from a population based epidemiological study in German (4,814 men and women aged 45–75) was analysed.
Results
Among the indicators for social relations, social isolation was consistently associated with adverse health behaviour; social support showed modest effect. A combination of poor social relations and low SEP displayed stronger (additive) associations with adverse health behaviour than each factor alone. However, superadditivity was excluded.
Conclusion
Given the important role of health adverse behaviour in chronic disease development, results underline the relevance of social environment and socio-economic structure in Public Health interventions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annandale E, Hunt K (eds) (2000) Gender inequalities in health. Open University Press, Buckingham
Bellach BM, Knopf H, Thefeld W (1998) Der Bundes-Gesundheitssurvey 1997/98. Gesundheitswesen 60:S59–S68
Berkman LF, Glass T (2000) Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I (eds) Social epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 137–173
Berkman LF, Melchior M, Chastang JF, Niedhammer I, Leclerc A, Goldberg M (2004) Social integration and mortality: a prospective study of French employees of Electricity of France-Gas of France: the GAZEL Cohort. Am J Epidemiol 159:167–174
Carlson LE, Goodey E, Hahn Bennet M, Taenzer P, Koopmans J (2002) The addition of social support to a community-based large-group behavioral smoking cessation intervention: improved cessation rates and gender differences. Addict Behav 27:547–559
Droomers M, Schrijvers CT, Mackenbach JP (2002) Why do lower educated people continue smoking? Explanations from the longitudinal GLOBE study. Health Psychol 21:263–272
Krause N, Borawski-Clark E (1995) Social class differences in social support among older adults. Gerontologist 35:498–508
Lehmann F, Geene R, Kaba-Schönstein L, Kilian H, Meyer-Nürnberger M, Brandes S (2006) Band 5: Kriterien guter Praxis in der Gesundheitsförderung bei sozial Benachteiligten. Köln
Mackenbach JP (2006) Health inequalities: Europe in profile—an independent expert report commissioned by the UK Presidency of the EU. Department of Health, London
Marmot MG, Bosma H, Hemingway H, Brunner E, Stansfeld S (1997) Contribution of job control and other risk factors to social variations in coronary heart disease incidence. Lancet 350:235–239
Murphy PA, Prewitt TE, Bote E, West B, Iber F (2001) Internal locus of control and social support associated with some dietary changes by elderly participants in a diet intervention trial. J Am Diet Assoc 101:203–208
Peterson JA, Yates BC, Atwood JR, Hertzog M (2005) Effects of a physical activity intervention for women. West J Nurs Res 27:93–110
Polidori MC (2003) Antioxidant micronutrients in the prevention of age-related diseases. J Postgrad Med 49:235
Rothman K, Greenland S (1986) Modern epidemiology. Little, Brown & Company, Boston
Schmermund A, Möhlenkamp S, Stang A, Grönemeyer D, Seibel R, Hirche H, Mann K, Siffert W, Lauterbach K, Siegrist J, Jöckel KH, Erbel R (2002) Assessment of clinically silent atherosclerotic disease and established and novel risk factors for predicting myocardial infarction and cardiac death in healthy middle-aged subjects: rationale and design of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. Am Heart J 144:212–218
Schmermund A, Möhlenkamp S, Berenbein S et al (2006) Population-based assessment of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis using electron-beam computed tomography. Atherosclerosis 185:177–182
Seeman TE, Berkman LF (1988) Structural characteristics of social networks and their relationship with social support in the elderly: who provides support. Soc Sci Med 26:737–749
Siegrist J, Theorell T (2006) Socioeconomic position and health: the role of work and employment. In: Siegrist J, Marmot M (eds) Social inequalities in health—new evidence and policy implications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 73–100
Stang A, Moebus S, Dragano N, Beck EM, Möhlenkamp S, Schmermund A, Siegrist J, Erbel R, Jöckel KH, on behalf of the Heinz Nixdorf Study (2005) Baseline recruitment and analyses of nonresponse of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study: identifiability of phone numbers as the major determinant of response. Eur J Epidemiol 20:489–496
Stronks K, van de Mheen HD, Looman CW, Mackenbach JP (1998) The importance of psychosocial stressors for socio-economic inequalities in perceived health. Soc Sci Med 46:611–623
UNESCO (1997) International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 1997. UNESCO, Paris
Weyers S, Dragano N, Moebus S et al (2008) Low socio-economic position is associated with poor social networks and social support: results from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. Int J Equity Health. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-13
Winkler G, Döring G (1995) Kurzmethoden zur Charakterisierung des Ernährungsmusters: Einsatz und Auswertung eines Food-Frequency-Fragebogens. Ernährungsumschau 42:289–291
Acknowledgments
We thank the Heinz Nixdorf Foundation (Chairman Dr. Jur. G. Schmidt) for their generous support of this study. This study is also supported by the German Ministry of Education and Science. We thank Prof. Dr. K. Lauterbach (Department of Health Economy and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Germany) for his valuable contribution to the study. We are indebted to the investigative group and the study personnel of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study, in particular Drs. G.F. Matysik, and M. Bröcker from the Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Advisory board: T. Meinertz, Hamburg (Chair); M. Blettner, Mainz; C. Bode, Freiburg; P.J. de Feyter, Rotterdam, Niederlande; B. Güntert, Hall i.T., Schweiz; F. Gutzwiller, Schweiz; H. Heinen, Bonn; O. Hess, Bern, Schweiz; B. Klein, Essen; H. Löwel, Neuherberg; M. Reiser, München; G. Schmidt, Essen; M. Schwaiger, München; C. Steinmüller, Bonn; T. Theorell, Stockholm, Schweden; S.N. Willich, Berlin. Criteria and end point committee: C. Bode, Freiburg (Chair), K. Berger, Münster; H.R. Figulla, Jena; C. Hamm, Bad Nauheim; P. Hanrath, Aachen; W. Köpcke, Münster; C. Weimar, Essen; A. Zeiher, Frankfurt. We also thank Dr. Frank Pühlhofer, Düsseldorf, and Dr. Tarani Chandola, London, for their support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weyers, S., Dragano, N., Möbus, S. et al. Poor social relations and adverse health behaviour: stronger associations in low socioeconomic groups?. Int J Public Health 55, 17–23 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-0070-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-0070-6