Skip to main content
Log in

A statistical model for Condorcet efficiency based on simulation under spatial model assumptions

Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay evaluates six single-winner, multicandidate electoral systems with respect to their tendency to choose Condorcet candidates. To this end I calibrate a logistic multiple regression model from Monte Carlo simulations, based on a multivariate normal spatial model, in which I vary the number of candidates, number of dimensions, correlation structure, and relative dispersion of candidates and voters. I investigate additional spatial-model variations by comparing further simulation results with predictions of the basic statistical model. The results suggest that for many electoral systems, Condorcet efficiency would increase with perceptual uncertainty of candidates' positions and would be low in a polarized society. Of the voting systems studied, approval voting and the Coombs systems appear least sensitive to variations in assumptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, J., and McKelvey, R. (1977). A method of scaling with applications to the 1968 and 1972 presidential elections. American Political Science Review 71: 111–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J. (1982). Polls and the problem of strategic information and voting behavior. Society 19: 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S., and Fishburn, P. (1983). Approval voting. Birkhauser: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordley, R.F. (1983). A pragmatic method of evaluating electon schemes through simulation. American Political Science Review 77: 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, J.R., and Cohen, M.D. (1978). Toward applicable social choice theory: A comparison of social choice functions under spatial model assumptions. American Political Science Review 72: 1341–1356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutter, L.E. (1982). The structure of voter preferences: The 1921, 1925, 1973, and 1975 Northern Irish Parliamentary elections. Comparative Political Studies 14: 517–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P., and Gehrlein, W. (1976). An analysis of simple two-stage voting systems. Behavioral Science 21: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P., and Gehrlein, W. (1977). An analysis of voting procedures with nonranked voting. Behavioral Science 22: 178–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, S. (1981). Strategic decisions under one-stage multi-candidate voting systems. Public Choice 36: 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, S. (1982). Strategic voting in multicandidate elections under uncertainty and under risk. In M. Holler (Ed.), Power, Voting, and Voting Power, 179–187. Würzburg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, S. (1984). A comparison of efficiency of multicandidate electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science 28: 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D.F. (1976). Multivariate statistical methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., and Wasserman, W. (1974). Applied linear statistical models. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, H. (1983). Voting procedures: A summary analysis. British Journal of Political Science 13: 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabushka, A., and Shepsle, K. (1972). Politics in plural societies, a theory of democratic instability. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. (1982). Liberalism against populism. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.A. (1972). Parties, voters, and the risk environment: A mathematical treatment of electoral competition under uncertainty. In R. Niemi and H. Weisberg (Eds.), Probability models of collective decision making, 273–297. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R.J. (1977). Comparison of voting systems. New Haven: Cowles Foundation Discussion paper # 498A.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merrill, S. A statistical model for Condorcet efficiency based on simulation under spatial model assumptions. Public Choice 47, 389–403 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127534

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127534

Keywords

Navigation